Masterarbeit, 2019
56 Seiten, Note: 5,0
1. INTRODUCTION
2. THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT
2.1. Domain Theory
2.1.1. Uniting Management Accounting and Information Systems Frameworks
2.1.2. Evolving Role of Management Accountants
2.1.3. Contested Business Partner Ecosystem
2.1.4. Ambivalent Impact of Information Systems on Management Accountants
2.1.5. Emergence of Data Scientists
2.1.6. Research Questions
2.2. Method Theory
2.2.1. Katz & Kahn (1978): A Theory of Organizational Roles
2.2.2. Lado et al. (1997): A Classification of Interactions
2.2.3. Theoretical Framework
3. RESEARCH METHOD AND CASE BACKGROUND
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Data Collection
3.3. Data Analysis
3.4. Case Company
4. EMPIRICAL DATA AND ANALYSIS
4.1. Role of Data Scientists within the Case Company
4.1.1. Uncertain and High Expectations towards Data Scientists
4.1.2. Perceived and Occupied Roles of Data Scientists
4.2. Interactions between Data Scientists and Management Accountants
4.2.1. Task Monopolies of both Professions
4.2.2. Syncretic Interaction through Transfer of Data Science Models
4.2.3. Competitive Attitudes Triggered by Top Management
4.2.4. Collaborative Teamwork Resulting from low Role Ambiguity
5. CONCLUDING DISCUSSION
5.1. Data Scientists as a New Breed of Business Partner
5.2. Versatile Interactions Highly Influenced by Top Management
5.3. Outlook for Management Accounting
6. LIMITATIONS AND FURTHER RESEARCH
This master thesis investigates the role of data scientists in the corporate environment and their interaction with management accountants. The central research question explores whether data scientists perform traditional management accounting tasks and how inter-professional dynamics—ranging from competition to collaboration—shape the modern business partner ecosystem in organizations undergoing digital transformation.
4.2.2. Syncretic Interaction through Transfer of Data Science Models
Syncretic behavior is characterized not only by high competition but also by high collaboration. Data scientists and management accountants compete for the generation of insights at InsurCo. In the previous section, we were able to illustrate that DS teams have established a monopoly related to the BI&A systems. However, this monopoly is undermined by the limited business know-how of the youngest DS department, as illustrated above. Top management tries to counterbalance these shortcomings through the establishment of working groups to support data scientists. We argue that this constitutes a syncretic environment since the involved parties are on their own insight generation experts but at the same time have to collaborate in order to enable data scientists. It is in these instances that especially management accountants take on a strong validation role due to their industry and task expertise and, thus, are able to ensure a higher quality through an iteration of the results with the DS team. These findings are in line with the role of an ‘informed skeptic’ that McKinney Jr et al. (2017) perceive as crucial. According to them, management accountants shall take on a critical stance to prevent the use of BI&A systems as answer machines (Burchell et al., 1980).
1. INTRODUCTION: Discusses the advancement of business intelligence and analytics systems and identifies the research gap regarding the impact of data scientists on management accounting practices.
2. THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT: Reviews existing literature on management accounting, information systems, and organizational role theory (Katz & Kahn) to establish a conceptual framework for the study.
3. RESEARCH METHOD AND CASE BACKGROUND: Details the qualitative case study design conducted at "InsurCo" and explains the methodology for data collection and analysis.
4. EMPIRICAL DATA AND ANALYSIS: Presents the findings regarding the roles of data scientists and the nuanced interactions between them and management accountants within the case organization.
5. CONCLUDING DISCUSSION: Synthesizes the empirical findings to conclude that data scientists act as a "new breed" of business partner and influence the future direction of the management accounting profession.
6. LIMITATIONS AND FURTHER RESEARCH: Reflects on the study's constraints and provides suggestions for future academic exploration in the field of inter-professional organizational dynamics.
Business Intelligence & Analytics, Business Partner, Data Scientist, Information Systems, Interaction, Jurisdictional Competition, Management Accounting, Role, Digital Transformation, Organizational Roles, Performance Measurement, Decision Support, Professional Identity, Case Study, InsurCo.
The work investigates the introduction of data scientists into the corporate organizational structure and examines how this new professional group interacts with traditional management accountants.
Key fields include the evolution of management accounting, the rise of Data Science within the BI&A context, organizational role theory, and the management of professional boundaries.
The primary goals are to determine the role of the data scientist within the accounting context and to empirically analyze the nature of the interactions (conflict vs. collaboration/syncretism) between them and management accountants.
The authors employ a qualitative case study approach, conducting semi-structured interviews and thematic content analysis based on the organizational role theory developed by Katz & Kahn (1978) and the interaction classification by Lado et al. (1997).
The main part covers the role ambiguity of data scientists, task monopolies regarding systems and reporting, and the influence of top management on current power dynamics.
The study is characterized by terms like Business Intelligence & Analytics, Business Partner, Data Scientist, Jurisdictional Competition, and Role.
The study identifies the insurance industry as highly administrative and strictly regulated, which necessitates specific data handling and compliance measures that frame the interaction between IT, MA, and DS departments.
The authors conclude that data scientists indeed occupy core management accounting tasks and are emerging as a new breed of business partner, often successfully leveraging top management support to challenge the traditional role and informational tactics of management accountants.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

