Forschungsarbeit, 2008
19 Seiten, Note: 1,33
I. Introduction
II. Methodology, Data Sources and Variables
III. Results
Bivariate Correlations: Aggregate Level
Bivariate Correlations: Regional level
Control variables
Partial correlation
Multiple regression analysis
IV. Conclusion
V. Bibliography
VI. Appendix
This study investigates the relationship between various measures of ethnic, linguistic, and religious diversity and generalized social trust on a national level, aiming to clarify whether diversity measurements significantly predict trust levels or if other socio-economic factors are more influential.
II. Methodology, Data Sources and Variables
In this paper we analyze the data from the papers by Alesina et al. (2003) and Fearon (2003) with the objective to re-examine the effects of diversity on trust, as measured by Bjørnskov (2008). We start by combining the different measures of diversity and the trust measure into one common dataset. We extract our first three variables - ethnic fractionalization, linguistic fractionalization, and religious fractionalization from the comprehensive overview of diversity by Alesina et al. (2003). They are measured through the probability that two randomly picked individuals of the population belong to a different group. A maximum value of 1 is reached when each person belongs to a different group as it can be seen from the following formula:
The variable linguistic heterogeneity identifies linguistic groups on the basis of languages spoken as “mother tongues” within a country and the religious heterogeneity variable identifies religious groups within a country. The data for both is taken from Encyclopedia Britannica. For the variable ethnic heterogeneity, which identifies ethnic groups within a county incorporating also racial and language characteristics, the authors compare and combine data from Encyclopedia Britannica, CIA Factbook and Minority Rights Group International in order to achieve higher reliability (Alesina et al., 2003, p. 158-160)
The next two measures of diversity are taken from Fearon (2003). The ethnic groups are classified according to Fearon’s prototypical ethnic group using the following criteria:
I. Introduction: Outlines the rise of social capital research, identifies the gap in conceptualizing diversity, and sets the research goal of testing diversity's impact on trust.
II. Methodology, Data Sources and Variables: Describes the integration of diverse datasets (Alesina et al., Fearon, Bjørnskov) and defines the statistical variables and formulae used for the analysis.
III. Results: Details the empirical findings from bivariate correlations, regional comparisons, partial correlations, and multiple regression models while testing the influence of control variables.
IV. Conclusion: Summarizes that diversity measures alone are insufficient predictors for trust and highlights the greater relevance of GDP, GINI coefficient, and Rule of Law.
V. Bibliography: Lists the academic sources and datasets used to support the research paper.
VI. Appendix: Provides comprehensive statistical data tables and graphs supporting the bivariate and multiple regression analyses.
Social Capital, Social Trust, Ethnic Fractionalization, Linguistic Fractionalization, Religious Fractionalization, Diversity Measure, GDP per capita, GINI coefficient, Rule of Law, Regression Analysis, Correlation, World Values Survey, Globalization, Migration, Socio-economic Factors
The paper examines whether different measures of social diversity, such as ethnic or linguistic fragmentation, have a significant impact on generalized social trust across different countries.
The main themes include social capital theory, the influence of diversity on societal cohesion, and the impact of economic and political governance indicators on interpersonal trust.
The study aims to determine if the diversity measure used matters for explaining trust, and if so, which specific diversity variable has the most significant impact.
The authors employ Pearson Product Moment Correlation, partial correlation tests to control for external factors, and multiple linear regression analysis.
The main section covers the methodological framework, bivariate correlations at both aggregate and regional levels, the impact of control variables like wealth and income inequality, and formal regression testing.
Key terms include social capital, fractionalization, trust, regression analysis, GINI coefficient, GDP, and diversity measurement models.
The authors included Rule of Law because it acts as a proxy for good governance, which historical social capital theory (such as Putnam's work) suggests is deeply connected to levels of trust.
The authors concluded that diversity, in general, is not strongly connected to trust; instead, factors like GDP, the GINI coefficient, and the Rule of Law appear to be much more reliable predictors.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

