Masterarbeit, 2016
125 Seiten, Note: 1
1 Preface
1. 1 Structure of the Thesis
1. 2 Summary and Perspective
2 Theoretical Introduction
2. 1 A Discourse on High Potential
2. 1. 1 Potential
2. 1. 2 Leadership
2. 1. 3 High Potential – Low Potential
2. 1. 4 Innate or Acquired
2. 1. 5 Constancy
2. 2 Attributes
2. 2. 1 Personality
2. 2. 2 Emotional Intelligence
2. 2. 3 Upbringing
2. 2. 4 Political Activities
2. 2. 5 Social Network
2. 3 Additional Attributes
2. 3. 1 Authenticity and Type-Inadequate Behaviour
2. 3. 2 Intelligence
2. 3. 3 Power
2. 4 Typology
2. 4. 1 Personality Models
2. 4. 2 Typology - F. Riemann
2. 4. 3 Riemann Test
2. 5 Aims of the Study
2. 5. 1 Statement of the Problem
2. 5. 2 Research Question
2. 5. 3 Hypothesis
3 Methodology and Design
3. 1 Sample
3. 2 Measures
3. 2. 1 Online Tests
3. 2. 2 Online Questionnaire
3. 2. 3 Risk Mitigation
3. 3 Data Analysis
3. 3. 1 Aggregation of the Raw-Data
3. 3. 2 General Statistics
3. 3. 3 Data Analysis used for Hypothesis 1 – Personality Type
3. 3. 4 Data Analysis used for Hypothesis 2 - EQ
3. 3. 5 Data Analysis used for Hypothesis 3 - Environment
3. 3. 6 Data Analysis used for Hypothesis 4 - Attributes
3. 3. 7 Data Analysis used for Hypothesis 5 - Attribute Pattern
3. 3. 8 Data Analysis used for Hypothesis 6 - Early Detection
3. 3. 9 Data Analysis used for Hypothesis 7 - Income
4 Results
4. 1 General Statistics
4. 2 Results for Hypothesis 1 – Personality Type
4. 2. 1 Hypothesis 1 - Dominant Personality Type
4. 2. 2 Hypothesis 1 - Personality Type Pattern
4. 2. 3 Hypothesis 1 - Analysis
4. 3 Results for Hypothesis 2 - EQ
4. 3. 1 Hypothesis 2 - EQ Test Scores
4. 3. 2 Hypothesis 2 - EQ Components
4. 3. 3 Hypothesis 2 - Analysis
4. 4 Results for Hypothesis 3 - Environment
4. 4. 1 Hypothesis 3 - Birth Order
4. 4. 2 Hypothesis 3 - Family Structure
4. 4. 3 Hypothesis 3 - Family Wealth
4. 4. 4 Hypothesis 3 - Analysis
4. 5 Results for Hypothesis 4 - Attributes
4. 5. 1 Hypothesis 4 - Political Activity
4. 5. 2 Hypothesis 4 - Regard for the Social Network
4. 5. 3 Hypothesis 4 - Analysis
4. 6 Results for Hypothesis 5 – Attribute Pattern
4. 6. 1 Hypothesis 5 - Attribute Combination
4. 6. 2 Hypothesis 5 - Analysis
4. 7 Results for Hypothesis 6 – Early Detection
4. 7. 1 Hypothesis 6 - Early Detection
4. 7. 2 Hypothesis 6 - Analysis
4. 8 Results for Hypothesis 7 - Income
4. 8. 1 Hypothesis 7 - Average Income
4. 8. 2 Hypothesis 7 - Job Satisfaction
4. 8. 3 Hypothesis 7 - Average Income, Job Satisfaction and Personality Type
4. 8. 4 Hypothesis 7 - Analysis
5 Discussion and Conclusion
5. 1 Interpretation of Research Results
5. 1. 1 General Statistics
5. 1. 2 Attributes and Potential
5. 1. 3 Early Detection
5. 1. 4 Personality Type, Job Satisfaction and Income
5. 2 Conclusion
5. 3 Critical Reflection
5. 3. 1 Critical Reflection on the Personality Type
5. 3. 2 Critical Reflection on the Riemann Test
5. 3. 3 Critical Reflection on High-Potential
5. 3. 4 Critical Reflection on the Data Pool
5. 3. 5 Critical Reflection on the Constancy
5. 3. 6 Limitations of the Study
5. 4 Further Research
This thesis investigates the specific personality structures and emotional intelligence attributes that distinguish high-potential employees (HiPos) from those with lower potential (LoPos) in a business environment. By applying F. Riemann's personality typology and D. Goleman's emotional intelligence framework, the study seeks to identify common attribute patterns that contribute to an individual being selected for high-potential development programs.
