Bachelorarbeit, 2020
35 Seiten, Note: 1,0
1. Introduction
2. Liquidity provision in equity and corporate bond markets
2.1. Equity markets
2.2. Corporate bond markets
3. Post-crisis regulatory provisions
3.1. Basel 2.5
3.2. Basel III
3.3. The Volcker Rule
4. First-order impact on dealer liquidity provision
4.1. The business model of market makers
4.2. Channels of regulatory impact
4.3. Foundations of contemporary literature
4.4. Evidence of the regulatory impact on traditional dealers
5. Changes in market structure and behavior
5.1. Second-order effect (1): Shift from principal trading to matchmaking
5.2. Second-order effect (2): Migration of market making to non-bank dealers
6. Evidence of aggregate corporate bond market liquidity
6.1. Price-based liquidity measures
6.2. Trading-based liquidity measures
6.3. Liquidity under stress
7. Conclusion
The primary aim of this paper is to determine whether post-crisis regulatory interventions have led to a decline in liquidity within the corporate bond market. By analyzing how capital standards and trading restrictions affect the business models of market makers, the study explores the shifts in market structure and the behavioral responses of financial institutions to the new regulatory environment.
4.1. The business model of market makers
Market makers aim to generate facilitation revenues in the form of bid-ask spreads. For that, they must commit substantial capital, demonstrating the low-margin/high-volume nature of the business (CGFS, 2014). Besides, inventory revenues can result from appreciating positions. Market makers, however, typically evade these revenues as they reflect fundamental risk. Intuitively, to enter into principal trades, dealers expect revenues that outbalance costs. These are the cost of capital as well as financing and hedging costs.
By absorbing order imbalances into their balance sheets, dealers assume different risks for which they require compensation. For example, they bear the risk of trading with better-informed counterparties. Moreover, the usually unforeseeable emergence and direction of liquidity demand result in an uncertain exposure to market conditions. To manage these risks, dealers make decisions that pertain to the pricing, timing, and volume of trades (Duffie, 2012). A critical risk-sharing mechanism, as Schultz (2017) accentuates, is the interdealer market. Dealers, linked through intermediation chains, trade with each other to unwind their inventories and effectively provide liquidity.
Securities financing, like repurchase agreements (repos), enables market makers to encounter variable liquidity demand. Repos denote transactions in which dealers sell securities and agree to repurchase them subsequently. Thereby, dealers can simply pass on bondsto repo counterparties and use obtained funds to pay customers. That is, market makers must not have all assets on hand to provide liquidity. Repos represent a form of collateralized borrowing. Hence, from a dealers’ perspective, they lower financing costs and facilitate their risk management (Fontaine, Garriott & Gray, 2016).
1. Introduction: Presents the motivation behind post-crisis regulations and the resulting concerns regarding corporate bond market liquidity, outlining the paper's central research goal.
2. Liquidity provision in equity and corporate bond markets: Contrasts the structure of equity markets with the quote-driven, fragmented nature of corporate bond markets.
3. Post-crisis regulatory provisions: Introduces the technical details of Basel 2.5, Basel III, and the Volcker Rule as the primary regulatory frameworks under investigation.
4. First-order impact on dealer liquidity provision: Analyzes the direct influence of regulations on bank-affiliated dealers' capital, inventory costs, and overall business models.
5. Changes in market structure and behavior: Examines second-order market changes, specifically the shift towards agency/matchmaking and the entry of non-bank market makers.
6. Evidence of aggregate corporate bond market liquidity: Reviews empirical findings regarding price-based and trading-based liquidity measures, addressing contradictions found in current literature.
7. Conclusion: Synthesizes the findings, noting that while conventional liquidity metrics may seem stable, structural changes have increased the cost of immediacy for market participants.
Corporate Bond Market, Liquidity, Post-Crisis Regulation, Basel III, Volcker Rule, Market Making, Principal Trading, Matchmaking, Dealer Inventory, Bid-Ask Spread, Financial Regulation, Cost of Immediacy, Non-Bank Dealers, Systemic Risk, Market Structure.
The paper investigates the impact of post-crisis financial regulations, specifically Basel III and the Volcker Rule, on the liquidity of the U.S. corporate bond market and the behavior of market makers.
Key themes include the transformation of market maker business models, the constraints placed on dealer inventories, the rise of non-bank liquidity providers, and the debate surrounding the effectiveness of conventional liquidity measures.
The central question is whether post-crisis regulatory interventions have led to a decline in corporate bond market liquidity and how the market has structurally adapted to these changes.
The paper performs a comprehensive literature review, synthesizing theoretical models and empirical evidence—often using TRACE data—to analyze the regulatory impact on market dynamics.
The main part details the mechanics of bank-affiliated dealer business models, explains how specific regulatory channels increase costs, and examines empirical evidence regarding how these factors change market structure and liquidity outcomes.
Central keywords include corporate bond liquidity, regulatory impact, market making, Basel III, and the Volcker Rule.
It restricts proprietary trading by banks, which compels them to adopt "matchmaking" or "agency" trading models to avoid regulatory sanctions, thereby impacting the speed and availability of immediate trade execution.
It refers to the observation that while some price-based liquidity measures (like bid-ask spreads) appear stable or have improved, the actual cost of immediate execution for investors has risen significantly.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

