Doktorarbeit / Dissertation, 2004
154 Seiten, Note: A
1 Introduction
1.1 What Is Knowledge?
1.2 Definition of Knowledge Management
1.2.1 Does KM Include IT?
1.2.2 Discussing Other Perspectives
1.3 Related Fields to KM
1.3.1 MIS/DSS/...versus KM
1.3.2 Organizational Development / System Dynamics
1.3.3 Cognitive Research / Radical Constructivism
1.3.4 Does KM Differ from the Described Fields?
1.3.5 Differentiating KM in General
1.3.6 IT Is Enabling/Supporting KM
1.4 Knowledge Types
1.4.1 The Term Tacit Knowledge: Polanyi or Nonaka
1.4.2 Tacit/Implicit/Explicit Knowledge
1.4.3 Embedded versus Embodied Knowledge
1.5 What Can/Can't Be Done by IT
1.6 Areas of IT Related to KM-Systems
1.6.1 Business (ERP) Software from SAP / PeopleWare / Oracle
1.6.2 Information Management Systems
1.6.3 Groupware Systems like Lotus Notes
1.6.4 Customer Relationship Management
1.6.5 Artificial Intelligence
1.6.6 Other Areas
1.7 Focus of this Thesis
1.7.1 High versus Low Tangibility KM Processes
1.8 Interesting Artifacts
1.8.1 Classification of Interesting Artifacts
2 Goals, Problems, and Requirements of KM (-Systems)
2.1 Goals of KM
2.2 Problems Addressed by KM-Systems
2.3 Exemplified Goals and Problems of a University
2.3.1 Goals
2.3.2 Problems
2.3.3 Conclusion
2.4 Problems of KM-Systems
2.5 Requirements for KM-Systems
2.5.1 Capturing
2.5.2 Integrating & Connecting (technologically)
2.5.3 Transforming
2.5.4 Storing
2.5.5 Flexible & Adaptable Permission System
2.5.6 Connecting People
2.5.7 Artificial Intelligence / Data Mining / Knowledge Discovery in Databases / Machine Learning
2.5.8 Handling & Capturing Context, Links, and History
2.5.9 Automation
2.5.10 Searching/Finding & Retrieving
2.5.11 Embedding into Normal Work Procedures
2.5.12 Related Issues
2.5.13 Non-Functional Requirements
2.5.14 The Overall Picture
3 Preconditions/Foundations for KM (-Systems)
3.1 Want To Do KM and Know the Reasons Why
3.2 Sharing Culture/Organization
3.2.1 Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Motivation
3.2.2 Incentives
3.3 Truthfulness
3.4 Set and Evaluate Targets for KM
3.5 KM and Innovation/Creativity (the Learning Organizations)
3.6 Identifying Relevant Objects
3.6.1 Processes & Modeling
3.6.2 Best Practices
3.6.3 Conclusion
3.7 Barriers and Obstacles: Removing and Building
3.8 General Organizational Aspects/Changes
3.9 Conclusion
4 Existing Systems/Solutions
4.1 Problems Addressed by Practical Solutions
4.2 CYMANTIX.NET
4.2.1 Screen-shots
4.2.2 Analysis
4.3 Oracle
4.3.1 Screen-shots
4.3.2 Add-On Products / Further Possibilities
4.3.3 Analysis
4.4 Lotus/IBM Software (Knowledge Discovery System, Notes, ...)
4.4.1 Screen-shots
4.4.2 Detailed Discussion
4.4.3 Analysis
4.5 Evaluation of the Existing Solutions
4.5.1 Problems Addressed Efficiently
4.5.2 Problems Addressed to a Certain Degree
4.5.3 Problems Not Addressed At All
5 The Solution
5.1 Principles
5.1.1 General Principles
5.1.2 Individual Solution: Participatory Design
5.1.3 Differentiate Short from Long-Term Effects
5.1.4 “Supporting” Tacit and Implicit Knowledge
5.1.5 Integration Into Normal Work Procedures
5.1.6 Considering On-line/Offline Capabilities
5.1.7 Open APIs, Formats (XML) for Integration/Exchange
5.1.8 Usability
5.2 Features of the Solution
5.2.1 Central User Interface
5.2.2 Virtual Information Pool
5.2.3 Automation
5.2.4 Further Aspects
5.2.5 Why Not Peer-To-Peer (P2P)?
5.3 eLearning & KM
5.3.1 Opinions about eLearning & KM
5.3.2 Current Trends in eLearning
5.3.3 eLearning and the Proposed Solution
5.3.4 Summary
5.4 Implementation Considerations
5.4.1 Planning & Implementing the Solution
5.4.2 Working with the Solution
5.4.3 Examining the Exemplified University Problems
5.5 Evaluating the Solution
5.5.1 Evaluating the General Results
5.5.2 How the Solution Addresses the KM-related Problems
5.5.3 The Big Picture
6 Summary and Conclusion
6.1 KM: Its Goals and Problems
6.1.1 IT Only Part of the Solution
6.1.2 Goals/Problems and Requirements of KM (-Systems)
6.2 Preconditions/Foundations for KM (-Systems)
6.3 What Is Already Available – Existing Solutions
6.4 What Should Be Done – The Solution
6.5 Conclusion
6.6 Future Areas of Research
6.6.1 Narrowing Down the Field of KM
6.6.2 Computer Science Issues
6.7 Vision for the Field of KM
This thesis investigates the complex relationship between Knowledge Management (KM) and Information Technology (IT), aiming to propose a holistic KM system that effectively bridges technical and organizational requirements. The work seeks to address common organizational challenges by developing a comprehensive architecture that integrates diverse data sources and collaborative tools.
1.1 What Is Knowledge?
Despite the fact that scholars have devoted vast amount of time to the subject, there is still no generally accepted definition of knowledge. Therefore, I would like to quote Grey [44]2 who presents a rather pragmatic definition:
