Masterarbeit, 2014
58 Seiten, Note: B
Jura - Europarecht, Völkerrecht, Internationales Privatrecht
This dissertation investigates the UK's relationship with the European Union, specifically exploring the potential for withdrawal and alternative models of engagement. It aims to analyze the legal implications of EU supremacy on the UK's legal system, the process of withdrawal, and the various options available for future relations. The study also assesses the potential economic and political consequences of different scenarios.
Chapter 1 introduces the scope and objectives of the dissertation, providing an overview of the research question and its relevance. Chapter 2 delves into the historical development of the EU and its impact on the UK's legal system. It examines the principle of EU supremacy and its implications for UK law. Chapter 3 explores the advantages and disadvantages of the UK's membership in the EU, considering the potential benefits and drawbacks of withdrawal. This chapter also analyzes the process of withdrawing from EU membership, outlining the key legal and procedural steps involved. Chapter 4 analyzes the different options available for the UK after leaving the EU, including the EFTA/EEA, the Norwegian model, and the Swiss model. It examines the potential implications of each model for the UK's economy, politics, and legal system.
The key terms and concepts explored in this dissertation include EU supremacy, EEA relationship, EU member state, withdrawal, EFTA, and the Norwegian and Swiss models.
The dissertation investigates the UK's relationship with the EU, specifically examining the legal implications of EU supremacy, the withdrawal process under Article 50, and alternative models like the EEA or EFTA.
EU supremacy refers to the principle that EU law takes precedence over national law in Member States, which has significant implications for the UK's legal system.
Article 50 provides the formal legal procedure for a Member State to withdraw from the European Union.
These are alternative relationship models: Norway is part of the EEA with full market access, while Switzerland uses bilateral agreements to manage its relationship with the EU.
The paper assesses both arguments for and against withdrawal, focusing on market access, immigration issues, and the stability of the UK within the global financial economy.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

