Magisterarbeit, 2009
89 Seiten, Note: 1,7
Introduction
1. The Culture of Censorship
1.1 Alteration of Social Norms
1.2 State of Art and an Attempt of Term (re)Definition
2. Historical Background
2.1 Control of the Printing Press in Tudor England
2.2 Control of the Printing Press in Early Stuart England
2.3 Control of the Printing Press in Late Stuart England
3. Regulation of the Printing Press in the 18th century
4. Banned Books: the Reformation of Literature
4.1 Books Suppressed on Religious Grounds: The Shortest Way with the Dissenters and the trial of Daniel Defoe
4.2 Books Suppressed on Political Grounds: Drapier’s Letters and Hibernian patriot Jonathan Swift
4.3 Books Suppressed on Moral Grounds: The epic comedy of human nature: The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling by Henry Fielding
Conclusion
This study explores the development and implementation of literary censorship in eighteenth-century England, focusing on the transition from state-led pre-publication licensing to the use of common law, such as libel, to control public discourse. The primary research objective is to examine how the English government utilized legal restrictions to suppress political criticism, religious dissent, and perceived moral impropriety, and to compare these methods with those employed in preceding centuries.
The Culture of Censorship
As mentioned in the introduction, censorship is as old as civilization or has been around since the first act of writing. One must be aware, however, that the word “censorship” as we understand it, was unknown to ancient or even Middle Age societies; the institution of the censor existed in ancient Rome. The censor, a magistrate, had two tasks to complete, to register the citizens to pay taxes (census) and to supervise public morals (censura morum), as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary. Thus a close relation between censorship and morality is self-evident, with the latter being defined through cultural norms and customs.
Verification of an utterance is based on the validity of norms which are the instruments of social control. According to Williams, “[n]orms … are rules of conduct; they specify what should and should not be done by various kinds of social actors in various kinds of situations.” All societies have rules or norms specifying appropriate and inappropriate behaviour, which have been accepted as legitimate by all members of society. This means that social norms are generally established; otherwise, a person who does not conform to general rules can be punished. This statement also applies to products of cultural life of society, such as art, music, and literature.
Written words illuminate changing cultural attitudes towards social life and since literature can, through its readers, exert a strong influence on norm formation, it is a censor’s task to preserve social norms. In other words, a modern understanding of censorship regards it as a technique used for the proving of printed materials by means of accepted norms, in order to make possible alterations or to enact a ban. These norms, which in turn are based on a widespread idea of values, undergo a historical change without which there would be little or no progress. In this process, the tension between normative claims and their enforcement plays an essential role.
Introduction: Provides the definition of censorship as a form of social control and outlines the historical shift in censorship methods from the ancient world to the development of the printing press in England.
1. The Culture of Censorship: Discusses the theoretical connection between social norms, morality, and censorship, highlighting the evolution of the term and its function in maintaining societal order.
2. Historical Background: Traces the evolution of print control through the Tudor, early Stuart, and late Stuart dynasties, examining the shifting authority from the Church to the State.
3. Regulation of the Printing Press in the 18th century: Examines the implementation of common law, specifically the law of libel, as the primary mechanism for regulating the press following the expiration of the Licensing Act.
4. Banned Books: the Reformation of Literature: Analyzes the political, religious, and moral landscape of the eighteenth century and provides case studies of how specific works were suppressed or challenged under these grounds.
Conclusion: Synthesizes the findings, arguing that while various legal mechanisms were used to restrict the press, censorship remained a contentious and often ineffective tool for total control of public opinion.
Censorship, eighteenth-century England, seditious libel, printing press, Daniel Defoe, Jonathan Swift, Henry Fielding, freedom of speech, social norms, government control, licensing, blasphemy, obscenity, literature, public opinion.
The research focuses on the historical development of literary censorship in eighteenth-century England and how the government adapted its control mechanisms following the end of pre-publication licensing.
The main themes include the regulation of the printing press, the evolution of libel laws, the political environment of the eighteenth century, and the influence of literature on public norms.
The goal is to analyze the various methods of censorship employed by the English government and to understand how these methods differed from earlier, more authoritarian practices.
The study uses historical and critical analysis, drawing on primary sources, legal history, and literary theory to examine censorship as both a political tool and a cultural phenomenon.
The main body covers the transition of print control through the Stuart and Tudor periods, the shift toward secular censorship in the 18th century, and detailed discussions of specific banned works by authors like Defoe, Swift, and Fielding.
Censorship, eighteenth-century England, seditious libel, printing press, freedom of speech, and political control.
The author examines how the work was misunderstood as a genuine high-church tract rather than satire, leading to Defoe's prosecution and serving as a turning point in his journalistic career.
The trial is discussed as an example of how Swift navigated the legal dangers of his time, using pamphlets as a form of political protest while managing to evade severe punishment due to public support.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

