Masterarbeit, 2002
73 Seiten, Note: B+ (12 von 15 Punkten)
A. Introduction
B. The Convention Method
Defining an IGC
The Legal Background
The Interactive Relationship between an IGC and the Council
How to approach an IGC
IGCs in a theoretical perspective
Setting and Procedural Arrangements of former IGCs
The first circle of IGCs: 1950 - 1957
The second circle of IGCs: 1985 - 2000
IGC 2004 and the twin examples of the Convention on the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Convention on the Future of Europe
The Convention on the Charter of Fundamental Rights
The Future of Europe – Debate
The Convention on the Future of Europe
What makes the Difference?
Negotiation Process
Traditional Style vs. Convention Method
Future Prospects of the Convention Method
C. Conclusion
This dissertation examines the procedural arrangements of the "Convention Method" used to prepare the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) 2004, focusing on how this approach differs from the traditional, intergovernmental methods employed in previous treaty reforms. The central research question explores whether the Convention Method represents a successful model for enhancing transparency, democratic legitimacy, and efficiency in the European Union's negotiation processes.
Traditional Style vs. Convention Method
Since the fundamental features shared by each preparatory committee have been checked before, in the following paragraph the focus will lie on their differences. Thus, one needs to remember that the any negotiation process from preparatory work to the final decision-making is determined by the struggle for power. In the case of the EU, different levels from subnational to national to supranational with different kind actors exist. When it comes to negotiate an IGC, the responsible actors are the Heads of State and Government and for that reason, the former preparatory groups were composed of their personal representatives.
Thus, the group remained relatively small including 15 members and because they were personal representatives, the Heads of State and Government were able to keep the control over the preparatory work. In consequence, the input as well as the outcome reflected the interest of the Member States and were limited to the lowest common denominator among the Member States’ notions. Hence, the making of European politics was reserved to relations of unitary state actors and domestic political arenas, which stay complementary to the European stage, influenced negotiation positions.
A. Introduction: This chapter outlines the context of European integration, the role of Intergovernmental Conferences (IGCs), and introduces the focus on the Convention Method as a new procedural approach for preparing treaty reforms.
B. The Convention Method: This main part provides a comprehensive analysis of the legal and theoretical definitions of IGCs, reviews the history of former preparatory arrangements, and investigates the twin examples of the Convention on the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Convention on the Future of Europe.
C. Conclusion: The final chapter synthesizes the analysis, reflecting on whether the Convention Method successfully offers a more transparent and democratic alternative to traditional intergovernmental practices in shaping the future of the European Union.
Intergovernmental Conference, Convention Method, European Union, Treaty Reform, Supranationalism, Intergovernmentalism, Procedural Arrangements, Negotiation Process, Institutional Reform, Enlargement, Charter of Fundamental Rights, Future of Europe, Multi-level Governance, Decision-making, Democratic Legitimacy.
The work focuses on the procedural arrangements and working methods of the "Convention Method" used to prepare for the 2004 Intergovernmental Conference, rather than the substantive content of the treaties themselves.
Key themes include the shift from traditional intergovernmental negotiation styles toward more open, supranational-based practices, the importance of institutional design in decision-making, and the impact of these changes on transparency and legitimacy.
The primary goal is to determine if the Convention Method is a viable and appropriate model for organizing preparatory work for future IGCs within the European Union.
The author uses a comparative institutional analysis, examining historical records of preparatory committees and contrasting them with the organizational structure and procedural rules of the newer Conventions.
The main part covers the legal background of IGCs, theoretical frameworks of integration, the history of former IGCs, the specific mechanisms of the Conventions (Charter and Future of Europe), and a critical discussion of the negotiation processes.
Essential keywords include Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), Convention Method, Supranationalism, European Union, and Multi-level governance.
Unlike traditional models that were limited to representatives of Heads of State and Government, the Convention Method includes a diverse group of actors, including national parliamentarians, MEPs, and representatives from candidate countries, aiming for greater openness.
Yes, the author discusses the leadership of the Convention, particularly the role of the Chair and Praesidium, noting that their influence on the agenda and working program has at times caused controversy among convention members.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

