Forschungsarbeit, 2009
24 Seiten, Note: A-
This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness and achievements of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in light of the objectives outlined in the UN Resolution 955, 1994. The paper considers the ICTR's role in enforcing restrictions against perpetrators of the Rwandan genocide, bringing justice, ensuring fair trials, contributing to criminal justice, and promoting reconciliation and peace.
The paper begins by providing an overview of the Rwandan genocide and its impact on the region. Chapter 2 delves into the characteristics of the genocide, exploring its historical context, the motivations behind the killings, and the role of political and social factors in fueling the violence. Chapter 3 discusses the establishment of the ICTR, highlighting its mandate and its key legal frameworks. It explores the ICTR's successes and shortcomings in conducting trials and delivering justice.
Chapter 4 examines the legal, financial, and political aspects of the ICTR. It analyzes the ICTR's contributions to international criminal law, including the development of the law of genocide and the establishment of universal liability. The chapter also evaluates the ICTR's financial costs and their implications for development and peace-building in Rwanda. The chapter concludes by discussing the ICTR's role in promoting national reconciliation and peace, and its limitations in achieving these objectives. The paper does not include a summary of the conclusion.
The paper examines the ICTR's impact on international criminal justice, genocide, human rights, humanitarian intervention, reconciliation, and peacebuilding. The work also focuses on the role of the ICTR in promoting national reconciliation and its effectiveness in achieving justice, as well as the legal, financial, and political challenges faced by the tribunal.
Established by UN Resolution 955 in 1994, the ICTR was mandated to prosecute persons responsible for genocide and other serious violations of international humanitarian law in Rwanda.
The paper argues that while the ICTR was a 'vehicle of justice,' it was hardly designed for reconciliation, often failing to connect with survivors and witnesses on the ground.
The ICTR made significant contributions to the law of genocide, including the first conviction for genocide by an international court and defining rape as a means of perpetrating genocide.
Shortcomings included high financial costs, slow proceedings, and a perception that it was a 'job creation program for foreigners' rather than a benefit to the Rwandan people.
The paper notes a significant failure and ignorance by the global society, which ignored early warnings of the impending genocide, making the ICTR a necessary but belated step.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

