Bachelorarbeit, 2018
55 Seiten, Note: 1,3
1. Introduction
Chapter 2: The Conceptual Framework and Literature Review
2.1 Concepts
2.1.1 National Interest
2.1.2 Spheres of Influence
2.1.3. Geopolitics
2.1.4. Conflict Stalemate
2.1.5. Conflict Management
2.1.6. Conflict Resolution
2.2. Literature Review
2.2.1. The Yugoslav War(s)
2.2.2. The Transnistria Conflict
2.2.3. The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict
Chapter 3: The Theoretical Framework and Conflict Background
3.1. Theories
3.2. Background of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict
3.2.1. Armenian-Azerbaijani Relations
3.2.2. Armenian-Russian Relations
3.2.3. Azerbaijani-Russian Relations
Chapter 4: The Analysis of the Russian Incentives
4.1. The Geopolitical Importance of the Caucasus for Russia
4.2. The Geopolitical Importance of the South Caucasian States
4.3. Channels of Russian Influence in the South Caucasus
4.4. Russian Economic Benefits from Maintaining the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict
4.4.1. Russian Arms Selling Business
4.4.2. Russian Geo-energy Benefits
4.5. Security Dimension of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict
Conclusion
List of References
This thesis investigates the underlying reasons for the Russian Federation's interest in preserving the status quo regarding the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, utilizing international relations theories to analyze how this stalemate benefits Russian geopolitical, economic, and security interests.
2.1.4. Conflict Stalemate
Conflict stalemate occur for four major reasons: the failure of contentious tactics, exhaustion of necessary resources, loss of social support and unacceptable costs. Conflicting parties cannot or are not willing to escalate the conflict, however this is not a guarantee that the involved parties are aiming at actions which will later result in an agreement. Even in the situation of a conflict stalemate, parties may develop tactics in order to prevail over the other party through different means. In theory, if both parties come to the conclusion that the conflict is intolerable, the risk and costs are too high or unacceptable and that the continuation of the conflict is more harmful than its solution, then, this situation may serve as the basis for conflict reduction or conflict resolution (Rubin et al. 1994: 151-152).
Furthermore, Brahm (2003) contributes for the concept, as he writes, that if the involved actors have political and/or economic incentives of prolonging the conflict, logically they will not work in favour of resolution. Another issue towards the settlement of a given conflict, which may arise, is that leaders may fear loss of confidence in their abilities if they work for a resolution, because it may result in the perception that persuading the conflict in general was a mistake. Moreover, long-lasting conflicts are characterised with a hostile socialization of the parties towards each other, which results in unwillingness to accept other side`s demands.
Another important aspect of conflict stalemate is identified by Zartman (2001). As he writes, conflicting parties may find themselves in a situation of a Mutually Hurting Stalemate (MHS), which is based on the notion, “[…] that when the parties find themselves locked in a conflict from which they cannot escalate to victory and this deadlock is painful to both of them (although not necessarily in equal degree or for the same reasons), they seek an alternative policy or Way Out.” (Zartman 2001: 8).
1. Introduction: This chapter defines the scope of the thesis, which is to analyze the role of Russia in maintaining the Nagorno-Karabakh status quo, and identifies the research gap in using international relations theories to study this influence.
Chapter 2: The Conceptual Framework and Literature Review: The chapter clarifies essential concepts such as national interest, spheres of influence, and conflict stalemate, and reviews existing literature on the Yugoslav, Transnistria, and Nagorno-Karabakh conflicts.
Chapter 3: The Theoretical Framework and Conflict Background: This section establishes realism as the primary theoretical lens for the analysis and provides a historical and relational overview of the parties involved in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.
Chapter 4: The Analysis of the Russian Incentives: This chapter analyzes Russia's geopolitical, economic, and security-related motivations for maintaining the conflict in the South Caucasus, including arms sales and energy transit control.
Conclusion: The conclusion summarizes findings, asserting that preserving the stalemate serves Russia's national interests by reinforcing its role as a regional hegemon and preventing the influence of other global powers.
Nagorno-Karabakh, Russian Federation, Realism, Geopolitics, Sphere of Influence, Conflict Stalemate, South Caucasus, International Relations, Energy Security, Arms Trade, Foreign Policy, Status Quo, Regional Hegemon, Security Interests, Post-Soviet Space.
The work examines why the Russian Federation is motivated to maintain the current Nagorno-Karabakh conflict stalemate rather than pursuing a comprehensive resolution.
The thesis employs the realist school of international relations, focusing on power, security, and national interests to explain state behavior.
The core question is: why is Russia interested in maintaining the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict?
The study uses a state-level analysis, deriving assumptions from international relations theories to interpret Russian behavior from the early 2000s to the present.
The author argues that it is not a "frozen conflict" but rather a situation of a "mutually hurting stalemate" that is actively maintained to serve the strategic interests of external actors, primarily Russia.
These concepts are central to the analysis, as Russia views the South Caucasus as part of its "near abroad" and uses its position to counteract Western influence and secure its regional interests.
Russia acts as the primary arms supplier to both Armenia and Azerbaijan, using the resulting armament spiral to increase its economic benefits and maintain leverage over both states.
By controlling influence in the region, Russia prevents alternative energy pipelines from bypassing its territory, thereby protecting its position as the dominant energy supplier to Europe.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

