Masterarbeit, 2019
209 Seiten
The goal of this paper is to investigate the structural differences between Germany and leading countries that are responsible for the slower implementation of BIM in Germany. It will examine how these favorable structures can be transferred to Germany. The work starts with a presentation of the fundamentals of BIM and its potential for the construction industry value chain. After outlining the lead of the UK, USA, and Finland over Germany, a case study methodology is developed to compare these countries. To create a basis for comparison, all relevant structures that can influence the spread of BIM are identified through a comprehensive literature review. Subsequently, Germany is compared to the UK, USA, and Finland based on these structures. The evaluation of this comparison reveals five significant structural deficits in Germany, for which measures are recommended.
The paper begins with an introduction to BIM and its principles, highlighting the importance of digitalization and its impact on productivity and quality. It then delves into the BIM project lifecycle, outlining the key stages from preliminary planning to operation. The chapter also examines structural barriers to BIM implementation, emphasizing the fragmentation of the construction industry value chain. The paper then establishes a research basis by exploring the significance of BIM in the construction industry and analyzing existing literature. The methodology of the work is presented next, detailing the research question development, examination of background aspects, analysis of cases, and evaluation of results. Chapter 5 examines the structural barriers to BIM implementation, specifically focusing on market conditions, market participants' characteristics, project delivery with BIM, and the role of institutions. This chapter explores factors such as economic activity requirements, market conditions in the AEC industry, stakeholder dependencies, innovativeness of market participants, BIM investment return, and the impact of BIM standards and contracts. Lastly, chapter 6 compares the cases of Germany, UK, USA, and Finland, analyzing their respective market conditions, market participants' characteristics, project delivery with BIM, and the role of institutions in BIM development. The paper concludes by identifying key structural deficits in Germany and proposing recommendations for improving BIM implementation.
The primary focus of the paper is the implementation of BIM in the construction industry, with particular emphasis on the structural differences between Germany and leading countries. The work examines the influence of market conditions, stakeholder dependencies, innovativeness of market participants, BIM investment return, BIM standards, contracts, and the role of institutions in driving BIM adoption. It further explores the impact of digitalization on productivity and quality within the construction industry. Key concepts include Building Information Modeling (BIM), value chain, fragmentation, case study methodology, structural deficits, economic activity, AEC industry, innovativeness, investment feasibility, BIM standards, contracts, and institutional roles.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!
Kommentare