Magisterarbeit, 2012
36 Seiten, Note: B
SECTION 1: THE CHANGING NATURE OF RECRUITING
1.1: Introduction to social recruiting
SECTION 2: DIFFERENTIATING FEATURES OF SOCIAL RECRUITING
2.1 Active and passive candidates
2.1.1InMail
2.1.2 WWU
2.1.3 JYMBII
2.2 Talent pools vs. Talent communities
2.3 Social matching and referral recruiting
SECTION 3: THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL RECRUITING
3.1 Cost per hire
3.2 Quality of hire
3.3 Time to hire
SECTION 4: SOCIAL RECRUITING CONCERNS
4.1: Disparate impact and disparate treatment
4.2: Online Misrepresentation
4.3: Privacy
SECTION 5: MITIGATING SOCIAL RECRUITING RISKS
SECTION 6: RECOMMENDED SOCIAL RECRUITING STRATEGY
SECTION 7: CONCLUSION
The primary objective of this study is to examine the shift from traditional to social recruiting methods, evaluating the benefits, risks, and strategic implications of using social media platforms for talent acquisition. The paper investigates how organizations can leverage social networking to optimize recruitment outcomes while addressing associated challenges such as privacy and discrimination.
Section 2: Differentiating features of Social Recruiting
In 1997, McKinsey & Company (cited in Sullivan 2012) coined the term “war for talent” to mean intense competition among recruiters, organisations regularly raiding each other for talent and bidding for top talent is commonplace. According to Sullivan (2012) organisations should begin planning for this next round of talent wars. This is reflected in the 2012 Jobvite survey, where 62% of respondents said they use passive candidate recruiting - above better benefits 53%, flexible hours 47% and faster hiring process 42% - to stay ahead of their competitors. The advent of social professional networks and the rising emphasis on recruiting ‘passive’ instead of ‘active’ talent has rendered the nature of recruiting and the focus on cultivating candidate relationships competitive like never before.
Social recruiting undeniably serves an incredible opportunity for recruiters to engage and target active and passive candidates, “one of the primary differences between a good and a great recruiting source is the ratio of passive over active prospects that populate it” (Sullivan 2012). Active candidates are typically considered to compromise of unemployed demographic of society, however ‘active’ does not necessarily refer to the unemployed, candidates can be employed but unhappy with their current position or nearing the end of a contract and seeking a new employment opportunity. Despite active candidates only making up about 20% of the talent pool, the majority of traditional recruitment products and services were only designed with active candidates in mind and overlooked the ‘passive’ candidate pools. A passive candidate is one who is “currently working but curious about what’s out there” (Joos 2008, p.105). They make up approximately 80% of the fully-employed workforce and they are found the easiest on Linkedin, “these employed and not-looking individuals comprise the majority of Linkedin members” (Sullivan 2012).
SECTION 1: THE CHANGING NATURE OF RECRUITING: This chapter defines recruitment and explores the historical transition from traditional "post and pray" methods to modern, social-media-enhanced talent acquisition.
SECTION 2: DIFFERENTIATING FEATURES OF SOCIAL RECRUITING: This section details how social media enables the engagement of passive candidates and the building of interactive talent communities compared to static databases.
SECTION 3: THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL RECRUITING: An analysis of how social recruiting positively influences key performance metrics, specifically cost-per-hire, quality-of-hire, and time-to-hire.
SECTION 4: SOCIAL RECRUITING CONCERNS: This chapter highlights the risks associated with social recruiting, focusing on legal discrimination issues, online misrepresentation, and data privacy.
SECTION 5: MITIGATING SOCIAL RECRUITING RISKS: This chapter provides practical suggestions for HR professionals to manage risks by standardizing processes and maintaining compliance with labor laws.
SECTION 6: RECOMMENDED SOCIAL RECRUITING STRATEGY: This section outlines the necessary steps for implementing a sustainable social recruiting strategy, including resource allocation and measurement.
SECTION 7: CONCLUSION: A final synthesis that reinforces the necessity of integrating social recruiting into modern HR strategies to maintain a competitive advantage in talent acquisition.
Social media, Social networking, Recruitment strategy, Linkedin, Talent acquisition, Passive candidates, Talent communities, Cost per hire, Quality of hire, Time to hire, Recruitment performance, Employer branding, Digital recruiting, HR management.
The paper examines the transformative impact of social media on global recruitment practices, highlighting how organizations are shifting from traditional methods to social recruiting to find and attract talent.
Key themes include the differences between active and passive candidate sourcing, the benefits of building talent communities, the impact on hiring metrics, and the legal/ethical risks associated with using social media in HR.
The study aims to provide organizations with a comprehensive understanding of why social recruiting is essential for competitive advantage and how to develop a sustainable strategy to mitigate potential risks.
The findings are based on secondary research, including academic journals, reports from leading social recruiting solution companies, and various organizational case studies.
The main body evaluates the shift in recruitment paradigms, the use of specialized LinkedIn tools like InMail and JYMBII, the measurement of recruitment success, and the mitigation of risks related to discrimination and privacy.
The study is best defined by terms such as social media, talent acquisition, recruitment strategy, passive candidates, and employer branding.
Talent pools are characterized as traditional, static databases of candidate names, whereas talent communities are described as interactive, two-way forums that foster ongoing engagement between employers and potential hires.
The author highlights three primary LinkedIn solutions: InMail for direct private messaging, Work with us (WWU) advertisements on employee profiles, and the "Jobs you may be interested in" (JYMBII) matching algorithm.
The author warns that exclusive use of social media may lead to "disparate impact," potentially excluding specific demographics and exposing the organization to legal risks regarding discrimination laws.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

