Magisterarbeit, 2006
135 Seiten, Note: 1,1
1 Introduction
1.1 Objective and Research Questions
1.1.1 Project Goal
1.2 Structure of this Work
2 Linguistics Background
2.1 Human Computer Interaction
2.2 Natural Language Processing
2.3 Dialog and Discourse
2.3.1 Dialog as Discourse
2.3.2 Dialog as a Teleological Activity
2.3.3 Dialog as a Collaborative/Cooperative Activity
2.3.4 Speech Utterances in a Dialog
2.4 Dialog Systems
2.4.1 Evolution
2.4.2 Field of Application
2.4.3 Architecture and Components
2.4.4 Dialog Management and Important Strategies
2.4.5 Design Criteria
2.5 Metadata and Knowledge Representation
3 Semantic Web, SmartWeb, and Ontologies
3.1 Semantic Web
3.2 SmartWeb
3.3 Semantic Similarity Measures
3.4 Ontology
3.4.1 General
3.4.2 Ontologies as a Base of Modeling
3.4.3 Ontologies for Communication
3.4.4 Ontologies as Conceptual Models
3.4.5 Important Aspects/Advantages
3.4.6 RDF and RDFS
3.4.7 Ontology-Languages
3.4.8 Challenges
4 State of the Art of Answer Selection
4.1 Question Answering
4.2 Answer Selection
5 Underlying Algorithms and Corpora
5.1 OntoScore
5.1.1 OntoScore Algorithm
5.2 AnswerScore
5.3 Agents and WrapperAgents
5.4 Jena
5.4.1 Jena API
5.5 Used Ontology Technology
5.5.1 EMMA
5.5.2 DOLCE
5.5.3 SUMO
5.5.4 Sport Event
5.5.5 SWIntO
6 Evaluating Semantic Relatedness for Answer Selection
6.1 OntoScore Study
6.1.1 OntoScore Analysis Part1
6.1.2 Evaluation Score
6.1.3 OntoScore Analysis Part 2
6.2 Conclusion
7 Semantic Density Approach
7.1 ProperScore
7.1.1 General Idea
7.1.2 ProperScore Algorithm
7.2 Implementation
7.3 Results
8 Conclusion
8.1 Conclusion
A Appendix A
A.1 First Data Set
A.1.1 Question Number One
A.1.2 Answer Number One
A.2 Second Data Set
A.2.1 Question Number One
A.2.2 Answer Number One
B Appendix B
B.1 Protégé Screenshots
B.1.1 Sport Event
B.1.2 SWIntO
C Appendix C
C.1 Table of Contents of the CD-ROM
This thesis focuses on developing, implementing, and evaluating an ontology-based answer selection algorithm for dialog systems. The primary research goal is to improve the 'semantic coherence' calculation and ranking of semantically represented queries and answers to increase user satisfaction and system reliability.
3.4.1 General
In the 17th century, approximately 1613, scientists are engaged in “ontology” as a theory or study of beings, respectively in answering the question, what actually exists and what does not. Thereby, one differentiated formal and material ontologies, whereas formal ontologies concentrate on describing structures and physical laws and material ontologies concern theirselves with categorization of the contents of being.
With Immanuel Kant’s “Critique of pure reason” [Lausser [32]] approaches of ontologies were regarded as critical and they were avoided for any length of time, in accordance to Lausser [32]. Only by the later dissociation of the branch of metaphysics ontologies revived interest in research again. Until now the term ontology is defined as “study of being, determining of order, terms and existence of being” (referring to Duden [48]). Thereby ontology explains the conception of the world and epistemology the conception of our experience of the world.
With language and script human have a sophisticated communication medium that enables a description of the real world. As an explicit specification of this world of terms ontologies in computer science are used more like the generally thought of material ontology originated in philosophy and partially the concepts are heavily changed.
In order to answer the question, what an ontology is adequately, it is necessary to look at its field of applications. In general, however, ontologies are explicit conceptual formalizations of an application area. They suit best the purpose of knowledge representation of interpersonal communication, but above all of computer-based knowledge processing.
Introduction: Provides the foundation and motivation for ontology-based answer selection in dialog systems, outlining the core research questions.
Linguistics Background: Establishes essential concepts regarding human-computer interaction, natural language processing, and the nuances of dialog and discourse.
Semantic Web, SmartWeb, and Ontologies: Explores the technical underpinnings, including the Semantic Web vision, RDF/RDFS structures, and the role of ontologies in modeling knowledge.
State of the Art of Answer Selection: Reviews existing techniques for question answering, highlighting the transition from document retrieval to candidate selection.
Underlying Algorithms and Corpora: Details the algorithmic base (OntoScore, AnswerScore), tools (Jena), and technologies (EMMA, DOLCE, SUMO, SWIntO) utilized in the SmartWeb project.
Evaluating Semantic Relatedness for Answer Selection: Presents an evaluation study of the OntoScore algorithm, identifying limitations in its effectiveness for selecting answers.
Semantic Density Approach: Introduces the new 'ProperScore' algorithm, which incorporates property slot-filling and instance-based scoring to improve answer candidate ranking.
Conclusion: Summarizes the findings and evaluates the performance of the proposed methods compared to baseline implementations.
Answer Selection, Dialog Systems, Semantic Web, Ontologies, OntoScore, ProperScore, Semantic Coherence, Semantic Relatedness, SmartWeb, Knowledge Representation, RDF, Wrapper Agents, Natural Language Processing, Question Answering, Slot-Filling
The main goal is to develop and implement an ontology-based answer selection algorithm for dialog systems that improves the ranking of semantically represented queries and answers.
The work bridges general linguistics, natural language processing, the Semantic Web initiative, and the practical application of ontologies in dialog system architectures.
The work utilizes various algorithmic approaches to calculate semantic relatedness, specifically evaluating the precision of selecting correct answer candidates from a candidate pool.
The research relies on path-based semantic coherence measures (OntoScore), RDF-based data manipulation (Jena framework), and a newly developed 'semantic density' approach (ProperScore).
The main body focuses on the analysis and evaluation of the OntoScore algorithm and the subsequent development and testing of the ProperScore approach using domain-specific data from the SmartWeb project.
Key terms include Answer Selection, Semantic Web, Ontology, ProperScore, and Semantic Relatedness.
Unlike OntoScore, which relies on semantic distance between concepts, ProperScore utilizes property slot-fillers and instance-checking to ensure that specific factual requirements (like literal values) are matched correctly.
Wrapper agents are essential for extracting semantically formatted information from diverse web sources, providing the data necessary for the answer candidate selection process.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

