Masterarbeit, 2012
84 Seiten, Note: 1,3
The first chapter introduces the purpose and scope of the paper. The second chapter delves into the theoretical concept of overconfidence, focusing on its definition, manifestation in managerial settings, and critiques. Chapter three examines the sources of overconfidence, exploring various influencing factors such as age, education, gender, cultural background, task familiarity, feedback, and situational factors. The fourth chapter discusses the implications of overconfidence, covering its impact on areas such as the better-than-average effect and its ramifications for finance, entrepreneurship, and management.
Chapter five presents the motivation for the research, discussing empirical and experimental evidence related to the relationship between education and overconfidence. Chapter six introduces dual process theory as a framework for understanding overconfidence, highlighting the concept of dual reasoning, its differences, and its connection to overconfidence. Chapter seven outlines the experimental approach used in the study, including the hypothesis, preliminary considerations, experimental setup, additional testing, and interpretation of results.
The thesis argues that different fields of education create mindsets that affect overconfidence. Quantitative fields (math, physics) may hamper it, while qualitative fields (law, humanities) may increase proneness to it.
Dual process theory suggests that human reasoning involves two systems. The thesis uses this framework to explain how different types of training and reasoning styles impact overconfidence levels.
Key influencing factors include age, gender, education, cultural background, task familiarity, and situational factors like feedback and the importance of the topic.
Overconfidence has significant ramifications for security trading, mergers and acquisitions (M&A), and corporate investment strategies, often leading to biased risk assessments.
It is a common manifestation of overconfidence where individuals tend to overestimate their own qualities and abilities relative to others, frequently observed in managerial settings.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

