Advocating International Recognition of Moroccan Sovereignty over Western Sahara

Table of Contents

I. INTRODUCTION

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

Opponents of Moroccan Sovereignty

Proponents of Moroccan Sovereignty

Literature Gaps

Theoretical Perspectives

III. METHODOLOGY

Literature Review Variable

Operationalization and Correlation

A Constructivist Analysis

Study Limitations

IV. FINDINGS & ANALYSIS

V. CONCLUSION

Research Objectives and Themes

This thesis investigates the Western Sahara conflict by evaluating arguments for and against Moroccan sovereignty. It seeks to address overlooked themes—such as the Moroccan autonomy plan, humanitarian conditions in Polisario-controlled camps, and historical pre-colonial ties—to determine if international recognition of Moroccan sovereignty is the most viable path for regional stability and conflict resolution.

• Analysis of the historical and legal ties between Morocco and the Sahrawi people.
• Evaluation of the Moroccan autonomy plan as a framework for regional governance.
• Examination of the humanitarian and security crises within Polisario-controlled refugee camps.
• Comparative analysis of Western Sahara’s self-determination discourse against the backdrop of failed states like South Sudan.
• Assessment of the geostrategic implications and stability risks of a potential independent, non-viable state.

Excerpt from the Book

Summary of Chapters

I. INTRODUCTION: The introduction establishes the Western Sahara conflict as a protracted dispute and argues for the necessity of investigating a permanent resolution through international recognition of Moroccan sovereignty.

II. LITERATURE REVIEW: This chapter analyzes existing scholarly arguments regarding Western Sahara, contrasting the "colonization" narrative with historical claims of sovereignty and noting significant gaps in the literature regarding autonomy plans and humanitarian realities.

III. METHODOLOGY: This section details the qualitative research design, employing a constructivist approach and deductive reasoning to test the hypothesis of the non-viability of an independent Western Sahara state.

IV. FINDINGS & ANALYSIS: This chapter argues that the evidence supports Moroccan sovereignty, emphasizing the risk of state failure and advocating for a shift in analysis from simple decolonization narratives to a more comprehensive view of regional stability.

V. CONCLUSION: The final chapter summarizes the findings, reiterating that legitimate historical and socio-economic reasons support the Moroccanness of Western Sahara and calling for international intervention to end the conflict through the Moroccan autonomy plan.

Keywords

Western Sahara, Morocco, Polisario Front, Moroccan Sovereignty, Autonomy Plan, Self-determination, Decolonization, Regional Stability, Failed State, Constructivism, Bay’a, Humanitarian Crisis, South Sudan, Geopolitics, International Recognition

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core argument of this thesis?

The thesis argues that international recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara is necessary to ensure regional stability and replace the current, protracted conflict with a viable path forward.

What are the central thematic fields discussed?

The work centers on the statehood argument, the humanitarian conditions in refugee camps, the strategic security importance of the region, and the significance of historical ties between Morocco and the Sahrawi people.

What is the primary objective of the research?

The primary objective is to make a compelling case for Moroccan sovereignty by providing a critical assessment of academic literature and filling gaps regarding the feasibility of an independent state versus the Moroccan autonomy proposal.

Which methodology does the author utilize?

The author uses a qualitative research methodology with a constructivist theoretical framework to analyze non-numerical data and evaluate the causal factors influencing the conflict.

How is the main body of the work structured?

The main body moves from a review of existing academic perspectives and gaps, through a methodological explanation, to an analytical findings section that assesses the potential for state failure versus successful integration.

Which keywords best describe the research?

The core keywords include Western Sahara, Moroccan sovereignty, autonomy plan, regional stability, constructivism, and humanitarian crisis.

How does the author use the example of South Sudan?

The author uses South Sudan as a comparable case study to illustrate the risks of state failure when a territory secedes without a sufficient foundation for economic, administrative, and political viability.

What is the significance of the "Bay'a" in this analysis?

The "Bay'a" is presented as a vital legal and historical bond—a pledge of allegiance—that demonstrates the long-standing ties between the Moroccan monarchy and Sahrawi tribes, challenging the narrative of colonization.