Magisterarbeit, 2012
88 Seiten, Note: Very Good
Chapter One
1.1. Background of the Study
1.2. Statement of the Problem
1.3. Research Questions
1.4. Objectives of the Study
1.5. Methodology and Methods of the Study
1.5.1. Population and Sampling Technique
1.5.2. Data Collection Instruments
1.5.3. Data Analysis
1.6. Scope of the study
1.7. Limitations of the study
1.8. Ethical considerations
1.9. Significance of the Study
1.10. Structure of the Study
Chapter Two: Conceptual and Legal Frameworks of Women’s Right to Property Inheritance
Introduction
2.1. Inheritance
2.1.1. Determinants of Women’s Right to Property Inheritance
2.1.1.2. Socio –Cultural Determinants
2.1.1.3. Structural and Legal Determinants
2.2. International Human Rights Framework on Women’s Right to Property and Inheritance
2.2.1. CEDAW and the Right to Property Inheritance
2.3. Regional Human Rights Framework on Women’s Equal Right to Property and Inheritance
2.4. The Scope of Women’s Property Rights
2.4.1. Women’s Right to Land
2.4.2. Women’s Right to Adequate Housing
2.5. State Duty on Equal Right to Property Inheritance
2.5.1. The Duty to Respect
2.5.2. The Duty to Protect
2.5.3. The Duty to Fulfill
2.6. National Human Rights Framework on Women’s Right to Equal property Inheritance
Introduction
2.6.1. The Ethiopian State Obligation under International and Regional Human rights Framework
2.6.2. Principles of Equality and Non-Discrimination under the FDRE Constitution
2.6.3. Women’s Right to Property and Inheritance under FDRE Constitution
2.6.4. The Revised Family Code
2.6.5. The Civil Code of 1960
2.6.6. Customary Practices of Dispute Resolution
2.6.7. The Sharia law
Chapter Three: Context of the Study Area
Introduction
3.1. Location and Population
3.2. Administrative Structure
3.3. Social Organization and Clan Relationship of Konso
3.3.1. Clan and Lineage of Konso
3.4. Economic Activities
3.5. Pattern of Marriage
3.5.1. Bride wealth
3.6. The Role of Women in Konso
Chapter Four: Findings and Analysis of the Study
Introduction
4.1. Traditional Systems of Inheritance among the Konso Society
4.1.1. Land Inheritance
4.1.2. House Inheritance
4.1.3. Other Properties
4.2. Socio-Cultural Factors Hindering Women’s Equal Rights to Property Inheritance
4.2.1. Patrilineal and Extended Family Systems
4.2.2. The Perception of Women as Outsiders
4.2.3. Sons as Guardians of the Family
4.2.4. The Perception of Women on Property Management
4.2.5. Social Stigma and Distrust
4.2.6. Marital Status
4.3. Customary Versus Judicial Dispute Settlement of the Right to Inheritance
4.3.1. Customary Dispute Settlement
4.3.2. The Role of Women in Customary Dispute Settlement Regarding Inheritance
4.4. Formal Adjudication of Women’s Inheritance Rights Dispute
4.4.1. Challenges in Formal Adjudication of Inheritance Rights
4.4.1.1. Issues of Implementation
4.4.1.2. Rate of Withdrawal of Court Cases
4.4.1.3. Financial Constraints
4.5. Implications of Discriminatory Inheritance System on Women’s Rights in Konso
4.5.1. The Right to Equal Inheritance
4.5.2. Women’s Right to Property
4.5.3. The Right to Adequate Standard of Living
4.5.4. The Right to Family and Women’s Right to Re-marry
4.5.5. Implications on Prevalence of Violence against Women
Chapter Five: Conclusion and Recommendation
5.1. Conclusion
5.2. Recommendation
This study focuses on identifying and analyzing cultural practices and legal enforcements that discriminate against women regarding property inheritance in the Konso society, with the aim to recommend pathways for better protection of their human rights.
4.2.5. Social Stigma and Distrust
Social stigma or exclusion is also another factor which can be accounted for women disinheritance of property in Konso. The members of the community are subjected to cultural indoctrination of the inability or inappropriateness of women inheritance of property. According to results of key informants and female FGD, women who claim inheritance of property are considered as the ‘greedy defectors of the custom’ and more vulnerable to social exclusion. Thus due to the fear of not to be alienated from their family and community women are unlikely to claim inheritance rights, even if they know it deserve for them as reflected in the discussion with female FGD participants.
These social discrimination and distrust is serious particularly for women who claim their inheritance rights through court. One of interviewee, who gained their home upon the death of their father by court decision after the long period, has expressed the problem as:
“While I went back to my home from court, people in the village and on road were pointing at me saying phrases such as ‘the inheritor is coming, inheritor is coming.’ They blamed me for breaking the cultural rule and humiliating my family. And it was so hard for me to bear and was so discouraging and frustrating. Now we are back to using our deceased father’s house by the decision of the court. However, I do fear that the brothers of my deceased father will evict us if my mother dies.”
Chapter One: Provides background, research questions, and the qualitative methodology used to investigate inheritance practices among the Konso society.
Chapter Two: Conceptual and Legal Frameworks of Women’s Right to Property Inheritance: Reviews international, regional, and national legal standards and their intersection with customary and religious inheritance laws.
Chapter Three: Context of the Study Area: Describes the physical, social, and economic settings of the Konso Woreda to contextualize the prevailing social organization and inheritance dynamics.
Chapter Four: Findings and Analysis of the Study: Presents empirical findings on traditional inheritance, socio-cultural barriers, and the challenges within both customary and formal legal dispute settlement systems.
Chapter Five: Conclusion and Recommendation: Summarizes the study’s findings on the discriminatory impact of customary systems and suggests pathways to improve the realization of women’s equal rights.
Konso Society, Women’s Property Rights, Inheritance, Discriminatory Practices, Human Rights, Customary Dispute Settlement, Legal Adjudication, Patrilineal Family System, Gender Equality, Women’s Empowerment, Land Tenure, Divorce, Widowhood, Disinheritance, Ethiopia.
The study examines the practices regarding women's rights to property inheritance within the Konso society of Ethiopia, specifically investigating how traditional and cultural systems often exclude women from inheriting land and other assets.
The main themes include the collision between formal legal guarantees of equality and entrenched patriarchal customary practices, the socio-economic vulnerabilities of women and widows, and the limitations of both customary and state-based dispute resolution mechanisms.
The primary goal is to analyze the cultural and structural barriers to women's inheritance and provide evidence-based recommendations to help protect and realize these rights within the Konso context.
The author employed a qualitative research approach, utilizing focus group discussions with clan heads, elders, and women, as well as semi-structured interviews with victims, court personnel, and a review of court inheritance cases.
The main part of the paper reviews the national and international legal frameworks, details the socio-cultural factors (such as the patrilineal system and gender-based perceptions) that hinder women, and analyzes the challenges women face when attempting to seek justice through legal adjudication.
Key terms include Konso society, Women's inheritance, Property rights, Gender discrimination, Patrilineal system, Customary law, Human rights, and Judicial adjudication.
The study finds that while customary dispute settlement is more accessible to the local population, it is inherently patriarchal and biased in favor of men, often prioritizing cultural norms over the property rights of women and widows.
The formal judicial system is described as theoretically better for women because it recognizes their equal legal status, yet its practical effectiveness is significantly limited by financial constraints, withdrawal of cases due to social pressure, and lack of enforcement mechanisms at the local level.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

