Masterarbeit, 2004
39 Seiten, Note: sehr gut
2. INTRODUCTION
3. COMPONENTS OF REGULATORY INTELLIGENCE
3.1 COMPETITOR INFORMATION
3.1.1 Criteria for the definition of relevant competitors
3.1.2 Essential information to be gathered about competitors
3.1.2.1 Trade name
3.1.2.2 International Non-proprietary Name (INN)
3.1.2.3 Drug class
3.1.2.4 Type of Procedure
3.1.2.5 Countries and the associated Submission date / Approval date
3.1.2.6 Clinical trials presented in the dossier
3.1.2.7 Competitor labelling
3.1.3 Sources of Competitor Information
3.1.3.1 Authority Homepages
3.1.3.2 Company Homepages
3.1.3.3 Scientific Publications
3.1.3.4 Scientific Internet Search Engines
3.1.3.5 General Internet Search Engines
3.1.3.6 Labelling Databases
3.2 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
3.2.1 Agency Benchmarks
3.2.1.1 FDA
3.2.1.2 EMEA
3.2.1.3 Germany
3.2.1.4 France
3.2.1.5 Conclusion
3.2.2 Regulatory Precedents on Other Products
3.2.3 Ongoing and Future Regulatory Changes
3.2.3.1 Review 2001 (Europe)
3.2.3.2 EU Enlargement
3.2.3.3 Implementation of the Clinical Trial directive (Directive 2001/20/EC)
3.2.3.4 Implementation of the CTD structure for Dossiers
3.2.4 Trade Associations
3.2.4.1 VFA
3.2.4.2 EFPIA
3.2.4.3 JPMA
3.2.4.4 PhRMA
3.2.4.5 IFPMA
3.2.5 Regulatory Associations
3.2.6 WHO
3.2.7 Training courses and Meetings
3.3 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
3.3.1 General Requirements
3.3.1.1 Supra-national Guidance - Example: ICH
3.3.1.2 Europe
3.3.1.3 Japan
3.3.1.4 USA
3.3.1 Therapeutic Area Guidance – Example: Microbial Diseases
3.3.2 Special Populations – Example: Paediatric Patients
3.3.3 Orphan Drug Designation
4. REGULATORY STRATEGY
4.1 DEFINITION OF “GLOBAL REGULATORY STRATEGY”
4.2 REGULATORY AFFAIRS STRATEGIC CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GLOBAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
4.2.1 Competitor Analysis and Target Labelling
4.2.2 Definition of Trade Name and INN
4.2.3 Definition of Key Markets
4.2.4 Definition of a Clinical Development Plan
4.2.5 Identification and Validation of Relevant Guidelines
4.2.6 Life Cycle Management Strategy
4.3 REGULATORY STRATEGY AND IMPACT ON OTHER DISCIPLINES
4.3.1 Submission Strategy
4.3.2 Strategy for Meetings with Health Authorities
4.3.3 Issue Management
5. DISCUSSION
This work examines the pivotal role of regulatory intelligence as a fundamental prerequisite for developing effective regulatory strategies throughout the drug development lifecycle until submission. The central research focus is to demonstrate how systematic intelligence gathering—concerning competitors, regulatory environments, and legal requirements—enables regulatory affairs managers to optimize drug development plans and navigate the complex "rules of the game" to maximize return on investment.
3.1.2.1 Trade name
Trade names can be different in different regions and countries. The assignment of a trade name depends on cultural and linguistic habits. In addition to this, trade names need to be distinguishable from similar trade names in the country in order to avoid confusion in the pharmacies. Therefore, it is essential to have an overview on existing trade names in the target region / country. If a company aims for one global trade name this name needs to be acceptable to all target countries with their national languages. If the name sounds acceptable for English speaking countries it may have an unacceptable meaning in other languages. An example is the Mitsubishi car “Pajero” which is acceptable in English but means a strong insult in Spanish. So, the overview on already existing trade names is a basis to think about potential own trade names.
2. INTRODUCTION: Explains regulatory intelligence as a necessary prerequisite for drug development strategy, excluding post-approval life cycle management and generic drugs.
3. COMPONENTS OF REGULATORY INTELLIGENCE: Details the primary pillars of intelligence gathering, specifically competitor information, analysis of the regulatory environment, and understanding legal requirements.
4. REGULATORY STRATEGY: Defines the concept of global regulatory strategy and outlines how regulatory affairs strategically contributes to multidisciplinary development plans, including submission tactics and issue management.
5. DISCUSSION: Evaluates the shift of regulatory affairs from a cost-intensive "post office" function to a key strategic discipline that directly influences the success of drug development and company financial outcomes.
Regulatory Intelligence, Regulatory Strategy, Drug Development, Competitor Analysis, Health Authorities, FDA, EMEA, Marketing Authorization, Clinical Development Plan, Common Technical Document, Orphan Drugs, Paediatric Patients, Submission Strategy, ICH, Pharmacovigilance.
The paper focuses on "Regulatory Intelligence" and its critical function as a foundation for building a successful regulatory strategy in the pharmaceutical industry, specifically during the drug development process up to the submission of a new drug candidate.
The work revolves around three major components: gathering detailed competitor information, monitoring the global regulatory environment, and adhering to diverse international legal requirements.
The goal is to ensure a smooth, efficient transition of drug candidates into marketed products while optimizing the return on investment through "claims-driven" research and development and informed strategic decisions.
The paper emphasizes a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach, utilizing intelligence gathering from regulatory databases, agency benchmarks, scientific literature, and strategic interactions with health authorities.
It covers the contributions of regulatory affairs to the global multidisciplinary development plan, including target labelling, trade name selection, clinical development plan design, and the management of regulatory submissions and health authority meetings.
Key terms include Regulatory Intelligence, Regulatory Strategy, Drug Development, Competitor Analysis, Health Authorities (FDA/EMEA), and Global Submission strategies.
The author argues against the traditional perception of regulatory affairs as merely a cost-intensive administrative "post office," positioning it instead as an essential, high-value discipline that supports successful drug approvals.
Competitor analysis is vital because it provides insights into successful development patterns, potential authority hurdles, and market positioning, which helps companies avoid costly mistakes and refine their own development trajectories.
The document stresses the need for continuous monitoring of dynamic regulatory changes (like EU enlargement and the Clinical Trial Directive) to ensure that development dossiers remain compliant at the time of future submission.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

