Masterarbeit, 2011
123 Seiten, Note: 1,0
I. Introduction
A. How the topic was identified
B. The online debate
C. What’s wrong with CSR?
D. Research questions and objectives
II. Theoretical and methodological classification
A. Research approach
a. Theoretical framework
b. Methodology
i. Flexible research design
ii. Integrative literature study
B. Consideration of rejected alternatives
III. Creating Shared Value in the context of CSR theory
A. Definition of CSV and CSR
a. Corporate Social Responsibility
i. CSR in Germany
b. Creating Shared Value
B. Justification of CSR
a. Corporate Citizenship
b. Philanthropy
c. Sustainability
C. Responsibility and power
a. Defining responsibility
b. Responsibility and political power
D. CSV
E. The value of doing good
a. Ethical theory
i. Consequentialist theory
ii. Non-consequentialist theory
iii. Separating right from wrong
F. Is CSV current CSR standard?
a. Products and markets
b. Productivity in the value chain
c. Building supportive industry clusters at the company’s location
IV. Explorative Study
A. Research questions
B. Mixed methods approach
a. Sample size and choice of field
b. Content analysis
c. Interviews
C. Rejection of alternative methods
V. Finding
A. Website content
B. Interviews
C. Unintended findings
VI. Discussion
A. CSV in the context of CSR theory
a. Politics
i. Nestlé: the business example
b. Porter and Kramer vs. Friedman
c. Reinventing capitalism?
B. CSR in Germany with the example of two industries: energy supply and outdoor supply
a. Reputation management
b. Identifying relevant topics
c. Products and markets
d. The value chain
VII. Classifying CSV
A. What is the contribution of CSV to CSR theory?
B. A management model for socially responsible business
C. Limitations of research
D. Areas for further research
VIII. Reflections on learning
A. Becoming a scholar
B. Learning
C. Application of learning
This dissertation aims to critically evaluate Michael Porter and Mark Kramer's concept of "Creating Shared Value" (CSV) against existing theories of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The research seeks to determine whether CSV offers a genuinely new management approach or merely rebrands established CSR practices, and investigates how the distinction between responsive and strategic CSR can be supported in a corporate context.
A. How the topic was identified
Shortly after the release of Michael Porter’s and Mark Kramer’s article Creating Shared Value. How to reinvent capitalism – and unleash a wave of innovation and growth (Porter and Kramer, 2011) in the January/February issue of Harvard Business Review the author read a web post claiming that Porter and Kramer were “obviously not up to date with current CSR development” (Wagner, 2011). It was further suggested they were trying to work on their own consultancy’s reputation by giving a current trend a new name (ibid.). The post provided links to the original article and to Tony Webb’s blog (Webb, 2011), a quite popular online source for those interested in business ethics. After skimming through the texts, the author felt inclined to agree with Porter and Kramer about the problems of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in practice, and she also noticed that the criticism seemed to mainly follow a ‘why do they criticize our work?’-approach.
The question arose whether the CSR professionals were right with their criticism of Creating Shared Value (CSV) or whether CSV really delivered a new approach to responsible management. Having always felt that CSR was mainly a tool used in a business environment that did not believe in social responsibility but wanted to answer stakeholder expectations, the author now wanted to be sure about current trends in CSR. Was there something happening in practice, that academic debate had not yet addressed? Did she just not know about those trends? Were the professionals blind for the weakness of CSR application? Or was it possible that Porter and Kramer had identified exactly the reason why CSR did not work, at least for those who thought it would not work?
I. Introduction: Presents the debate surrounding CSV, outlines the research objectives, and defines the scope of the study.
II. Theoretical and methodological classification: Details the research methodology, including the use of critical rationalism and an integrative literature review.
III. Creating Shared Value in the context of CSR theory: Evaluates definitions of CSV and CSR, discusses justifications like philanthropy and sustainability, and addresses the connection between responsibility and power.
IV. Explorative Study: Describes the empirical research design involving content analysis of corporate websites and qualitative interviews with industry representatives.
V. Finding: Presents the results of the industry analysis, showing how energy and outdoor companies handle CSR communication and strategy.
VI. Discussion: Critically discusses the findings, exploring the practical application of CSV and comparing corporate approaches in the German market.
VII. Classifying CSV: Offers a synthesis of the research, introducing a proposed management model for socially responsible business.
VIII. Reflections on learning: Reflects on the author's personal development and academic journey during the completion of the MBA dissertation.
Creating Shared Value, CSV, Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR, Strategic Management, Sustainability, Corporate Citizenship, Philanthropy, Competitive Advantage, Stakeholder Engagement, Business Ethics, Profit Maximization, Management Model, Social Responsibility, Industrial Analysis.
The dissertation examines the contribution of Michael Porter and Mark Kramer's "Creating Shared Value" (CSV) concept to the existing theoretical framework of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).
Central themes include the evaluation of CSV versus CSR, the business case for social responsibility, the intersection of business and society, and the role of corporate strategy in addressing societal needs.
The primary goal is to determine if CSV is a novel management paradigm or merely a strategic refinement of existing CSR practices, and to assess how managers can effectively balance social and competitive objectives.
The study utilizes a mixed-methods approach, combining an extensive integrative literature review with a qualitative explorative study that includes website content analysis and expert interviews.
The analysis covers the theoretical origins of CSR, ethical models, the role of corporate power in political contexts, and a comparative study of the German energy and outdoor sectors.
The work is characterized by a critical, management-oriented perspective that questions the effectiveness of traditional CSR and explores the practical integration of societal concerns into core business operations.
The author argues that responsibility is intrinsically linked to power, suggesting that in modern society, corporations must be held accountable for their significant political and social influence, not just their economic output.
The author concludes that while CSV is a creative application of existing management principles, it does not fundamentally "reinvent" capitalism, but rather provides a more direct framework for aligning profit with societal interests.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

