Masterarbeit, 2013
58 Seiten, Note: 1.0
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Aims
1.2. Relevance
1.3. Structure
2. THE FAMILY FIRM
2.1. The F-PEC scale
2.1.1. The power dimension
2.1.2. The experience dimension
2.1.3. The culture dimension
2.2. The F-PAC scale – resume
2.3. Usage
2.4. Theories used in family firm research
2.4.1. The agency theory
2.4.2. The stewardship theory
2.4.3. Resource based view
2.5. The family firm – resume
3. ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE
3.1. Organizational culture – according to Edgar H. Schein
3.1.1. Schein’s levels of culture
3.2. Organizational culture – according to Mats Alvesson
3.3. Organizational culture – according to Joanne Martin
4. CHARACTERISTICS OF A FAMILY FIRMS’ ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE
4.1. The role of the founder
4.2. The strength of culture
4.3. Entrepreneurship and the family firm
4.3.1. Short- vs. long-term orientation
4.3.2. Individual vs. group cultural orientation
4.3.3. Internal vs. external cultural orientation
4.3.4. Coordination vs. control
4.4. Organizational culture and performance
4.5. Family systems’ influence on family firms
5. HYPOTHESES APPLICATION
6. CONCLUSION
7. LIMITATIONS
8. PERSONAL OPINION
This thesis aims to provide a comprehensive theoretical framework for conducting empirical studies on the relationship between family businesses and their organizational culture. The central research objective is to synthesize literature on family firm definitions, organizational culture theories, and the interplay between family systems and business structures to facilitate future empirical investigations.
3.1.1. Schein’s levels of culture
As mentioned above, Schein (2010) describes that culture can be analysed at different levels. Level, he states, is the degree to which the cultural phenomenon is visible to the observer. “These levels range from the very tangible overt manifestations that you can see and feel to the deeply embedded, unconscious, basic assumptions that I am defining as the essence of culture.” (Schein 2010, p.23) He ads that the basic assumptions are usually taken for granted by group members and are non-negotiable.
Group learning reflects someone’s original beliefs and values, his or her sense of what ought to be, as distinct from what is in reality. The first solution proposed in a group to deal with new tasks, issues or problems reflects an individual’s own assumptions about what is right or wrong, what may work or not. Those who can influence the group to adopt a certain approach will be identified as leaders or founders. Still, the group does not yet have shared group knowledge because it has not yet taken common action in reference to whatever it is supposed to do. (Schein 2010)
Schein continuous this explanation with the following example: “(…) if sales begin to decline in a young business, a manager may say, “We must increase advertising” because of her belief that advertising always increases sales. The group, never having experienced this situation before, will hear that assertion as a statement of that manager’s beliefs and values: “She believes that when one is in trouble it is a good thing to increase advertising.” What the leader initially proposes, therefore, cannot have any status other than a value to be questioned, debated, challenged, and tested.
1. INTRODUCTION: Outlines the aims of the thesis, the relevance of family businesses in the global economy, and the overall structure of the research.
2. THE FAMILY FIRM: Examines the definition dilemma of family firms, introduces the F-PEC scale, and discusses foundational theories like agency theory, stewardship theory, and the resource-based view.
3. ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: Provides an overview of organizational culture perspectives based on the works of Schein, Alvesson, and Martin, highlighting different ways to conceptualize and study culture.
4. CHARACTERISTICS OF A FAMILY FIRMS’ ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: Connects cultural theory to family business realities, focusing on the role of the founder, cultural strength, entrepreneurship, and the impact of the family system.
5. HYPOTHESES APPLICATION: Proposes practical ways to apply the constructed hypotheses within future empirical studies, categorized by the research focus.
6. CONCLUSION: Summarizes the theoretical framework and acknowledges the challenges of empirically studying the intersection of family and business systems.
7. LIMITATIONS: Discusses the inherent difficulties in building a valid framework due to the lack of uniform definitions and the potential for subjective interpretation.
8. PERSONAL OPINION: Offers personal reflections based on the author's upbringing in a family firm and concludes on the metaphor of the firm as a body with a "soul."
Family business, Organizational culture, F-PEC scale, Agency theory, Stewardship theory, Resource based view, Entrepreneurship, Founder, Cultural strength, Family systems, Relational contracts, Human capital, Social capital, Patient financial capital, Organizational performance
The thesis explores the intersection of organizational culture and family business, focusing on how unique family-related dynamics influence the culture, performance, and entrepreneurial behavior of the firm.
The main themes include defining family firms, understanding organizational culture through established frameworks, exploring the role of founders, and analyzing the impact of the family system on business operations.
The objective is to establish a robust theoretical background and a framework of hypotheses that can guide future empirical studies on family firm cultures.
The work utilizes a literature-based, qualitative approach, synthesizing existing academic research to construct hypotheses that characterize family firms versus non-family firms.
The main body addresses theories of family firm research, organizational culture frameworks, the characteristics of family firm culture, and the systemic paradoxes inherent in family-owned businesses.
Key terms include family business, organizational culture, F-PEC scale, agency theory, stewardship theory, entrepreneurship, and family system paradoxes.
The author notes the lack of a universal definition but uses the F-PEC scale as a key tool for measuring family influence through power, experience, and culture dimensions.
Agency theory focuses on self-serving behaviors and control mechanisms, whereas stewardship theory emphasizes collectivistic, pro-organizational behavior based on trust and shared values.
Paradoxes include conflicts between family emotions and business task-orientation, historical traditions versus the need for innovation, and the balancing of shareholder profit goals with family survival needs.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

