Animal cruelty, criminology and prosecution. An assessment on animal abuse and animal law in Nepal

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

1.1 Background

1.1.1 Animal Cruelty

1.1.2 Criminology

1.1.3 Prosecution

1.2 Justification of Study

1.3 Objective

1.3.1 General Objective

1.3.2 Specific Objective

3. Methodology

3.1 Initial Scoping Phase

3.2 Cross-Referencing

3.3 Data Collection

3.3.1 Questionnaire Survey

3.3.2 Site Survey

3.3.3 Observation

3.4 Data Analysis

4. Results and discussion

4.1 Response

4.1.1 Gender of the Respondents

4.1.2 Work Designation of Respondents

4.2 Analysis of the Data through tabulation

4.3 Discussion

4.3.1 Survey and Interview

4.3.1. 1 National Forensic Science Laboratory, Khumaltar, Lalitpur

4.3.1.2 Hospitals

4.3.1.3 Traffic Police Office

4.3.1.4 Police Stations

4.3.1.5 Interview of the Lawyer (Court)

4.3.2 Observation

5. Conclusions

Research Objectives and Focus Areas

This study aims to assess the current landscape of animal cruelty, associated criminological factors, and the status of legal prosecution in Nepal. By gathering empirical data through surveys among veterinarians and site observations at key institutions, the research seeks to identify systemic gaps in law enforcement and public awareness to provide actionable recommendations for legal and societal improvements.

• Prevalence and common types of animal abuse in Nepal.
• Evaluation of existing animal protection laws and their enforcement.
• Knowledge, attitudes, and reporting practices of veterinarians regarding animal cruelty.
• Assessment of institutional responses to animal crime, including police and judicial handling.

Excerpt from the Book

Summary of Chapters

1. Introduction: This chapter establishes the background, definitions of animal categories, importance of animals, and the current pathetic conditions of animal welfare in Nepal, while stating the research objectives.

3. Methodology: This section details the three-tier review process, which included literature scoping, cross-referencing, questionnaire surveys for veterinarians, site surveys, and direct observations.

4. Results and discussion: This comprehensive chapter presents the analyzed survey data, including respondent demographics and findings on abuse prevalence, alongside discussions with relevant professionals and field observations.

5. Conclusions: The final chapter summarizes the study's findings on the increasing trend of animal violence and provides clear suggestions for legal reform, public education, and improved investigation training.

Keywords

Animal cruelty, animal abuse, criminology, animal law, prosecution, animal welfare, animal rights, veterinary survey, Nepal, neglect, intentional cruelty, animal crime, forensic science, public awareness, animal protection.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core focus of this research paper?

The paper focuses on the current state of animal cruelty in Nepal, examining the intersection between animal abuse, criminological perspectives, and the legal prosecution of such offenses.

What are the primary thematic areas covered?

The primary themes include the classification of animal cruelty, the status of animals in Nepal, legal frameworks for animal protection, and the attitudes of veterinary professionals towards these issues.

What is the ultimate objective of the study?

The goal is to assess the current status of animal cruelty, criminology, and prosecution in Nepal, and to offer evidence-based recommendations to mitigate animal abuse.

Which scientific methodology was utilized?

The study employed a three-tier methodology: initial scoping of literature, cross-referencing academic sources, and primary data collection through questionnaire surveys, site visits, and institutional interviews.

What topics are explored in the main body?

The main body investigates specific cases of animal cruelty, respondent demographics, the perceived adequacy of existing laws, and findings from interviews with forensic experts, police, and legal professionals.

Which keywords characterize this work?

Key terms include animal cruelty, criminology, animal law, prosecution, animal welfare, and animal rights, among others.

How do respondents perceive the current animal protection laws?

Over 95% of respondents feel that current punishment amounts and durations are insufficient, and over 97% advocate for the remodeling of existing animal laws.

What role does the National Forensic Science Laboratory play according to the research?

The laboratory examines samples related to illegal activities involving wild animals; however, researchers noted that issues with improper packing and labeling of samples often hinder effective legal prosecution.

Are there specific observations regarding police response in Nepal?

Police officers indicated that data on animal cruelty is rarely recorded, as most incidents are settled through mutual understanding between the involved parties rather than formal legal processes.