2. 1. 1 Potential
First of all potential is needs to be defined. In “Praxishandbuch Managementdiagnostik” (Lackner, 2012) the “ladder of success” describes the central mechanic of the advancement from talent to success (own representation):
Potential is the second step in the ladder of success, based on talent and leading to competency. The prerequisites to advance to potential is a job related context.
The fundament is talent, which is to a certain degree given by the genes and consequently inherited from the parent’s genes, see chapter 2.1.4 Innate or Acquired. This fundament is the starting point and therefore determining the chance for success in a context that is requiring a respective talent. A talent, e.g. for creativity, will be useful for an artist. But for an accountant it may be contra productive and frustrating because the talent probably cannot be run free.
For a potential to develop, the corresponding talent needs to be present. The talent will be of no use, if the context does not require that specific talent. As a result the talent never advances to potential. E.g. a talented programmer will only be able to gain potential in a programming department. A person with no talent for logical and abstract thinking will not gain potential in programming skills, even in the programming department.
Competency derives from knowledge and experience of using the potential. It needs to be used in the proper context and enriched by training to develop competency in that environment. E.g. a potential junior executive requires training, mentoring and experience to gain competency and to be able to successfully lead a department.
1 Preface: Introduces the research context, the motivation behind examining HiPos, and the focus on personality and emotional intelligence as key success factors.
2 Theoretical Introduction: Defines core concepts like potential and success, details the Riemann personality typology, and establishes the theoretical framework for attributes like EQ, upbringing, and social networks.
3 Methodology and Design: Outlines the quantitative study design, participant sampling from various European companies, and the use of Riemann and EQ self-assessment tests.
4 Results: Presents the statistical data analysis, testing seven hypotheses regarding the correlations between personality, environment, early detection, and professional success.
5 Discussion and Conclusion: Critically evaluates the research findings, addresses limitations such as sample size and social desirability bias, and provides a final conclusion on the characteristic attribute patterns of high potentials.
High Potentials, Personality Structure, Emotional Intelligence, Riemann Typology, Career Success, Talent Management, Leadership Ability, Workplace Psychology, Professional Development, Attribute Pattern, Potential Assessment, Job Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, Early Detection, Social Network
The research investigates the differences in personality structure and emotional intelligence between high-potential employees (HiPos) and those with lower potential (LoPos) within a business context.
The study primarily utilizes the Riemann typology (based on fear structures) and references the Big Five model and Goleman’s emotional intelligence framework.
The study aims to determine which specific personality traits and emotional intelligence levels distinguish high-potential employees from their counterparts in an international corporate environment.
Data is collected via a voluntary online questionnaire including Riemann and EQ self-assessment tests, followed by statistical analysis using Chi-Square and t-tests to identify significant differences.
It refers to the specific combination of personality traits, EQ components, and background factors that appear statistically more prevalent in individuals identified as high-potentials.
Key terms include High Potentials, Riemann Typology, Emotional Intelligence, Career Success, and Attribute Pattern.
The study’s analysis of upbringing factors, including birth order, proved inconclusive, suggesting limited direct impact on being considered a high-potential in this sample.
The study found that while income is generally higher for HiPos, a higher income does not necessarily correlate with higher job satisfaction, suggesting a complex relationship between financial success and personal fulfillment.
The study notes that while 80% of HiPos report noticeable behaviors in childhood, the statistical significance for using this as a definitive early detection method remains inconclusive.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

