Masterarbeit, 2012
56 Seiten, Note: 100
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Change Management.
1.2 Change Leadership.
2.0 Responses of the three levels of employees.
2.1 Employee Survey Results.
2.2 Manager Survey Results.
2.3 Leader Survey Results.
2.4 Interpreting the survey results.
3.0 Is it really resistance?
3.1 Hello! Is anybody listening?????
3.2 It’s the perception, stupid!
3.3 “I don’t have a clue.”
3.4 What are we supposed to do?
3.5 Why should I?
3.6 Not everything a manager sees as resistance is really resistance.
4.0 Forming the plan.
4.1 A new model: PEAKMADE.
4.1.1 P. for the problem.
4.1.2 E. stands for employee involvement.
4.1.3 A. Awareness.
4.1.4 K. stands for knowledge.
4.1.5 M. – the Message.
4.1.6 A. give them the Ability.
4.1.7 D. = DO IT!
4.1.8 E. means to Encourage feedback and Evaluate the results.
5.0 Conclusion.
This project aims to bridge the gap between change management processes and change leadership by analyzing employee perceptions across three levels: general employees, managers, and leadership. The research addresses why business changes often fail due to perceived resistance, communication deficits, and lack of employee involvement, ultimately proposing an actionable, flexible roadmap for successful organizational change.
3.6 Not everything a manager sees as resistance is really Resistance.
The previous few paragraphs listed several reasons why an employee might seem to resist changes. However, in each of these cases, there is an underlying reason for the employee’s actions. There may be some cases of true resistance. There are certain personality types which will create resistance just for the sake of creating resistance.
Since not everyone will have this type of personality trait, managers and administrators need to uncover the true cause of what is perceived as being resistance. The employee may not be properly informed about the change; the employee might also not have the necessary ability to make the change, or any other issue that might occur. If we can proactively address these issues early there is much less chance that they will become forces that will spur resistance. Thus, changes will become a more successful routine within the workplace. The methodology presented herein can eliminate most of the reasons change resistance occurs stated above. This would leave very little true resistance to deal with by utilizing other change resistance management tools. The key is to have a successful change pathway that addresses these issues before resistance can form.
1.0 Introduction: Sets the foundation by defining the necessity of change in business and introducing the distinction between change management and change leadership.
2.0 Responses of the three levels of employees: Presents the methodology and findings of a survey conducted across three tiers of employees to compare their perceptions of organizational change.
3.0 Is it really resistance?: Investigates the root causes of workplace resistance, highlighting that communication and perception gaps are often mistaken for genuine opposition.
4.0 Forming the plan: Introduces the PEAKMADE model, a comprehensive and flexible roadmap that integrates problem definition, employee involvement, and structured execution to ensure change success.
5.0 Conclusion: Synthesizes the core arguments, reiterating that a combined approach using PEAKMADE minimizes resistance and increases the likelihood of sustainable success.
Change Management, Change Leadership, PEAKMADE, Organizational Change, Employee Involvement, Workplace Resistance, Communication, Problem Solving, Survey Results, Employee Perception, Change Strategy, Leadership Models, Business Performance, Human Side of Change, Sustainable Change.
The work focuses on improving the success rate of business changes by combining formal change management processes with change leadership practices, specifically addressing the psychological and practical needs of employees.
The book centers on communication, the gap between management and staff perceptions, the nature of resistance to change, and the necessity of involving employees throughout the entire change process.
The goal is to create a replicable and flexible model, called PEAKMADE, that addresses potential points of failure in organizational change before resistance can even form.
The author uses empirical data gathered through surveys distributed to three distinct levels within an organization—employees, managers, and leadership—to compare perceptions and identify disconnects.
It covers the analysis of survey data, a deep dive into the common misconceptions of "resistance," and a step-by-step breakdown of the PEAKMADE acronym, which serves as a roadmap for change.
The project is defined by terms like Change Management, Change Leadership, PEAKMADE, Employee Involvement, and Organizational Change.
It stands for Problem definition, Employee involvement, Awareness, Knowledge, Message, Ability, DO IT (Execution), and Evaluate results.
The model argues that excluding those who actually do the work from the design phase often leads to failed implementations, as the proposed changes may be unworkable or misaligned with actual job roles.
By proactively addressing communication gaps, providing clear reasons for changes, ensuring proper training (Ability), and fostering an environment where feedback is welcomed rather than viewed as resistance.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

