Bachelorarbeit, 2017
46 Seiten, Note: 1,0
This work examines the impact of social distance and communication on subjects' behavior in ultimatum games. By reviewing existing research and comparing findings, the study aims to understand how variations in social distance and communication influence decision-making in these games.
Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the topic, highlighting the relevance of social distance and communication in economic experiments. Chapter 2 presents a theoretical foundation, explaining the Ultimatum Game and its core concepts, including the strategy method. Chapter 3 explores various studies on ultimatum games, summarizing findings from decades of research and contrasting these with the concept of material opportunism. This chapter also delves into subjects' reasoning and motivations in the game. Chapter 4 specifically examines the impact of social distance on behavior in ultimatum games, defining the term and exploring how it can be manipulated in experimental settings. This chapter also investigates the link between social distance and subjects' behavior in the game. Chapter 5 focuses on the role of communication, defining the term and exploring how it influences social distance. The chapter then investigates communication in the context of ultimatum games, considering different types of communication and its impact on subject behavior.
The main keywords and focus topics of this work include ultimatum game, social distance, communication, anonymity, subject behavior, decision-making, experimental economics, realism, and methodological issues. The study examines the interplay of these concepts to understand the impact of social factors on economic decision-making in a controlled laboratory setting.
It is an economic experiment where one player (proposer) offers a split of a sum of money to another (responder). If the responder rejects, neither player gets anything.
Decreased social distance (less anonymity) usually leads to higher offers from proposers and a lower rejection threshold from responders.
Communication often increases the offers made by proposers. Game-related discussions can lead responders to increase their acceptance thresholds.
Rational choice theory suggests responders should accept any amount > 0, but in reality, they reject low offers due to motives like fairness, reciprocity, or spite.
It is a procedure where responders specify their reaction to every possible offer before knowing the actual offer made by the proposer.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

