Masterarbeit, 2016
76 Seiten, Note: 1,0
1 Introduction
1.1 Motivation and Problem Definition
1.2 Research Objectives and Contributions
1.3 Course of Investigation
2 The Concept of Private Equity
2.1 Asset Class – Private Equity
2.2 Private Equity Backed IPOs
3 Literature Review
3.1 Value Creation of Private Equity Firms
3.2 Characteristics of Private Equity Backed IPOs
3.3 Performance of Private Equity Backed IPOs
4 First Empirical Research
4.1 Study Objectives
4.2 Research Questions and Hypotheses
4.3 Relevance and Contributions
4.4 Research Methods
4.5 Identification of Private Equity Backed IPOs
4.6 Data Sample
4.7 Limitations
4.8 Descriptive Statistics
4.8.1 Distribution by Market Value, and Timing of IPO
4.8.2 Distribution by Industry Sector
4.9 Sample Analyses
4.9.1 Unadjusted Buy-and-Hold Returns
4.9.2 Buy-and-Hold Abnormal Returns
4.9.3 Cumulative Abnormal Returns
4.9.4 Wealth Relative
4.10 Summary and Conclusion of Findings
5 Second Empirical Research
5.1 Study Objectives
5.2 Research Questions and Hypotheses
5.3 Sourcing of Data Sample
5.4 Limitations
5.5 Descriptive Statistics
5.5.1 Distribution by Offer Size
5.5.2 Distribution by Country
5.5.3 Distribution by Industry Sector
5.5.4 Distribution by Time Period
5.6 Research Methods
5.7 Sample Analyses
5.7.1 Unadjusted Buy-and-Hold Returns
5.7.2 Buy-and-Hold Abnormal Returns
5.7.3 Cumulative Abnormal Returns
5.7.4 Wealth Relative
5.8 Summary and Conclusion of Findings
6 Summary and Conclusion
6.1 Key Take-Aways
6.2 Further Research
This study aims to determine whether private equity firms create value in a sustainable way by comparing the long-term stock performance of private equity backed IPOs with non-private equity backed IPOs, focusing on both the UK and the broader European market.
1.1 Motivation and Problem Definition
This study aims to provide evidence about the sustainability of value creation within private equity investments. Private equity firms have been often criticised for their methods (Baker, Filbeck, & Kiymaz, 2015). Researchers on the topic often argue that private equity firms have a negative impact on the society as they increase the systematic risk of the banking system due to highly leveraged deals as well as the squeeze out of their portfolio companies, which inevitably leaves their stakeholders empty handed (Burg & Rasmuss, 2007). Regardless of their individual arguments, the main statement of these criticism can be summarised in one sentence ‘the activities of private equity firms rather destroy value as they creating it’ (The Economist, 2007). Such criticism undoubtedly has a detrimental impact on the acquired companies of the private equity firms. In several European countries, there is an ongoing discussion concerning the impact of private equity firms (Strömberg, 2009). Some authors accuse financial investors for focusing their activities in a portfolio company only to obtain short-term returns rather than creating long-term value, which would be more beneficial as it would help all stakeholders. In addition, authors making such criticism only look at the short holding periods, which would also hurt the company rather than help them. Moreover, the critics also consider the high leverage as having a negative impact (Burg & Rasmuss, 2007). They claim that companies have to take on a high burden because they have to service their high debt obligations. Upon exit of any investment, these companies are inevitably forced to use their cash flows for debt repayment rather than investing it in their productivity.
1 Introduction: Defines the scientific problem of sustainable value creation in private equity and outlines the study's research objectives.
2 The Concept of Private Equity: Explains the private equity business model, the role of general and limited partners, and the specific nature of private equity backed IPOs.
3 Literature Review: Reviews existing research on value creation drivers and the historical performance of private equity backed IPOs.
4 First Empirical Research: Conducts a quantitative analysis of UK-based IPOs using various return metrics to test performance hypotheses.
5 Second Empirical Research: Extends the investigation to the European market to validate findings on a larger, regional sample size.
6 Summary and Conclusion: Consolidates all empirical findings and provides key takeaways regarding the sustainability of private equity value creation.
Private Equity, Initial Public Offering, IPO, Value Creation, Buy-and-Hold Abnormal Return, BHAR, Cumulative Abnormal Return, CAR, Wealth Relative, WR, Leveraged Buyout, LBO, Stock Performance, Sustainable Value, Financial Sponsor.
The research aims to determine whether private equity firms create sustainable value by investigating if private equity backed companies outperform non-private equity backed peers in the long term.
The study performs two separate empirical analyses: one focusing on the UK private equity market and another on the broader European market.
The study employs quantitative analysis of secondary stock price data, utilizing metrics such as Buy-and-Hold Abnormal Returns (BHAR), Cumulative Abnormal Returns (CAR), and Wealth Relative (WR).
Generally, the study indicates that while some private equity backed firms perform well, the majority do not significantly outperform market benchmarks in the long run.
Key themes include the impact of leverage, the importance of reputation, the influence of IPO timing, and the differences between various industry sectors.
The study concludes that private equity firms do not generate sustainable value, despite achieving high returns for some individual companies due to specific market conditions.
A two-step approach was used: scanning IPO prospectuses to identify private equity involvement and cross-checking data via the Bloomberg terminal.
Yes, the study notes that periods such as the dotcom crisis and the financial crisis of 2007-2009 significantly influenced IPO activity and performance outcomes.
Researchers use both methods because they provide different attributes; BHAR reflects the long-term investor perspective, while CAR helps visualize distributional properties over time.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

