Examensarbeit, 2009
22 Seiten, Note: 78/100
1. Introduction
2. Chosen organisations
2.1. Primark
2.2. CenterParcs
2.3. Swatch
2.4. Toyota
3. Summary of chosen companies
4. Service Companies: Primark and CenterParcs
4.1. CenterParcs
4.2. Primark
5. Comparison of Service companies Performance Objectives:
6. Manufacturing Companies: Swatch and Toyota
6.1. Swatch
6.2. Toyota
7. Conclusion
The primary objective of this assignment is to investigate and compare the operations strategies of two manufacturing companies and two service-based companies, analyzing how they prioritize performance objectives and align their tactics to achieve competitive advantage.
Toyota
Toyota has always been synonymous with efficiency due to their operations strategy that focus on process design rather than on product to achieve quality as a main order winner (Surowiecki, 2008). Through a combination of best in class operations efficiency tactics and advanced technical innovations in building quality cars for low cost, their cars are highly durable with good product features that are fully conformant with latest safety standards, providing added value for money to consumers. Toyota car quality consistently ranks near the top of customer satisfaction surveys. For example, Toyota was ranked 4th in JD Power’s 2009 Dependability study higher than its competitors and way above industry average, with 7 models ranking high among competing models (Figures 8 & 9). (autoblog, 2009)
Emulating Toyota winning quality isn’t about copying one practice or technology it’s about creating a culture. At Toyota, HR and Operations interlock in a unique way (Takeuchi et al., 2008). Toyota stands out from competitors such as GM and Honda in its unique continuous learning culture that is based on basic principles of trust, mutual prosperity, and excellence. Believing that motivated people become committed to building high-quality products, Toyota’s HRM strategy revolves around building and maintaining quality people through a four stage process in a good environment: Attract Develop, Engage and Inspire. (Liker et al., 2007)
Introduction: Defines operations strategy as the set of strategic decisions that set the role and objectives of a firm to achieve competitive advantage through order winners.
Chosen organisations: Introduces the four companies under study (Primark, CenterParcs, Swatch, Toyota) and highlights their market positions.
Summary of chosen companies: Provides a comparative overview of the organizations across key metrics like employees, turnover, and operational priorities.
Service Companies: Primark and CenterParcs: Analyzes how these firms manage demand fluctuations and leverage infrastructure and service design as order winners.
Comparison of Service companies Performance Objectives:: Uses radar graphs to visualize and contrast the performance objective priorities between the two service companies.
Manufacturing Companies: Swatch and Toyota: Examines how these companies use innovation, radical automation, and lean production to maintain cost and quality advantages.
Conclusion: Synthesizes the findings, emphasizing that competitive advantage is sustained through the fit among interlocked activities and specific consumer needs.
Operations Strategy, Order Winners, Competitive Advantage, Performance Objectives, Supply Chain, Lean Production, Process Design, Capacity Management, Cost Leadership, Quality Assurance, Service Strategy, Manufacturing Efficiency, Toyota Production System, Market Positioning, Resource Management
The assignment explores how four specific companies—Primark, CenterParcs, Swatch, and Toyota—utilize operations strategies and tactics to maintain market leadership.
Order qualifiers are the minimum standards a firm must meet to participate in a market, while order winners are the factors that directly contribute to customers choosing a firm's product or service over rivals.
The paper asks how manufacturing and service companies prioritize their performance objectives and align their operational tactics to secure a competitive advantage.
The author uses an integrated evaluation approach, comparing firm-specific performance objectives, process designs, and capabilities against industry standards and requirements.
The main body conducts a comparative analysis of service-based firms (Primark, CenterParcs) and manufacturing-based firms (Swatch, Toyota), utilizing data and performance radar graphs.
Key terms include Operations Strategy, Competitive Advantage, Order Winners, Lean Production, and Capacity Management.
Toyota relies on a continuous learning culture, the Toyota Production System (TPS), and a focus on process design to achieve high quality and low costs.
CenterParcs employs a "chase demand" strategy and yield management systems to optimize room occupancy and revenue during varying seasonal demand.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

