Masterarbeit, 2015
65 Seiten, Note: 75,0 (Auszeichnung)
This dissertation examines the complexities of collective response to global health crises, focusing on the role of competing frames, the public sphere, and the international community's capacity to act effectively. The study analyzes the 2003 SARS and 2014 Ebola outbreaks as case studies to illustrate the dynamics of crisis response and the impact of framing on the effectiveness of international governance.
The introduction sets the stage by highlighting the importance of global health governance in a world increasingly threatened by infectious diseases. It contrasts the contrasting responses to the 2003 SARS and 2014 Ebola outbreaks, raising questions about the factors that shape international action in times of crisis.
Chapter 2 delves into the theoretical framework underpinning the research, exploring the complexities of global health governance, the dynamics of crisis politics, and the role of public accountability in shaping international responses.
Chapter 3 outlines the methodological approach employed in the dissertation, providing a clear rationale for the chosen methods and their suitability for addressing the research questions.
Chapter 4 examines the two case studies – the 2003 SARS and 2014 Ebola outbreaks – analyzing the specific frames that emerged during each crisis, their influence on public discourse and decision-making, and the impact on the effectiveness of international response.
This research focuses on the interplay of competing frames, the public sphere, and global health governance in the context of pandemic crises. The key concepts explored include international health regulations, crisis management, pandemic preparedness, public perceptions, international cooperation, and the impact of framing on policy decisions.
Framing allows policymakers to cope with uncertainty by categorizing epidemic outbreaks and prescribing specific courses of action, which determines the extent of the collective international response.
The identified frames are: securitisation of medicine, medicalisation of insecurity, economics, human rights, and development.
The study suggests that divergent outcomes resulted from different politicisation and framing processes, leading to immediate containment for SARS while the Ebola crisis was protracted.
The public sphere, along with accountability ties and policymakers, forms a triangular relationship that shapes the sense-making phase of an epidemic and influences collective action.
Both SARS and Ebola reached phase five, which should have triggered comparable international efforts, yet the actual policy responses differed significantly due to political framing.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