Context-relevant, validated information clusters that emerge when people somehow deal/interact with information elements/people.
As we can see from this definition (and many others in the field), knowledge is seen primarily as validated information3. Most researchers, nevertheless, agree that knowledge is personalized (individual) information and, thus, cannot be stored electronically.
Of course, philosophers like Polanyi or Popper (to name two of the more recent scholars) already gave great consideration to knowledge. Although there are quite intriguing definitions to be found, no single, generally accepted definition exists4.
Alavi and Leidner provide a good overview of the different proposed definitions for knowledge in the context of KM (see [3]). They summarize attempts to differentiate data, information, and knowledge in a hierarchical form that come primarily from those with an IT background. In this view, data items are just raw numbers and facts, information is processed data and knowledge is authenticated information. While this remains a classical approach, more recently a researcher named Tuomi5 has even proposed an inverse hierarchy (with information being the result of knowledge). Although these definitions provide limited insight to understand the nature of knowledge, they are actually of minor importance for most KM initiatives, since they only deal with knowledge that can be made explicit. Different types of knowledge are discussed in section 1.4.
1 Introduction: Provides a foundation by defining core concepts like Knowledge Management and discussing the evolving role of IT in enabling these processes.
2 Goals, Problems, and Requirements of KM (-Systems): Identifies and categorizes the diverse goals organizations pursue through KM and the persistent problems that hinder successful implementation.
3 Preconditions/Foundations for KM (-Systems): Examines essential organizational prerequisites, such as building a sharing culture and ensuring trust, which are critical before deploying any technical system.
4 Existing Systems/Solutions: Analyzes the functionality and limitations of three current industry solutions: CYMANTIX.NET, Oracle, and Lotus/IBM Software.
5 The Solution: Presents a comprehensive, holistic KM architecture built upon three pillars: a central user interface, a virtual information pool, and advanced automation.
6 Summary and Conclusion: Recaps the research findings, evaluates the proposed solution's feasibility, and outlines future directions for KM research.
Knowledge Management, KM Systems, Information Technology, Holistic KM, Tacit Knowledge, Explicit Knowledge, Virtual Information Pool, IT Integration, Organizational Culture, Automation, eLearning, Data Mining, Knowledge Discovery, Enterprise Portals, Participatory Design.
The thesis examines the relationship between Knowledge Management and Information Technology to develop a holistic, technologically sound KM system that addresses organizational needs.
The study covers knowledge definitions, the role of IT in KM, the identification of KM requirements, an analysis of commercial systems, and the proposal of a new, comprehensive KM architecture.
The goal is to move beyond mere IT-driven KM initiatives by proposing a holistic system that balances technical capabilities with organizational, cultural, and social requirements.
The work employs a literature-based analysis of current KM theories followed by a comparative study of existing software and a conceptual design of a proposed holistic KM architecture.
The main chapters analyze requirements for KM systems, evaluate existing market solutions from companies like Oracle and Lotus/IBM, and detail a multi-faceted solution architecture.
Key terms include Knowledge Management, KM Systems, IT Integration, Virtual Information Pool, Tacit Knowledge, and Organizational Learning.
The author emphasizes that knowledge is inherently personalized and social; while IT supports KM processes, it cannot manage or "possess" knowledge without human intervention and a supporting culture.
The thesis suggests that eLearning capabilities should be integrated into the KM system to facilitate ongoing organizational learning and to keep skills databases up-to-date with current course information.
It acts as the system's core, aggregating data from diverse internal and external sources to provide a consistent, searchable, and structured base for KM activities.
It serves as the single point of interaction for users, hiding the complexity of underlying systems and ensuring that the system is intuitive and accessible, which is vital for user acceptance.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

