Masterarbeit, 2021
118 Seiten, Note: 65.00
This dissertation aims to quantitatively analyze the mutual intelligibility and acceptability of regional Indian English (RIE) varieties. It investigates how speakers from different regions of India perceive and understand each other's speech, considering factors like accent recognition, intelligibility ratings, and language attitudes.
Chapter 1 - Overview: This chapter introduces the study, providing background information on Indian English within the broader context of World Englishes. It establishes the rationale for investigating mutual intelligibility and perceived acceptability of regional variations, highlighting the multilingual and educational contexts in India. The chapter clearly defines the study's aim and research questions, setting the stage for the subsequent chapters.
Chapter 2 - Literature Review: This chapter reviews existing literature on intelligibility and language attitudes, focusing specifically on the World Englishes perspective and research on Indian English. It explores theoretical frameworks for understanding intelligibility, examining various empirical studies and methodologies used to measure it. The chapter also delves into the theoretical underpinnings of language attitudes, particularly the dimensions of 'status' and 'solidarity,' and reviews relevant research on language attitudes towards Indian English.
Chapter 3 - Methodology: This chapter details the research methodology employed in the study, justifying the choice of a scalar rating method and explaining the participant selection process. It describes the data collection process, including the online questionnaire, the Verbal-Guise Technique (VGT) used for speech samples, and the rating scales implemented. The chapter also addresses ethical considerations and outlines the data analysis methods, including statistical techniques like t-tests and ANOVAs.
Chapter 4 - Results: This chapter presents the quantitative findings of the study. The results section likely details the findings related to accent recognition, intelligibility ratings, language attitudes (status and solidarity), and the impact of English Medium versus Vernacular Medium education on these factors. The chapter utilizes statistical analyses to interpret the data, offering insights into the relationships between the variables investigated.
Chapter 5 - Discussion: This chapter interprets the findings presented in Chapter 4, exploring the implications of the study's results. It likely discusses patterns and trends observed in accent recognition, intelligibility judgments, and language attitudes, relating the findings to the existing literature and exploring any potential biases or preferences revealed in the data. The discussion section likely connects the findings to the study's objectives and research questions.
Indian English, World Englishes, mutual intelligibility, perceived acceptability, language attitudes, accent recognition, regional variation, English Medium education, Vernacular Medium education, quantitative analysis, status, solidarity, Verbal-Guise Technique.
This dissertation quantitatively analyzes the mutual intelligibility and acceptability of regional Indian English (RIE) varieties. It investigates how speakers from different regions of India perceive and understand each other's speech, considering factors like accent recognition, intelligibility ratings, and language attitudes.
The study explores mutual intelligibility of different RIE varieties, perceived acceptability of different RIE varieties, the influence of regional background on perception of RIE, the relationship between education (English Medium vs. Vernacular Medium) and RIE perception, and language attitudes towards different RIE varieties.
Chapter 1 introduces the study, providing background information on Indian English within the context of World Englishes. It establishes the rationale for investigating mutual intelligibility and perceived acceptability of regional variations, highlighting the multilingual and educational contexts in India. The chapter defines the study's aim and research questions.
Chapter 2 reviews existing literature on intelligibility and language attitudes, focusing on the World Englishes perspective and research on Indian English. It explores theoretical frameworks for understanding intelligibility and examines empirical studies and methodologies used to measure it. The chapter also delves into the theoretical underpinnings of language attitudes (status and solidarity) and reviews relevant research on language attitudes towards Indian English.
Chapter 3 details the research methodology, justifying the use of a scalar rating method and explaining the participant selection process. It describes the data collection process, including the online questionnaire, the Verbal-Guise Technique (VGT) for speech samples, and the rating scales. The chapter addresses ethical considerations and outlines data analysis methods (t-tests and ANOVAs).
Chapter 4 presents the quantitative findings of the study. The results section details findings related to accent recognition, intelligibility ratings, language attitudes (status and solidarity), and the impact of English Medium versus Vernacular Medium education on these factors. Statistical analyses are used to interpret the data.
Chapter 5 interprets the findings from Chapter 4, exploring their implications. It discusses patterns and trends observed in accent recognition, intelligibility judgments, and language attitudes, relating the findings to the existing literature and exploring potential biases or preferences. The discussion connects the findings to the study's objectives and research questions.
Keywords include: Indian English, World Englishes, mutual intelligibility, perceived acceptability, language attitudes, accent recognition, regional variation, English Medium education, Vernacular Medium education, quantitative analysis, status, solidarity, and Verbal-Guise Technique.
The overall aim is to quantitatively analyze the mutual intelligibility and acceptability of regional Indian English (RIE) varieties, considering factors such as accent, regional background, and education.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!
Kommentare