Masterarbeit, 2006
48 Seiten, Note: merit
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1. Scope and Research Objectives
1.2. Conceptual Framework, Method and Materials
1.3. Limitations of the Study
1.4. Literature Review
Chapter 2 Climate Change: The reality of a warming planet
2.1. Introduction
2.2. The Tragedy of the Global Commons
2.3. The Science of Climate Change
2.4. Historical Development
2.4.1. Consensus Building
2.4.2. Consolidation of Expert Knowledge
2.4.3. The Road to New York
2.5. Establishment of a Global Climate Regime
Chapter 3 The Precautionary Principle
3.1. Introduction
3.2. The Origin of the Precautionary Principle
3.3. Historical Development
3.4. The Precautionary Principle under Climate Change Regime
3.5. Different Formulations of Precaution
3.6. Criteria for Precautionary Action
3.7. Issues and Defences
3.8. Analysis of the Definition of Precautionary Principle under International Law
3.9. Standard of Proof
Chapter 4 The Precautionary Principle and Climate Change
4.1. Uncertainty factor
4.2. The Precautionary Approach to global warming
4.3. Wait-and-see Approach
4.4. Impacts of Global Warming
4.5. The Role of Global Community
Chapter 5 The Precautionary Principle and International Law
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Sources of international Law
5.3. Customary International Law
5.4. Definition and Elements of International Custom
5.5. Analysis of the Precautionary Principle as Custom
Chapter 6. Conclusions
The primary objective of this work is to explore the role and validity of the precautionary principle within the international legal system, specifically addressing its relevance to climate change mitigation and its potential status as customary international law.
3.9. Standard of Proof
A key issue that is equally controversial in the debates over the precautionary principle is the standard of proof attached to potential risks involving uncertainty. For instance, if a new substance is developed for a particular purpose, what is the level of proof required before the precautionary principle is set in motion? As previously mentioned, Sandin (1999: 7) proposes a degree of evidence in qualitative terms, such as ‘strong scientific evidence’, ‘scientifically supported strong suspicions’, or some versions of the de minimis principle prior to the application of the precautionary principle (See subchapter 3.7). On this point, the European Commission has chosen the standard ‘reasonable grounds for concern’, to wit:
“The Community has consistently endeavoured to achieve a high level of protection, among others in environment and human, animal or plant health. In most cases, measures making it possible to achieve this high level of protection can be determined on a satisfactory scientific basis. However, when there are reasonable grounds for concern that potential hazards may affect the environment or human, animal or plant health, and when at the same time the available data preclude a detailed risk evaluation, the precautionary principle has been politically accepted as a risk management strategy in several fields.” [italics supplied] (EC, 2000: 9)
The EEA (2001: 193), on the other hand, suggested that the proof requirement in specific issues should be based on a number of factors, namely: “size and nature of the potential harm, the claimed benefits, the available alternatives, and the potential costs of being wrong in both directions”.
Chapter 1: This chapter defines the scope, methodology (influenced by legal positivism), and limitations of the research, while also providing a review of the existing literature.
Chapter 2: This chapter outlines the reality of climate change as a global environmental issue, discussing its history, scientific basis, and the tragedy of the global commons.
Chapter 3: This chapter provides an in-depth examination of the precautionary principle, including its origins, various formulations, criteria for action, and the standard of proof required.
Chapter 4: This chapter analyzes the application of the precautionary principle specifically within the context of the climate change regime and the role of the public.
Chapter 5: This chapter investigates the status of the precautionary principle as international customary law by evaluating state practice and opinio juris.
Chapter 6: This chapter concludes that the precautionary principle represents a shift away from traditional wait-and-see approaches and constitutes a significant, emerging norm in international environmental law.
precautionary principle, climate change, international law, customary international law, environmental policy, uncertainty, state practice, opinio juris, sustainable development, greenhouse gases, UNFCCC, Kyoto Protocol, risk management
The work examines the precautionary principle within international law and its specific relevance and application in the context of the global climate change crisis.
Key themes include the legal formulation of the precautionary principle, the scientific uncertainty surrounding global warming, the role of international agreements, and the evaluation of whether the principle has become binding customary international law.
The research seeks to determine the relevance of the precautionary principle under the climate change regime, how it is defined in international conventional law, and whether it has emerged as a binding international custom.
The study is primarily based on legal research influenced by the theory of legal positivism, complemented by a multi-disciplinary approach that includes environmental studies, systems thinking, and interviews with experts.
The main body covers the development of the global climate regime, the history and criteria of the precautionary principle, its integration into international agreements, and a legal analysis of state practice and customary norms.
Important keywords include precautionary principle, climate change, international law, state practice, opinio juris, and customary international law.
The author identifies three fundamental elements: the risk of serious damage to human health or the environment, a lack of absolute certainty, and the requirement for reasonable action to address the threat.
The author argues that the principle does not contradict science; rather, it provides a framework for decision-making in situations where scientific uncertainty exists, and emphasizes that most agreements calling for the principle also mandate further scientific research.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

