The role of policies and regulations on sustainability and their role towards supply chain resilience

Outline

1 Introduction

2 Literature Review

2.1 Conceptual outlines

2.1.1 Sustainability and supply chain resilience

2.1.2 Legislation in the EU

2.1.2.1 Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive

2.1.2.2 EU Taxonomy Regulation

2.1.2.3 Circular Economy Action Plan

2.1.2.4 Critical Raw Materials Act

2.1.2.5 Sustainability and SCR in the European framework

2.1.3 Legislation in China

2.1.3.1 Environmental Protection Law

2.1.3.2 Green Bond Catalogue

2.1.3.3 Circular Economy Promotion Law

2.1.3.4 14th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development

2.1.3.5 Sustainability and SCR in the Chinese framework

2.2 Comparative analysis of the EU and China

2.2.1 EU’s approach to sustainability and SCR

2.2.2 Legislative impact on sustainability and SCR in the EU

2.2.3 China’s approach to sustainability and SCR

2.2.4 Legislative impact on sustainability and SCR in China

3 Future outlook of bilateral economic relations

3.1 Potential for consensus

3.2 Controversial debates

4 Discussion

4.1 Theoretical implications

4.2 Managerial implications

4.3 Limitations and further research

5 Conclusion

Objectives and Research Themes

This thesis examines and compares how legislative frameworks in the European Union and China address the intersection of sustainability and supply chain resilience. It explores the motivations behind selected policies, their practical implementations, and the broader economic, strategic, and geopolitical contexts shaping them, ultimately providing insights into how these regulations impact domestic economies and bilateral trade relations.

• Legislative strategies for sustainability and supply chain resilience
• Comparative analysis of EU and Chinese regulatory approaches
• Strategic autonomy and de-risking in globalized supply chains
• Trade-offs between sustainability initiatives and resilience goals
• Geopolitical implications for bilateral economic relations

Excerpt from the Book

Summary of Chapters

1 Introduction: This chapter introduces the multifaceted crises and challenges of the 21st century, establishing the importance of balancing sustainability with supply chain resilience.

2 Literature Review: This section defines the core concepts of sustainability and supply chain resilience, reviews the specific legislative frameworks in both the EU and China, and provides a comparative analysis of their respective approaches and legislative impacts.

3 Future outlook of bilateral economic relations: This chapter analyzes the consensus and controversial debates currently shaping the economic relationship between the EU and China.

4 Discussion: This section details the theoretical and managerial implications of the research, acknowledging limitations and suggesting areas for future study.

5 Conclusion: The final chapter summarizes the thesis, highlighting the differing but pivotal roles of legislative frameworks in both regions and the need for adaptive strategies.

Keywords

Sustainability, Supply Chain Resilience (SCR), European Union, China, Legislation, Green Deal, Circular Economy, Dual Circulation, Strategic Autonomy, De-risking, Environmental Protection Law, Critical Raw Materials Act, Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, Geopolitics, Supply Chains

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core focus of this research?

The research examines the relationship between sustainability and supply chain resilience through the lens of legislative frameworks in the EU and China, exploring how these regulations influence strategic decisions in a globalized economy.

What are the primary themes discussed?

Central themes include the comparative analysis of EU and Chinese environmental legislation, the impact of these laws on supply chain resilience, the geopolitical context of bilateral trade, and the strategic shift toward economic autonomy.

What is the primary goal of this dissertation?

The goal is to analyze the role of legislative frameworks in both regions, identifying synergies and conflicts between sustainability and resilience objectives, and providing insights for businesses and policymakers.

Which methodology is employed?

The thesis utilizes a comparative analysis approach based on an extensive literature review, including government documents, legislative texts, case studies, and academic papers.

What is addressed in the main part of the thesis?

The main part provides an in-depth review of EU regulations (such as CSRD and CRMA) and Chinese frameworks (such as the EPL and 14th FYP), followed by an analysis of the consensus and tensions in bilateral economic relations.

Which keywords characterize the work?

Key terms include Sustainability, Supply Chain Resilience, European Union, China, Strategic Autonomy, De-risking, and Circular Economy.

How does China's "dual circulation" strategy influence supply chains?

China's "dual circulation" strategy aims to prioritize domestic markets and internal production to reduce dependence on foreign markets, thereby shifting the focus of its economic planning to enhance national supply chain security.

What is the "Brussels effect" mentioned in the research?

The "Brussels effect" refers to the passive extension of EU regulatory standards beyond its borders, as the EU acts as a "global regulatory power" by setting high sustainability standards that non-EU entities must often adopt to remain competitive.