Bachelorarbeit, 2010
46 Seiten, Note: 2,0
Didaktik für das Fach Englisch - Pädagogik, Sprachwissenschaft
1. Introduction
2. The Reign of King Alfred the Great
2.1 The General Situation in Wessex
2.2 The Viking Threat during King Alfred’s Reign
3. The Reign of King Ethelred the Unready
3.1 The General Situation in the Anglo-Saxon Kingdom
3.2 The Viking Threat during King Ethelred’s Reign
4. Actions against the Viking Threat
4.1 Military Strategies
4.1.1 Alfred’s Military Strategies
4.1.2 Ethelred’s Military Strategies
4.2 Political Actions
4.2.1 Alfred’s Political Actions
4.2.2 Ethelred’s Political Actions
4.3 The Role of the Church and Learning in the Fight against the Vikings
4.3.1 The Role of the Church and Learning during Alfred’s Reign
4.3.2 The Role of the Church and Learning during Ethelred’s Reign
5. The Kings’ Legacies
5.1 The Cult of Alfred the Great
5.2 The Bad Reputation of Ethelred the Unready
6. Conclusion
This study aims to investigate the disparity between the historical reputations of King Alfred the Great and King Ethelred the Unready, specifically analyzing how their respective responses to the Viking threat shaped their legacies as successful leaders or national failures.
4.1.2. Ethelred’s Military Strategies
While Alfred the Great is regarded as a successful military leader and warrior, Ethelred the Unready is known as a king who was not able to develop an effective strategy against the Viking threat. Richard Abels expresses the reason for Ethelred’s military problems as follows: “When the Vikings suddenly returned in 980, they found a peaceful and wealthy England ripe for pillaging. It was certainly a well-administered, or at least a highly administered, kingdom […] But one must not mistake bureaucratic efficiency and ideological sophistication for military strength. It was in this aspect of governance that Æthelred’s England fell short.”
Ethelred the Unready reigned for 37 years, so it is impossible to make out one specific strategy which the king adopted in his fight against the Vikings. His military measures changed over the years since the king’s proceeding depended on different external circumstances. This is why the development of Ethelred’s military tactics from the beginning until the end of his reign will be examined in the following.
Unlike Alfred the Great, King Ethelred II relied on mercenaries in his fight against the Vikings. As mentioned above, he decided to use part of the invading forces as mercenaries in the winter of 993/994. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle mentions a treaty between Ethelred and the Viking leader Olaf Tryggvason, which established a permanent peace between the two parties.
1. Introduction: Outlines the contrasting historical reputations of King Alfred and King Ethelred and the central research question regarding the validity of these perceptions.
2. The Reign of King Alfred the Great: Provides an overview of Alfred’s accession, the precarious state of Wessex, and the initial Viking threat he encountered.
3. The Reign of King Ethelred the Unready: Discusses the succession conflict, the internal challenges during Ethelred’s reign, and the renewed Viking pressure at the turn of the millennium.
4. Actions against the Viking Threat: Offers a deep dive into the specific military, political, and ecclesiastical strategies employed by both kings to defend their realms.
5. The Kings’ Legacies: Analyzes the construction of historical memory, contrasting the 'Cult of Alfred' with the 'Bad Reputation' attributed to Ethelred by later historians.
6. Conclusion: Synthesizes the findings, arguing that historical context and source bias have heavily influenced our understanding of both monarchs.
Alfred the Great, Ethelred the Unready, Vikings, Anglo-Saxon, Wessex, Viking raids, military strategy, political reform, ecclesiastical history, Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, historiography, Danelaw, Eadric Streona, moral purification, primary sources.
The work examines the reigns of King Alfred the Great and King Ethelred the Unready, specifically focusing on their divergent leadership strategies during the Viking invasions of England.
The book centers on comparative military defense, political administration, the intersection of religion and learning, and a critical analysis of historical source material.
The study seeks to determine whether the contrasting reputations of Alfred as a 'Great' king and Ethelred as an 'Unready' failure are historically justified or the result of biased contemporary reporting.
The author employs a comparative historical approach, analyzing primary sources such as the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle and legal charters alongside modern scholarly reassessments.
The main body details the kings' military responses, the political use of mercenaries and treaties, their respective educational and ecclesiastical reform programs, and the long-term historical reception of their reigns.
Key terms include Alfred the Great, Ethelred the Unready, Viking raids, military history, political administration, Anglo-Saxon society, and source criticism.
It is viewed as a pivotal moment that cemented Ethelred’s reputation for cruelty and served as a potential catalyst for intensified retaliatory Viking invasions.
While Alfred was committed to educational and religious reform, he was also a pragmatist who did not hesitate to utilize church land and wealth to fund military defense and infrastructure like the burghs.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

