Bachelorarbeit, 2021
78 Seiten, Note: passed
This study aimed to assess the determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among community health workers in Minglanilla, Cebu, Philippines. The research sought to understand the factors influencing their acceptance or rejection of the vaccine during its initial rollout.
CHAPTER I: THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE: This chapter introduces the study, providing the rationale behind investigating COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among community health workers in Minglanilla, Cebu. It establishes the problem statement, outlining the study's objectives and significance. The chapter also defines key terms and addresses ethical considerations relevant to the research, setting the stage for the subsequent methodological and analytical sections.
CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE: This chapter would delve into existing research on vaccine hesitancy, exploring various contributing factors, including contextual influences, individual beliefs, and the role of information dissemination. It likely reviewed studies on community health worker attitudes towards vaccines and examined the effectiveness of different intervention strategies to promote vaccine uptake. The chapter would provide a theoretical framework for understanding the complexities of vaccine hesitancy.
CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURES: This chapter details the research design and methods employed in the study. It describes the descriptive cross-sectional design, the selection of participants (187 community health workers), and the instrument used (a modified WHO survey questionnaire on vaccine hesitancy). The data collection methods and analysis techniques (percentages, weighted means, ANOVA) are also outlined, providing a clear picture of the research process.
CHAPTER IV: PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA: This chapter would present the findings of the study, analyzing the data collected from the survey questionnaire. It would detail the demographic profile of the respondents and examine the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy across different groups. The analysis likely involved investigating the statistical significance of various factors (contextual influences, individual and group influences, vaccine-specific influences) in predicting vaccine hesitancy levels. The results section would provide a detailed breakdown of the findings, potentially using tables and figures to illustrate key trends and patterns.
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, community health workers, Philippines, vaccine acceptance, contextual influences, individual influences, group influences, vaccine-specific influences, survey research, descriptive cross-sectional design, action plan, public health.
This document provides a preview of a research paper. It includes the table of contents, objectives, key themes, chapter summaries, and keywords. It aims to give a comprehensive overview of the study before delving into the full research.
The study assesses the determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among community health workers in Minglanilla, Cebu, Philippines. It explores the factors influencing their acceptance or rejection of the vaccine during its initial rollout.
The key themes include determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among community health workers, the influence of contextual factors on vaccine acceptance, the impact of individual and group influences on vaccination decisions, the role of vaccine-specific information and concerns, and the development of an action plan to address vaccine hesitancy.
Chapter I introduces the study, outlining the rationale for investigating COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among community health workers. It establishes the problem statement, objectives, significance, defines key terms, and addresses ethical considerations.
Chapter II delves into existing research on vaccine hesitancy, exploring contributing factors like contextual influences, individual beliefs, and information dissemination. It reviews studies on community health worker attitudes towards vaccines and examines intervention strategies to promote vaccine uptake.
Chapter III details the research design and methods, including the descriptive cross-sectional design, participant selection (187 community health workers), and the instrument used (modified WHO survey questionnaire). It also outlines the data collection and analysis techniques (percentages, weighted means, ANOVA).
Chapter IV presents the findings of the study, analyzing the data collected from the survey questionnaire. It details the demographic profile of the respondents and examines the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy across different groups, investigating the statistical significance of various factors in predicting vaccine hesitancy levels.
Keywords include COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, community health workers, Philippines, vaccine acceptance, contextual influences, individual influences, group influences, vaccine-specific influences, survey research, descriptive cross-sectional design, action plan, and public health.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!
Kommentare