Bachelorarbeit, 2023
44 Seiten, Note: 2,3
1 Introduction
2 The MSR in the bigger picture
2.1 The Sustainability Goals of the EU
2.2 European Union Emission Trading System
3 Market Stability Reserve
3.1 Roots of the MSR
3.2 Principles of the MSR
3.3 MSR changes in recent years
3.4 Future proposed reform
3.5 Technical background of the MSR
4 Design phenomena of the ETS and MSR
4.1 Waterbed effect
4.2 Effects of the Policy Mix
4.3 Temporary Aspect
4.4 The Green Paradox
4.5 German Coal phase out
5 Proposed changes and the future of the MSR
5.1 Price floor
5.2 Price Stability Reserve
6 Future Perspective of the MSR and ETS
6.1 Future of the Surplus
6.2 Future of the EUA price
7 Discussion
8 Conclusion
This thesis examines the role of the Market Stability Reserve (MSR) within the EU Emission Trading System (ETS), evaluating its effectiveness in reaching environmental targets and proposing potential efficiency improvements. The research focuses on how structural supply-demand imbalances are addressed and identifies design phenomena that currently influence the mechanism's performance.
4.1 Waterbed effect
Perino describes in his 2018 paper the MSR changes made in 2018 as “puncturing” the waterbed. This refers to the effect on a waterbed that occurs when the water is pushed on one side of the bed and it just shifts to another part of the bed, not changing the actual amount of water the bed holds in total (Kerstine Appunn 2019). In the context of the EU ETS the waterbed is the cap of the cap-and-trade, and the water is the emission allowances (ibid.).
If the EUAs are not cancelled, they can be used for later verification. That means that any reduction in allowances due to for example a low carbon innovation does not reduce the actual cap but can be banked or sold to be used later somewhere else. This is the desired effect as it makes innovation cost-effective since the cheapest innovations are prioritized (European Court Of Auditors 2015). On the other side, it does not produce enough incentives for industries where innovations are more cost-intensive if the innovations are still more expensive than the EUA price (Kerstine Appunn 2019). This has for example been the case for electricity from low carbon innovations like solar power in the competition against electricity from emission intensive lignite, coal extraction being found the most sensitive to allowance price variation (ibid; Pyrka et al. 2022). Cases like this have also been the main driver of calls for a EUA price floor (Kerstine Appunn 2019; Perino et al. 2021a).
1 Introduction: Provides an overview of the MSR's role in the EU ETS and states the objectives of this thesis.
2 The MSR in the bigger picture: Outlines the EU's sustainability goals and the fundamental structure of the European Union Emission Trading System.
3 Market Stability Reserve: Details the historical development, principles, and technical mechanisms governing the MSR operation.
4 Design phenomena of the ETS and MSR: Analyzes systemic challenges including the waterbed effect, policy mix impacts, the Green Paradox, and the German coal phase-out.
5 Proposed changes and the future of the MSR: Evaluates potential reforms, focusing on pricing tools like the Carbon Price Floor and Price Stability Reserve.
6 Future Perspective of the MSR and ETS: Forecasts the development of allowance surpluses and price trends under the "Fit for 55" scenarios.
7 Discussion: Synthesizes the findings and critically assesses the balance between MSR's stabilization functions and observed market challenges.
8 Conclusion: Concludes that while the MSR is essential, ongoing refinement is necessary to address unintended consequences of overlapping policies.
Market Stability Reserve, MSR, European Union Emission Trading System, EU ETS, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Waterbed Effect, Green Paradox, Cap-and-Trade, Carbon Price Floor, Price Stability Reserve, Fit for 55, EUA, Sustainability, Linear Reduction Factor, Emissions Surplus
This work aims to evaluate how the Market Stability Reserve functions within the EU ETS to reach EU environmental goals and to propose ways to enhance its efficiency.
The research covers the MSR's mechanics, its historical development, identified design flaws like the waterbed effect and the Green Paradox, and potential future reforms.
The primary goal is to outline the MSR's role in improving structural supply-demand imbalances and to analyze which modifications could make it more effective in reducing emissions.
The thesis utilizes a literature-based analysis, incorporating microeconomic perspectives on market mechanisms and evaluating modeling data from academic studies on ETS performance.
The main part analyzes the MSR's technical operation, explores systemic design phenomena, and discusses how these interact with national policies like the German coal phase-out.
Key concepts include MSR, EU ETS, Green Paradox, waterbed effect, carbon pricing, and environmental policy reform.
The Green Paradox refers to the counterintuitive result where future emission reduction announcements increase present-day emissions, causing the MSR to function inefficiently by cancelling fewer allowances than intended.
It describes a systemic flaw where reductions in emissions achieved outside the ETS cap are offset elsewhere because the total quantity of allowances (the "water") remains constant, unless the surplus is removed via the MSR.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

