Wither Power Politics?

Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION

2. OFFENSIVE REALISM

2.1 Bedrock Assumptions

2.2 States’ Operational Goals

2.3 Behavioral Models for States Under Anarchic Conditions

3. LITERATURE REVIEW

4. TIMELINE: 1991-1994

4.1 Introduction

4.2 The Phantom Superpower

4.3 Russia’s Southern Belt

4.4 The Democracy Project

4.5 Putting Russia First

4.6 The New Great (Energy) Game

4.7 Pipeline Politics

4.8 US Military Command and the Caspian Sea Region

4.9 Appeasement, Blackmail and Democracy

4.10 Nagorno-Karabakh

4.11 The Tajik Civil War

5. TIMELINE: 1995-2001

5.1 Introduction

5.2 NATO and the Security Dilemma

5.3 Toward an Eurasian Corridor

5.4 The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline: A Strategic Imperative

5.5 Kazakhstan

5.6 Reshuffling the Caspian Team

5.7 Evidence of Balancing

5.8 Enter China

6. CONCLUSION

Research Objective and Thematic Focus

This thesis examines the United States' foreign policy toward the Caspian Sea Region between 1991 and 2001 to determine if these policies were aligned with Offensive Realist principles designed to advance national security. The study investigates whether US engagement was governed by a focus on liberal principles and democratic expansion, or by strategic balance-of-power considerations in a region emerging from the Soviet collapse.

• Application of Offensive Realism to assess US foreign policy and its regional impact.
• Evaluation of the "Russia First" strategy and its compatibility with security objectives.
• Analysis of the "New Great Game" in the context of energy resources and pipelines.
• Investigation of the effectiveness of US support for democratization and human rights in the region.
• Assessment of the geopolitical challenges posed by Russia's reasserted influence and China's entry into the region.

Excerpt from the Book

Summary of Chapters

1. INTRODUCTION: Outlines the theoretical scope and identifies the historical struggle of defining the US role in international politics, specifically regarding the Caspian region.

2. OFFENSIVE REALISM: Details the theoretical framework, emphasizing the role of anarchy, power maximization, and regional hegemony in defining state behavior.

3. LITERATURE REVIEW: Surveys existing academic perspectives on the Caspian region, positioning this thesis within the discourse of great power competition.

4. TIMELINE: 1991-1994: Analyzes the immediate post-Soviet era, focusing on the "Russia First" policy and the resulting strategic passivity of the US toward the Caspian.

5. TIMELINE: 1995-2001: Explores the shift toward more active engagement, driven by energy interests, and the emergence of competing security frameworks like the SCO and GUAM.

6. CONCLUSION: Synthesizes the evidence to demonstrate how the denial of Realist logic and the pursuit of idealistic objectives hindered US strategic security interests.

Keywords

Offensive Realism, Caspian Sea Region, US Foreign Policy, Great Power Competition, Russia, New Great Game, Energy Security, Pipeline Politics, Democracy Promotion, National Security Strategy, Balance of Power, Geopolitics, Central Asia, Caucasus, Hegemony.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the fundamental focus of this thesis?

This work evaluates US foreign policy toward the Caspian Sea region between 1991 and 2001, applying the theoretical lens of Offensive Realism to understand whether US decisions prioritized national security or ideological goals.

What are the primary themes explored in the study?

Key themes include the impact of US "Russia First" policies, the competition for regional control over oil and gas, the strategic relevance of pipeline infrastructure, and the challenges to regional stability following the Soviet collapse.

What is the primary research goal?

The goal is to determine if US policies in the Caspian were effective in securing national interests or if they inadvertently allowed for the re-emergence of rivals and the destabilization of the regional balance of power.

Which scientific methodology is utilized?

The author employs John J. Mearsheimer’s theory of Offensive Realism, treating international politics as an anarchic system where states strive for regional hegemony to ensure survival.

What aspects of the regional geopolitical environment are covered?

The book covers the transition of the former Soviet republics, Russia's efforts to maintain its sphere of influence, the entry of China into regional affairs, and the impact of domestic US legislation like the FREEDOM Support Act.

Which concepts are used to define the study's characterization?

Central concepts include the "New Great Game," "offshore balancing," "potential hegemon," "security dilemma," and "buck-passing."

How does the author analyze the role of Turkey in the region?

The author examines Turkey’s attempts to export a secular democratic model to the Caspian and its role as a potential partner for US interests, constrained by economic fragility and US political limitations.

What conclusion does the author draw regarding US strategy in the 1990s?

The author concludes that the US failure to acknowledge Realist power dynamics and its reliance on idealistic notions of "win-win" politics enabled Russia to reassert dominance and marginalized Western influence.