Masterarbeit, 2020
59 Seiten, Note: 1,0
1 Introduction
2 Short Selling (Bans)
2.1 The Idea of Short Selling
2.2 Evolution of Short Selling (Bans)
2.3 European Short Sale Bans in 2020
3 Literature Overview
4 Stock Liquidity
4.1 Variables and Data
4.2 Methodology
4.3 Empirical Results
4.4 Robustness Check
4.5 Effects of the Ban Lift
4.6 Country-by-Country Analysis
5 Price Efficiency
6 Stock Prices
7 Conclusion
This master's thesis examines the impact of short sale bans imposed during the Covid-19 crisis in spring 2020 on the market microstructure of European equity markets, specifically evaluating effects on liquidity, price efficiency, and stock price stabilization.
2.1 The Idea of Short Selling
If an investor enters a long position in any kind of financial instrument, she will gain if the price of the financial instrument increases. The most straightforward type of a long position is to buy stock in a publicly traded company. The opposite happens if an investor enters a short position in any kind of financial instrument. In that case, she will gain if the price of the financial instrument decreases. If an investor possesses the stock and wants to profit from potentially declining prices, she can simply sell the stock and buy it back after the stock price has fallen. The difference between the price at which the stock was sold and the price at which the stock is bought back equals the gross profit of the investor. However, if an investor does not possess the stock, but wants to profit from potentially falling prices, she can enter a short position.
As I use public equity data for this paper, I focus on short positions in stocks. There are multiple ways to enter a short position in a stock. An investor can borrow the stock from a lender (often a market dealer) at a certain fee. Usually, the borrower of the stock must pledge some collateral. The investor then sells the borrowed stock at the stock market, e.g., at a price of €100. After the stock price has fallen, she buys it back, e.g., at €90, and returns the stock to the lender. In this case, the gross profit for the short seller equals €10. This is usually known as classic short selling.
1 Introduction: This chapter outlines the market context of the 2020 Covid-19 crisis and defines the thesis's focus on the impact of short sale bans on market microstructure.
2 Short Selling (Bans): This chapter provides the theoretical framework of short selling mechanics and reviews the historical development and specific implementation of 2020 European bans.
3 Literature Overview: This section reviews existing academic literature regarding the effects of short sale bans on market liquidity, price efficiency, and stock prices.
4 Stock Liquidity: This chapter empirically analyzes how short sale bans influence market liquidity using various proxies and provides robustness checks through matching procedures.
5 Price Efficiency: This section tests whether short sale bans reduce price efficiency by examining how slowly stock prices incorporate idiosyncratic and market-wide information.
6 Stock Prices: This chapter investigates whether short sale bans effectively stabilize stock prices and prevent them from being artificially pushed downwards.
7 Conclusion: The final chapter summarizes the empirical findings and discusses the implications for regulatory policy regarding short sale restrictions.
Short Sale Bans, Market Microstructure, Stock Liquidity, Price Efficiency, Covid-19, European Equity Markets, Bid-Ask Spread, Amihud Ratio, Dollar Trading Volume, Abnormal Returns, Market Stabilization, Financial Regulation, Diff-in-Diff Estimation, Stock Price Volatility, Capital Markets
This thesis examines the consequences of temporary short sale bans introduced by several European countries during the market volatility triggered by the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic.
The core themes include the impact on market liquidity, the speed of price discovery (price efficiency), and the regulatory objective of stabilizing stock prices during market downturns.
The primary goal is to empirically determine if short sale bans achieve their intended regulatory purpose or if they lead to negative side effects such as impaired market quality.
The author employs a difference-in-differences (diff-in-diff) empirical approach using panel regression models, controlling for firm characteristics and market-wide developments, alongside matching procedures for robustness.
The main body systematically analyzes liquidity proxies, tests price efficiency models, and performs abnormal return analyses to evaluate whether banned stocks exhibit different performance compared to non-banned control stocks.
Key terms include short sale bans, market microstructure, stock liquidity, price efficiency, and European equity markets.
The author primarily measures liquidity through the percentage bid-ask spread, the Amihud illiquidity ratio, and dollar trading volume to capture different dimensions of liquidity and market turnover.
No, the empirical findings suggest that the bans do not prevent stock price declines or artificially push prices upwards, indicating that the intended stabilization goal is not met.
The study finds that liquidity tends to rebound or improve after the bans are lifted, suggesting a reversal of the negative liquidity effects observed during the ban period.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

