Masterarbeit, 2009
120 Seiten, Note: 1,3
Geschichte Europas - Neueste Geschichte, Europäische Einigung
1.Introduction
1.1.Construction of the Work
1.2.Literature Review and Methodology
2.Europeanness
2.1.Definition of Europe and Europeanness
2.2.European Identity in Connection with European Culture and Its Problem Fields
2.3.Inclusion, Exclusion and and Multiple Identities
3.Europeanness of Turkey
3.1.Turkey as (not) a geographical part of Europe
3.2.Turkey as (not) a historical and cultural part of Europe
3.3.Westernisation/Europeanisation Process in Turkey
3.3.1.From the Era of the Ottoman Empire to the Foundation of the Turkish Republic
3.3.1.1.Reforms under the Rule of Sultan Selim III – Nizam-i Jedid (1789-1907)
3.3.1.2.Reforms under the Rule of Sultan Mahmut II (1785-1839)
3.3.1.3.Reforms in the Era of Tanzimat (1839-1871)
3.3.1.3.1.Military Reforms
3.3.1.3.2.Reforms in the Central Bureaucracy
3.3.1.3.3.Reforms the Judicial Affairs and Secular Laws
3.3.1.3.4.Secular Education in the Era of Tanzimat
3.3.1.3.5.Cultural Changes in the Era of Tanzimat
3.3.1.4.Young Turks Era: Transition from Ottoman- to Turkish Nationalism (1908-1918)
3.3.1.5. Reforms in the Turkish Republic under the Rule of Atatürk (1922-1938)
3.3.1.6.Reforms after the Helsinki Phase (1999-2009)
4.Turkey Between Orient and Occident
5.Political Culture in Turkey from Atatürk to Erdoan
6.Intercultural Dialogue Between Turkey and Europe and the European Cultural Programmes which Turkey takes part in
7.Conclusion
The primary aim of this master’s thesis is to critically examine the historical background and current context of Turkey’s cultural identity in relation to the debate on its potential European integration. The research question addresses whether Turkey, given its unique historical path and cultural characteristics, aligns with the concept of "Europeanness" and whether its integration could serve as an opportunity for the European Union.
3.1. Turkey as (not) a geographical part of Europe
One European perspective on Turkey is that Turkey is geographically not a European country. In this respect the following statements are significant:
“Die Türkei ist ein kleinsasitatischer, nicht europäischer Staat, desen Aufnahme das grossartige Projekt der politischen Einheit Europas torpedieren würde…”
“Zwar besitzt die Türkei noch eine kleine europäische Enklave, doch deckt diese nur fünf Prozent ihres Territoriums und acht Prozent der Bevölkerung ab. Der restliche Teil des Landes Liegt in Asien, auf der anatolischen Hochebene…”
“Die Türkei gehört weder geographisch, geschichtlich noch kulturell zu Europa.”
“Die Geographie ist bedeutsam. Die Aufnahme eines Staates mit 75 Millionen Einwohnern, dessen Staatsgebiet zu 97 Prozent in Vorderasien liegt, macht uns zu Nachbarn von Georgien, Armenien, dem Irak, Iran und Syrien.”
“Der Beitritt der Türkei zur EU ist nicht eine rein ökonomische oder politische Frage, sondern eine geografische, denn nur ein Teil der Türkei gehört zu Europa, und wenn wir uns über unsere natürlichen Grenzen nicht klar sind, bis wohin soll Europa noch reichen?...”
In the light of the above mentioned statements it must be pointed out that Turkey is a eurasian country whose territory lies mostly on the Asian continent. However, this should not be seen as a factor determining Turkey’s geographical Europeanness or non-Europeanness. Even Malta, Martinique, Guadeloupe and French-Guayana are accepted European, although they are geographically outside the European continent.
Furthermore, as I have mentioned in the first chapter, Europe’s borders are not clearly determined; “whereas Europe’s borders to the North, west and south are undisputed, those to the east and south-east remain fluid, and open to interpretation”. In this regard, Europe’s borders are constructed according to conditions and interests. So, it would be not correct to state that Turkey is geographically not a part of Europe. Also the Ankara Agreement which created an association between Turkey and the European Economic Community shows that Turkey is already considered by the EU to be a European country.
1.Introduction: This chapter defines the research scope, introduces the concept of Europeanness, and outlines the methodological approach used to analyze Turkey's identity.
2.Europeanness: This section explores how "Europe" and "Europeanness" are defined, contrasting substantialist and constructivist approaches while discussing European identity within the context of culture.
3.Europeanness of Turkey: This comprehensive chapter examines Turkey's geographical and historical ties to Europe, detailing its long process of Westernisation and Europeanisation, including reforms from the Ottoman era to the modern Republic.
4.Turkey Between Orient and Occident: This chapter analyzes Turkey’s unique position, bridging Eastern and Western civilisations, and challenges the binary antagonism often associated with these terms.
5.Political Culture in Turkey from Atatürk to Erdoan: This chapter surveys the development of Turkish political culture, the role of Kemalism, and the secular state, tracing the shift toward democracy.
6.Intercultural Dialogue Between Turkey and Europe and the European Cultural Programmes which Turkey takes part in: This chapter evaluates the role of intercultural dialogue in the accession process and reviews Turkey's participation in various EU cultural frameworks.
7.Conclusion: This chapter synthesizes the main findings, asserting that Turkey's identity is an opportunity for a diverse Europe and emphasizing the need for a real partnership.
Turkey, European Union, Europeanness, Identity, Westernisation, Europeanisation, Tanzimat, Kemalism, Intercultural Dialogue, Orient, Occident, Political Culture, Accession Negotiations, Constructivism, Modernisation.
The work examines whether Turkey can be considered a European country, exploring the historical, cultural, and political dynamics of its identity and its potential for full membership in the European Union.
Key themes include the construction of European identity, the historical Europeanisation process in Turkey, the dichotomy between the Orient and the Occident, and the role of political culture and Islam in modern Turkey.
The goal is to provide a detailed analysis of Turkey's cultural identity to determine if it should be perceived as an asset or opportunity for the European Union, rather than a threat.
The research relies on an interdisciplinary approach, utilizing academic literature and political, historical analysis to reflect on Turkey’s integration path and its synthesis of East and West.
The main sections cover the definition of Europeanness, the historical reforms from the Ottoman Empire through the Tanzimat era to modern Turkey, and the political evolution from Atatürk to the present.
The research is best characterized by terms such as Europeanisation, Turkish identity, Westernisation, Kemalism, and intercultural dialogue.
The author argues that the conflict between these "worlds" is not rooted in religious differences, but rather in political and economic circumstances, and that Turkey serves as a unique synthesis of both.
The author explains that the military has acted as a self-appointed guardian of Kemalist principles, intervening in politics to protect the state, which has historically complicated Turkey’s democratic image in the West.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

