Bachelorarbeit, 2016
31 Seiten, Note: 1,7
1. Introduction – Divided Views on Globalization
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1 Modern or Dependent?
2.2 Findings and Causal Mechanisms in Previous Literature
3. What is Globalization? – Finding a Definition
3.1 Explaining Poverty and Inequality
4. The Research Design
4.1 Introduction and Description of Applied Variables
4.2 Correlation Analyses
5. Limitations and Concluding Thoughts
6. Publication Bibliography
7. Appendix
This paper aims to examine the debate surrounding globalization by empirically analyzing its relationship with world poverty and income inequality through a cross-sectional analysis using the KOF Index of Globalization. The study seeks to determine whether globalization exacerbates or alleviates poverty and inequality, evaluating competing theories such as modernization theory against dependency theory.
1. Introduction – Divided Views on Globalization
The world’s 85 richest people possess more financial wealth than the world’s 3.5 billion poorest; evidently, inequality presents “one of the biggest economic, social, and political challenges of our time” (Seery/Arendat 2014, p. 7). Poverty is inextricably linked to the issue of inequality and therefore must be analyzed in the same context (Edelman, 2013). Countries with high levels of inequality most likely have high levels of poverty, and the inverse corresponds (EAPN Social Inclusion Work Group 2009). Poverty limits equality of opportunities for education, health, and standards of living, dividing society into the “haves” and the “have-nots.” Whether in scholarly research and academic literature or the current political climate, critics point to rapid globalization as the source. Presently, the controversy of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) between the European Union and the United States could not be of higher contentious debate; but the arguments made thereof may be only a fragment of an even bigger dispute: what degree of global integration is best and what are its potential consequences?
Moreover, how truly beneficial is globalization over-all? Supporters argue it enhances economic growth and diminishes poverty. Critics believe it contributes to added wealth for the rich and increasing poverty for the poor, and consequently, the loss of the middle class and widening of the social gap. Both sides back their arguments with ‘facts’ and studies, confidently proposing their views: […] the confidence with which officials of international financial institutions and opinion-makers in influential newspapers and magazines assert their belief in the value of global free markets in expanding the horizons for the poor is only matched by the passionate intensity with which activist protesters hold their opposite belief. (Bardhan 2005, pp. 1–2)
1. Introduction – Divided Views on Globalization: This chapter introduces the conflicting perspectives on globalization's impact on poverty and inequality and outlines the research objective to empirically test these claims.
2. Theoretical Framework: This section reviews modernization and dependency theories to provide a theoretical basis for understanding the polarized debate on global economic integration.
3. What is Globalization? – Finding a Definition: This chapter discusses the complexity of defining globalization and establishes a multidimensional definition covering economic, political, and social facets.
4. The Research Design: This section details the methodology, including the use of the KOF Index, World Bank data, and GINI coefficients to perform a cross-sectional correlation analysis.
5. Limitations and Concluding Thoughts: This chapter summarizes the empirical findings, acknowledges methodological limitations, and suggests directions for future research regarding causal mechanisms.
6. Publication Bibliography: A comprehensive list of academic sources and datasets utilized in the study.
7. Appendix: This section provides the raw data table for the countries analyzed, including their KOF, GINI, poverty, HDI, and GDP values.
Globalization, Poverty, Income Inequality, Modernization Theory, Dependency Theory, KOF Index, Economic Growth, Cross-Sectional Analysis, World Bank, GINI Index, Trade Integration, Absolute Poverty, Relative Poverty, OECD, Human Development Index.
The research focuses on empirically testing the controversial effects of globalization on income inequality and poverty levels across different nations.
The work covers theoretical development, the definition of globalization as a multidimensional concept, research design using global indices, and the statistical correlation between global integration and social welfare metrics.
The central question is whether a higher degree of globalization relates to increased or decreased levels of poverty and inequality within countries.
The study utilizes a quantitative, cross-sectional analysis, calculating Pearson correlations between KOF Globalization Index scores and various indicators like GINI coefficients and poverty headcount ratios.
The main body discusses the theoretical contrast between modernization and dependency theories, defines globalization, outlines the selection of variables, and presents correlation analyses for both OECD and non-OECD country groupings.
The paper is characterized by terms such as globalization, poverty, income inequality, KOF Index, modernization theory, and cross-sectional analysis.
The author defines globalization in a broad sense as a process that connects economies, governments, and social networks on a world scale and intensifies their interactions and global integration.
The KOF Index was selected because it is multidimensional, covering economic, social, and political aspects of globalization, rather than focusing solely on economic variables.
The analysis suggests a negative relationship between globalization and poverty/inequality, implying that more globalized countries tend to have lower levels of both poverty and income inequality.
The study performs a comparative analysis by splitting the sample into OECD (higher developed) and non-OECD countries to determine if the effects of globalization vary by development status.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

