Masterarbeit, 2019
71 Seiten, Note: 2,0
1 INTRODUCTION
2 BLOCKCHAIN AS ICT
2.1 BACKGROUND: FROM THE FIFTH TECHNO-ECONOMIC PARADIGM TO BITCOIN
2.2 TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF BLOCKCHAIN
2.3 BLOCKCHAIN APPLICATION TYPES
3 BLOCKCHAIN AS INSTITUTIONAL TECHNOLOGY
3.1 BACKGROUND: NEW INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS AND GOVERNANCE
3.2 CRYPTOECONOMICS AND BLOCKCHAIN GOVERNANCE
4 ANALYSES
4.1 USE CASES OF BLOCKCHAIN ON A MACRO LEVEL
4.2 ROLE OF BLOCKCHAIN IN ECONOMY AND SOCIETY
4.3 IMPACT OF BLOCKCHAIN FROM AN INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE
4.4 ANALYSIS OF INTERMEDIARIES IN THE BLOCKCHAIN ECOSYSTEM
4.5 CHALLENGES AND RISKS
5 CONCLUSION
This thesis explores and analyzes the technical and economic factors that determine the potential of blockchain technology for economy and society. The central research objective is to investigate blockchain both as a form of information and communication technology (ICT) and as an institutional technology, addressing its ability to act as an alternative governance system to reduce transaction costs and mitigate intermediary-driven inefficiencies.
Institutions as a governance structure
Within institutions, governance is the superordinate concept for designing conditions for ordered rule and collective action (Stoker, 1998, p.18). It is “drawn from but also beyond government” (ibid.) because it refers to any institution. Williamson is one of the pioneer thinkers of applying the theory of governance to the firm. From an organizational point of view, Williamson describes it as “an exercise in assessing the efficacy of alternative modes (means) of organization. The object is to effect good order through the mechanism of governance. A governance structure is thus usefully thought of as an institutional framework in which the integrity of a transaction, or related set of transactions, is decided.” (Williamson, 1996, p.4). “More generally, the study of governance is concerned with the identification, explication, and mitigation of all forms of contractual hazards.” (Williamson, 1996, p.5).
Importantly, governance differs from regulation. Governance is the “[…] rule-making by the owners or participants of a system with the purpose of safeguarding their private interests […]” (Walport et Al., 2016, p.41), whereas regulation is the “[…] rule-making by an outside authority tasked with representing the interests of the public.” (ibid.p.41). Another comparison is that regulation is about laws designed to control behavior and governance is about “stewardship, collaboration, and incentives to act on common interests.” (Tapscott & Tapscott, 2016). The Internet illustrates this differentiation. ‘Stewardship and collaboration’ are represented by institutions that form specialized networks around their competence.
1 INTRODUCTION: Outlines the disruptive potential of blockchain technology and establishes the research questions regarding its ICT and institutional perspectives.
2 BLOCKCHAIN AS ICT: Examines the foundational technical aspects of blockchain, including its historical emergence, base technologies, and current application categories.
3 BLOCKCHAIN AS INSTITUTIONAL TECHNOLOGY: Analyzes blockchain through the lens of New Institutional Economics, defining it as a rule-based system for governance and coordination.
4 ANALYSES: Compares blockchain with traditional databases, evaluates its role in the current economy, and identifies emerging intermediaries and challenges within the ecosystem.
5 CONCLUSION: Consolidates the research findings, answers the central research questions, and provides an outlook on the future integration of blockchain technology.
blockchain technology, blockchain applications, blockchain governance, transaction costs, Techno-economic paradigm, intermediaries, decentralized autonomous organization, new institutional economics, consensus algorithms, smart contracts, digital ledger technology, scalability, regulation, trust, cryptocurrency
The thesis explores the dual nature of blockchain technology: as an information technology (ICT) providing a technical framework for decentralized data processing, and as an institutional technology that acts as an alternative governance system to facilitate economic interaction.
The research covers the technical foundations of blockchain (distributed ledgers, cryptography, consensus), its economic implications (transaction cost theory, governance mechanisms), and its practical application within existing economic and social structures.
The study aims to determine the technical and economic factors that constitute the disruptive potential of blockchain technology for the economy and society, while specifically analyzing its efficiency as an alternative institutional framework compared to traditional intermediaries.
The research relies on three primary methods: an extensive review of academic and industry literature (e.g., Tapscott, Williamson, Antonopoulos), Internet-based research, and professional expert opinion from the blockchain industry.
The main body investigates the historical development of blockchain, its technical design as a database alternative, its governance models (on-chain vs. off-chain), and its impact on transaction costs, coordination, and the emerging role of new intermediaries.
The work is characterized by terms such as blockchain technology, transaction costs, institutional technology, decentralized governance, Techno-economic paradigm, and intermediaries.
According to the thesis, traditional databases are politically centralized under an administrator who controls access and data manipulation, whereas blockchain is typically a peer-to-peer network where consensus mechanisms ensure that transactions are immutable, irreversible, and verifiable without a central authority.
While blockchain ideology favors "disintermediation," the thesis identifies that new intermediaries emerge within the ecosystem—such as crypto-exchanges, core developers, and multisignature smart contracts—which provide necessary services but also introduce new points of failure and power concentration.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

