Hausarbeit, 2013
79 Seiten, Note: 1,7
1 Introduction
2 Fundamentals of Business Process Management
2.1 Definitions
2.2 Lifecycle and Objectives
2.3 Modelling Languages and Software Tools
3 Methodology
3.1 Literature Review
3.2 Questionnaire Design and Implementation
3.3 Cluster Analysis
4 Current Implementation Level of Business Process Management
4.1 Data Clean-up and Transformation
4.2 Socio-demographic Analysis
4.3 Quantitative Analysis
4.4 Cluster Analysis
5 Conclusion
This study aims to investigate the current implementation status of Business Process Management (BPM) within German corporate practice by bridging the gap between theoretical academic research and practical operational application. The primary research objective is to analyze how BPM software tools and methodologies are utilized in daily business operations, identify functional usage patterns, and segment user groups through quantitative cluster analysis.
1 Introduction
Against the background of an organisation’s (global) network and the intense competition the corporate conditions underlie a continuous change. This change leads to business processes and the resulting benefits that are only achieved for a limited time. Therefore, continuous optimisation of business processes is essential for overall business success (cf. PwC 2011; Softselect 2010, 9). Especially in the current volatile market environment in the European Union, concerning the debt crisis, companies are looking for ways to adapt their organisation to market conditions and customers' requests (cf. Maass 2010). Industry-independent, companies assign process management related to integrated information technology systems a high value for achieving successful business performance (cf. Gartner 2009, 4; Mainzer 2010, 72-73).
The management consultancy PwC (2011, 12) conducted a survey with 239 German and Austrian executives with relevant expertise and decision-making power. 73% of respondents agreed with the proposition that the future of Business Process Management (BPM) plays a leading role in achieving the company's business goals. More than 85% of respondents see the continuous improvement of existing processes as a necessity for the preservation of their own competitiveness. In Addition, Gartner (2009, 4) presents a survey of 1500 chief information officers that ranked “improving business processes” in first place (4 years in a row), asked for the priority in business improvements by information technology (IT).
From this perspective, the absolute relevance of the subject area is derived. Although, BPM was conceived in research in the early 90s and used in practice from the mid 90s (cf. Hammer/Champy 1993). The continuing strong interest in BPM results from its immense advantages. Likewise, BPM often represents theoretical and technical concepts that are not implementable in corporate practice. As a result benefits of BPM and sustainable performance are not ensured due to realisation issues.
1 Introduction: This chapter establishes the relevance of Business Process Management (BPM) in volatile market environments and outlines the research objective, which focuses on the actual operational implementation of BPM.
2 Fundamentals of Business Process Management: This section provides necessary definitions, explores the BPM lifecycle, and discusses various modelling languages and software tools required for a comprehensive BPM approach.
3 Methodology: The chapter details the systematic research approach, including the literature review, questionnaire design, and the statistical methods used for the subsequent cluster analysis.
4 Current Implementation Level of Business Process Management: This core chapter evaluates the primary data, presenting findings on socio-demographics, software tool usage, KPI application, and the identification of user clusters.
5 Conclusion: The final chapter summarizes the key findings, identifies the limitations of the current study, and proposes directions for future research regarding BPM and the utilization of office software tools.
Business Process Management, BPM, Corporate Practice, Process Modelling, Software Tools, Quantitative Analysis, Cluster Analysis, BPM Implementation, Process Efficiency, KPI, Modelling Languages, Literature Review, Survey, BPM Lifecycle, Operational Management.
The research examines the practical implementation level of Business Process Management (BPM) within German companies, focusing on how organizations use BPM software and methodologies in their daily operations.
Key themes include the actual usage of modelling tools, the purpose of process documentation, the integration of KPIs into process management, and the identification of different categories of BPM users.
The primary goal is to fill the gap between academic theory and corporate practice by providing a quantitative analysis of how companies across various industries and sizes currently implement BPM.
The study employs a mixed-method approach: a systematic literature review followed by a quantitative questionnaire-based survey, which is then analyzed using a two-step cluster analysis to identify user segments.
It covers fundamental BPM definitions and lifecycles, details the research design, presents the survey results regarding software and process usage, and provides a segmentation of user behaviors based on cluster analysis.
The work is best characterized by terms such as BPM, corporate practice, process modelling, software tools, cluster analysis, and quantitative research.
The sample consists of 70 evaluable responses from German companies across various sectors, providing a cross-sectional view of both BPM users and non-users.
The study reveals that MS Office tools are the most widely used applications for process modelling across all company sizes, even though they lack standard BPM features compared to specialized software.
The clusters identified are "BPM Refusenik", "BPM Professionals", "Office Users", and "BPM Implementers", each categorized by their unique approaches to process management and their future intentions.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

