Masterarbeit, 2004
55 Seiten, Note: 2 (B)
This dissertation examines the United States and European responses to global terrorism in the wake of the September 11th attacks. It analyzes the different approaches taken by both sides, specifically focusing on the "War Fighting" and "Crime Fighting" strategies. The dissertation explores the reasons for these divergent strategies and assesses their effectiveness in combating terrorism.
The preface provides a brief overview of the dissertation's context and motivation, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the "war on terror" and the evolving transatlantic relationship. The introduction establishes the context of the post-Cold War era and the emergence of new security threats, including terrorism.
Chapter 1 analyzes the shifting security landscape in the post-Cold War era, exploring the emergence of terrorism as a significant threat and contrasting the "War Fighting" and "Crime Fighting" approaches to counterterrorism.
Chapter 2 examines the US response to global terrorism, focusing on the "National Security Strategy of the United States" and the defense vision of Donald Rumsfeld. It also explores the development of homeland security measures.
Chapter 3 delves into the European response to terrorism, examining the role of the Justice and Home Affairs framework, the "export" of European counterterrorism experiences, and the emphasis on diplomacy and development.
Chapter 4 analyzes the differences between the US and European responses to terrorism, exploring the reasons for these divergences and assessing their effectiveness in combating terrorism. It also considers alternative approaches to counterterrorism.
The key keywords and focus topics of this dissertation include: counterterrorism, global terrorism, post-Cold War security, War Fighting, Crime Fighting, transatlantic relations, US national security strategy, European security, diplomacy and development, and effectiveness of counterterrorism measures.
The US often follows a 'War Fighting' approach based on military strength, while Europe tends toward a 'Crime Fighting' approach focusing on law enforcement, diplomacy, and development.
The US view is described as Hobbesian (security through force), whereas the European view is Kantian (security through 'perpetual peace' and normative principles).
It demonstrated that even military superpowers are vulnerable to asymmetric attacks by small groups, shifting the focus to homeland security and global terror networks.
Europe emphasizes addressing the root causes of terrorism through diplomatic engagement, international law, and economic development aid.
The paper argues that while military force is easier to deploy, it may reinforce the unjust world order that causes terrorism, potentially making it more dangerous in the long run.
It is a key policy document outlining the US outward-oriented approach, which include preemptive strikes and maintaining military superiority.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

