Examensarbeit, 2008
85 Seiten, Note: 1,0
1. Introduction
2. Theory and Methodology
2.1. New Historicism
2.1.1. Theoretical Assumptions
2.1.2. Methodology
2.1.3. Possible Foci
2.2. Cultural Materialism
2.3. Approach and Methodology of this Study
2.4. Social Change
3. Main Part
3.1. Shirley as a Victorian Multi-Plot Novel
3.2. The Industrial Plot
3.2.1. Shirley – A Condition of England Novel
3.2.2. The Setting - The Historical Socio-Economic Situation of 1811/12 and Its Representation
3.2.2.1. The Historical Socio-Economic Situation of 1811/12 – Napoleonic Wars and Orders in Council
3.2.2.2. The Representation of 1811/12 in Shirley
3.2.3. Luddism and Chartist Movement - The Technique of Backdating
3.2.3.1. The Luddite Movement
3.2.3.2. The Chartist Movement
3.2.3.3. Reasons for Backdating
3.2.3.3.1. Personal and Political Factors
3.2.3.3.2. Institutional Factors – The Victorian Publishing Sector
3.2.3.3.3. Backdating as a Technique for a Subtle Comment on Chartism
3.2.3.4. Results
3.2.4. The Portrayal of the Luddites – “A Lurid Travesty”?
3.2.4.1 Sound Research
3.2.4.2. Tory Views and the Myth of the Luddites - A Paternalist Solution
3.2.4.1.1. Ambivalent Attitude towards the Working Classes
3.2.4.1.2. Tory Partiality and the Middle-class Myth of the Luddites
3.2.4.1.3. Paternalism as a Solution for the Condition of England Question
3.2.4.1.4. Results
3.2.4.3. Relationship between Gentry and Middle-Class as the Main Focus
3.2.4.4. Links to Other Discourses
3.2.4.4.1. Luddism and Victorian Denominations
3.2.4.4.2.1. Victorian Denominations
3.2.4.4.2.2. Shirley’s Attack on Methodism and Antinomianism as the Driving Force Behind Working-Class Militancy
3.2.4.4.2.3. The Anglican Church in Need of an Evangelical Reform
3.2.4.4.2. Critique of the Whig-Interpretation of History and of Nostalgic Currents
3.2.4.4.2.1. History as the Leading Discipline in the Age of Science
3.2.4.4.2.2. Nostalgia and Victorian Medievalism
3.2.4.4.2.3. Shirley’s Cyclic Notion of History and Its Critique of Nostalgia
3.2.4.4.3. Belief in the Advantageous Effects of Industrialism on the Condition of Victorian Women
3.2.4.4.3.1. Playing Down of Child Labour
3.2.4.4.3.2. The Women’s Question
3.2.4.4.3.3. Feminists’ Belief in the Self-Supporting Factory Girl and in a Practical Republicanism of Trade
4. Conclusion and Outlook
This work aims to examine the processes of social change represented in Charlotte Brontë’s novel Shirley, specifically investigating how the historical setting of the 1811-12 Luddite riots functions as an indirect commentary on the Chartist movement of the 1840s. The central research objective is to analyze how the novel’s industrial plot reflects contemporary socio-economic tensions, power constellations, and ideological discourses of the Victorian era.
3.2.3.1. The Luddite Movement
The Luddites were organized groups of early 19th-century working men, who attacked textile mills which introduced and use shearing frames or other machinery. They destroyed machines which they regarded symbols of the Industrial Revolution (cf. Collins Dictionary of British History, 282; Fröhlich, 97; Maurer, 325; Thaden, 86). They originated in 1811 in the Nottingham area at the heyday of the abrogation of paternalist legislation, when the economy of laissez-faire was imposed upon the working people against their will and conscience.
Luddites mainly operated in the Midlands and in Yorkshire, but Luddite activity occurred in Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Lancashire and West-Yorkshire in 1811-12 and 1816 (cf. Bodenheimer, 45 with reference to E.P. Thompson; Hook & Hook, Introduction 26; Fröhlich, 97; Collins Dictionary of the British History, 282; Maurer, 295, 325; Frawley, 462). The movement’s name derives from the signature “Ned Ludd” which was used on a workmen’s manifesto, and reputedly belonged to a Leicestershire youth who broke some machinery in 1799 (cf. Collins Dictionary of British History, 282; Maurer, 325).
Since government feared a revolutionary conspiracy, it repressed the Luddites harshly. Machine breaking was punished by death penalty, and the authorities deployed 12,000 troops against the rioters, considerably more than the number of British soldiers who Wellington had under his command in the Peninsular. In 1813 seventeen Luddites were executed in York and the movement was more or less suppressed (cf. Collins Dictionary of English History, 282; Hook & Hook, Introduction 26; Fröhlich, 105).
1. Introduction: This chapter contextualizes Shirley within Charlotte Brontë's body of work, identifying it as a socio-economic portrayal of historical conflict rather than a strictly biographical novel.
2. Theory and Methodology: This section establishes the research framework by employing New Historicism and Cultural Materialism to analyze the interrelation between literary texts, historical contexts, and power discourses.
3. Main Part: This primary section investigates the multi-plot structure of the novel, focusing on the industrial and feminist plots as manifestations of Victorian social change, class consolidation, and ideological debates.
4. Conclusion and Outlook: The final chapter synthesizes the research findings, confirming that the novel's historical backdating serves as a subtle, strategic commentary on the contemporary issues of Chartism and industrial modernity.
Charlotte Brontë, Shirley, Luddism, Chartism, Condition of England, New Historicism, Cultural Materialism, Paternalism, Social Change, Victorian Novel, Industrial Revolution, Women's Question, Class Consciousness, Political Reform, Historical Context
The work focuses on the representation of social change in Charlotte Brontë's novel Shirley, analyzing the interplay between the industrial events of 1811-12 and the political climate of the 1840s.
The study covers Luddism, the Chartist movement, the Women's Question, industrial-era labor relations, and the influence of contemporary political and religious discourses on Victorian literature.
The goal is to demonstrate that Brontë deliberately used backdating as a sophisticated narrative technique to critique Chartism and propose paternalism as an alternative solution to class conflict without facing censorship.
The author utilizes New Historicism and Cultural Materialism to contextualize the text within its historical, political, and socio-economic frameworks.
The main part delves into the multi-plot nature of the novel, the historical reality of the Luddite riots, the representation of various social classes, and the influence of religious and economic ideologies.
Key terms include Charlotte Brontë, Luddism, Chartism, Condition of England, New Historicism, Paternalism, and Social Change.
The work argues that while the portrayal is historically researched, it is also ambivalent, often colored by a middle-class perspective and a Tory bias that frames Luddite unrest as "misguided" while simultaneously sympathizing with the individual suffering of the workers.
Paternalism is identified as the author's idealized solution to class struggle, advocating for the moral responsibility and benevolence of the ruling classes to guide and protect the working classes as a way to avert revolution.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

