How can International Management Theory contribute to International Management Practice?

Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION

2. THE RESEARCH-PRACTICE GAP

2.1 Defining the Research-Practice Gap

2.2 Causes of the Research-Practice Gap

3. WHAT CAN ACADEMICS DO?

3.1 Reexamine the academic publication process

3.2 Interact more and more efficient with practitioners

3.3 Be not afraid of context

4. WHAT CAN PRACTITIONERS DO?

Research Objectives and Themes

This paper examines the persistent research-practice gap within the field of International Management, aiming to identify its core causes and provide actionable strategies for both academics and practitioners to foster better collaboration and knowledge application.

• The role of the academic publication process in limiting research relevance.
• Challenges in knowledge production and knowledge transfer between academia and management.
• The dominance of quantitative methodology and the need for context-sensitive theory.
• Strategies for improving researcher-practitioner interaction and communication.
• The importance of multi-disciplinary perspectives in management research.

Excerpt from the Book

Summary of Chapters

1. INTRODUCTION: This chapter introduces the research-practice gap in International Management and outlines the paper's goal of exploring how research can effectively contribute to management practice.

2. THE RESEARCH-PRACTICE GAP: This section defines the gap as a dual problem of knowledge production and knowledge transfer while detailing the academic and structural causes behind it.

3. WHAT CAN ACADEMICS DO?: This chapter proposes solutions for researchers, including reforming the publication process, enhancing engagement with practitioners, and adopting more context-sensitive and multi-disciplinary research approaches.

4. WHAT CAN PRACTITIONERS DO?: This section discusses the necessary support from professional associations and the role of leadership in advocating for evidence-based management to bridge the gap.

Keywords

International Management, Research-Practice Gap, Knowledge Production, Knowledge Transfer, Evidence-based Management, Academic Rigor, Relevance, Context-sensitive Theory, Multi-disciplinary Research, Tacit Knowledge, Practitioner Interaction, Publication Process, Management Practice, Research Impact, Context Theorizing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary focus of this research paper?

The paper addresses the significant disconnect between academic research findings and their practical application within the field of International Management (IM).

What are the main thematic areas explored in the text?

The core themes include the limitations of current academic publication models, the challenges of knowledge transfer, the dominance of quantitative methods, and the necessity of incorporating context and multi-disciplinary views.

What is the research question addressed by the author?

The primary question is: "How can International Management research contribute to International Management practice?"

Which scientific methodology does the paper utilize?

The paper employs a critical literature review and conceptual synthesis to examine academic paradigms and institutional structures within management research.

What does the "main body" of the paper cover?

The main body explores the root causes of the research-practice gap, such as the "closed loop" of academia, and provides specific recommendations for both academics and practitioners to narrow this divide.

Which keywords define this work?

Key terms include International Management, research-practice gap, evidence-based management, knowledge transfer, and academic rigor.

How does the author define the "closed loop" in academia?

It describes a system where senior researchers mentor new professors using the same inherited paradigms, prioritizing internal peer review over practical application or practitioner input.

What is meant by "context-sensitive theory" in this paper?

It refers to research that moves beyond static, homogenized models by accounting for dynamic cultural and situational variables that define management phenomena.