Masterarbeit, 2018
65 Seiten, Note: A
This thesis aims to explore the relationship between biological advancements and the concept of human rights, focusing on the growing skepticism towards human rights within the scientific community. The thesis argues that advancements in applied sciences, such as stem cell research, robotics, and artificial intelligence, challenge traditional human rights frameworks.
Chapter 1 introduces the thesis, setting the stage for exploring the relationship between biological advancements and human rights skepticism. Chapter 2 delves into the skepticism towards human rights arising from the applied sciences, examining specific cases like stem cell research and artificial intelligence. Chapter 3 explores the skepticism about human rights from the perspective of social sciences, focusing on the failure of the social contract and the philosophical underpinnings of human rights.
This thesis focuses on the complex interplay between human rights and biological advancements, exploring key concepts such as human rights skepticism, bioethics, stem cell research, artificial intelligence, social contract, and international human rights declarations. The work delves into the challenges posed by scientific advancements to traditional human rights frameworks and seeks to identify pathways for collaborative engagement between social and applied scientists.
Scientists in applied sciences often find legal human rights frameworks restrictive and alien to scientific culture, especially regarding innovative research.
The ethical and biological nature of embryonic stem cell research often conflicts with normative theories and UN declarations drafted by social scientists.
Yes, advancements in AI and robotics raise new questions about legal personhood and ethics that traditional human rights regimes struggle to address.
The thesis argues that empirical evidence from applied sciences should not be restricted by the philosophical and normative theories often found in UN documents.
The thesis explores the failure of the social contract from a social science perspective, questioning its local normative validity in the modern scientific community.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

