Masterarbeit, 2015
57 Seiten, Note: 8,0
This paper investigates the effect of the European public audit oversight reform on audit quality, specifically focusing on the impact of the reform on earnings management practices. It aims to determine whether Directive 2006/43/EC has led to increased audit quality, measured through the level of abnormal accruals. Additionally, the paper examines the effectiveness of the two main public oversight models employed in the EU: full-time inspection and peer review with an independent commission monitoring. It explores whether one model is superior in reducing discretionary accruals and subsequently, enhancing audit quality.
The key terms and concepts explored in this paper include: quality of accruals, earnings quality, audit quality, public audit oversight, earnings management, discretionary accruals, full-time inspection, peer review, and regulatory environment.
The reform, initiated by Directive 2006/43/EC, aimed to regain investor confidence after major accounting scandals by establishing public oversight systems for statutory auditors across EU Member States.
Audit quality is measured by analyzing earnings management practices, specifically through the level of discretionary accruals and abnormal working capital accruals using the modified Jones model.
Member States can choose between the full-time inspection model (independent government bodies) and a modified peer review model monitored by an independent commission.
Empirical evidence suggests that managers were less likely to commit earnings management in the years following the reform, indicating an overall improvement in audit quality.
The study results were contradicting and did not support a firm conclusion on whether the full-time inspection model is superior to the modified peer review model in reducing discretionary accruals.
The EU followed the American example, specifically the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which established independent oversight for auditors in the United States.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

