Magisterarbeit, 2015
118 Seiten
This study aims to understand the role of different knowledge systems in the study of African sexuality, particularly focusing on the practice of female genital circumcision among the Sabiny people of Uganda. The study investigates how differing perspectives and knowledge systems impact the understanding of women’s health in the context of this practice.
Chapter 1 introduces the research problem, outlining the significance of the study and its objectives. It delves into the conceptual framework, methodology, and ethical considerations guiding the research. Chapter 2 provides a theoretical framework for understanding the politics of knowledge, examining different perspectives on African sexualities and exploring the various discourses surrounding female genital circumcision. Chapter 3 focuses on the Sabiny people and their cultural practice of female genital circumcision, examining its historical context and the implications for women’s health. The chapter discusses the impact of the practice on women's health, analyzing its potential risks and benefits.
The key themes and concepts explored in this dissertation include African sexualities, female genital circumcision, female genital mutilation, women's health, women's reproductive health, the politics of knowledge, cultural practices, and the Sabiny people of Uganda.
It refers to the power dynamics involved in deciding whose knowledge matters (Western vs. African) when discussing traditions like female genital circumcision.
The Sabiny practice it as "wonsetapkoruk" or "wosho," a rite of initiation that confers femininity and distinguishes girls from women.
The study argues that dominant discourses often marginalize actual health concerns, focusing instead on naming and standpoints, which affects the practical understanding of health.
Resistance often stems from the deep cultural values attached to the rite and the minimal communication between Western critics and local practitioners.
The study employs an African feminist approach to evaluate how the politics of knowledge affects the perception of women's reproductive health.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

