Forschungsarbeit, 2014
25 Seiten
This paper aims to explore the nature and types of theory, examining the relationship between theory and research, and identifying theoretical directions for research contribution. It analyzes differing perspectives on defining and building theory, particularly within the context of business and scientific inquiry.
Introduction: This introductory chapter sets the stage for the paper by posing crucial questions about the role and nature of theory in scientific investigation and business practice. It highlights the ongoing debate about the precise definition of theory and its connection to empirical research, emphasizing the importance of understanding different theoretical perspectives to navigate this complexity. The chapter lays out the paper's structure, promising a review of existing literature on theory, a differentiation of theory from related concepts, an exploration of the theory-research relationship, and a discussion of implications for short-term liquidity theory.
Literature Review: This chapter delves into the existing academic literature on the definition of theory, presenting a range of perspectives and opinions. It introduces three main themes regarding the nature of theory: the concept of minitheories, the essential ingredients of a good theory according to Gelso (2006), and the contrasting positivist and post-positivist paradigms of knowledge creation (Stem, 2007; Goduks, 2012). The chapter explores various definitions of theory, highlighting the contributions of scholars like Gelso, Stem, Henderikus, Wacker, and Corley and Gioia. It discusses the concept of minitheories as components of broader theories, using the example of liquidity ratios theory within financial analysis. The chapter also examines Gelso's (2006) suggested ingredients for a good scientific theory, including descriptive ability, explanatory power, heuristic value, testability, integration, parsimony, clarity, comprehensiveness, and delimitation. Finally, it contrasts the positivist and post-positivist viewpoints on theory, emphasizing the theory-laden nature of observations and the implications for research methodology.
Theory, theory-building, minitheories, positivist, post-positivist, research methodology, empirical research, scientific inquiry, business applications, liquidity ratios, financial analysis, model, paradigm, hypothesis.
This document provides a comprehensive preview of a research paper, including the table of contents, objectives and key themes, chapter summaries, and keywords. It aims to give the reader a thorough understanding of the paper's scope and content before reading the full text.
The literature review explores various aspects of theory, including its definition, relationship with research, and different approaches to theory building. It examines concepts such as "minitheories," the characteristics of a good theory (according to Gelso, 2006), and contrasting positivist and post-positivist paradigms (Stem, 2007; Goduks, 2012). Key scholars discussed include Gelso, Stem, Henderikus, Wacker, and Corley and Gioia.
The paper aims to explore the nature and types of theory, examine the relationship between theory and research, and identify theoretical directions for research contribution. It analyzes differing perspectives on defining and building theory, particularly within the context of business and scientific inquiry. Specific objectives include defining and classifying different types of theories, exploring the theory-research relationship, identifying the characteristics of a "good" theory, contrasting positivist and post-positivist approaches, and applying theory to the measurement of firm liquidity.
The paper's key themes revolve around the definition and classification of theories, the connection between theory and research, the criteria for a "good" theory, contrasting theoretical paradigms (positivist and post-positivist), and the application of theoretical frameworks to practical contexts, specifically the measurement of firm liquidity.
The paper is structured into an introduction, a literature review, and a discussion and findings section. The introduction sets the stage, outlining the paper's purpose and structure. The literature review delves into existing research on theory, while the discussion and findings section presents the paper's conclusions.
The introduction establishes the importance of understanding theory in scientific investigation and business practice and outlines the paper's scope. The literature review examines existing literature on theory, presenting different perspectives and exploring concepts like minitheories, characteristics of a good theory, and contrasting theoretical paradigms.
Keywords include: Theory, theory-building, minitheories, positivist, post-positivist, research methodology, empirical research, scientific inquiry, business applications, liquidity ratios, financial analysis, model, paradigm, hypothesis.
The paper applies theoretical concepts to the measurement of firm liquidity, demonstrating the practical application of theoretical frameworks in a specific business context (financial analysis).
The preview doesn't detail the specific implications of short-term liquidity theory, but it suggests that this is a topic explored within the broader context of the theory-research relationship and application of theoretical frameworks.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!
Kommentare