Masterarbeit, 2006
36 Seiten, Note: Sehr Gut
This thesis aims to conduct a comparative economic analysis of regulatory competition in corporate law within the European Union and the United States. It investigates whether this competition leads to efficient outcomes and identifies potential inefficiencies. The study assesses potential solutions for improving the regulatory framework.
A. Introduction: This chapter sets the stage for the thesis by establishing the legal context created by European Court of Justice (ECJ) rulings, which allow firms to choose corporate charters across EU member states. It introduces the central research question: Does this regulatory competition lead to efficient corporate law, and if not, what reforms are necessary? The chapter compares the EU situation to the US, where Delaware corporate law has become dominant, and previews the thesis's methodology, which uses the framework of New Institutional Economics to analyze the "market for corporate charters" from both demand and supply perspectives, considering various market participants and their incentives, while accounting for information asymmetries and path dependencies.
B. Literature Overview: This section provides a comprehensive review of existing literature on regulatory competition, encompassing various perspectives such as the "race to the bottom," "race to the top," and scenarios falling between these extremes or representing a lack of competition altogether. The review also considers the role of federal legislators in the US context and examines the European debate surrounding the topic. A summary and analysis of empirical evidence from both the American and European cases are then presented, providing a foundation for the subsequent theoretical analysis.
C. Theoretical Foundations of Regulatory Competition: This chapter lays out the theoretical underpinnings of the analysis. It explores the roles of jurisdictions as either monopolies or competitors within the "market for regulations," examining interjurisdictional competition and the different forms it can take. It also defines the object of corporate law – the firm – discussing the necessity of corporate law and the agency problems it addresses (shareholder-manager, minority-majority shareholder, shareholder-third party).
D. Functioning of Regulatory Competition in Corporate Law: This chapter delves into the practical aspects of regulatory competition in corporate law. It examines the necessary conditions for such competition, including the existence of a sufficient number of regulators and the mobility of firms. The chapter then explores the advantages (legitimacy, power limitation, reduced rent-seeking, satisfaction of heterogeneous preferences, learning and innovation, comparative advantages, faster adjustment to ownership patterns) and problems (interstate and network externalities, path dependencies, lacking incentives for states, information problems including uncertainty in conflict of laws and bounded rationality) inherent in this type of competition. It culminates in a proposed solution: the "modulization" of corporate law and the facilitation of conflict-of-laws resolution.
Regulatory competition, corporate law, European Union, United States, Delaware, efficiency, New Institutional Economics, agency problems, interjurisdictional competition, conflict of laws, harmonization, modulization, race to the top, race to the bottom.
This thesis conducts a comparative economic analysis of regulatory competition in corporate law within the European Union and the United States. It investigates whether this competition leads to efficient outcomes and identifies potential inefficiencies, ultimately assessing potential solutions for improving the regulatory framework.
Key themes include regulatory competition in corporate law in the US and EU; the efficiency of regulatory competition; a comparison of legal and economic situations in the US and EU; the identification of inefficiencies in regulatory competition; and potential normative solutions for improving regulatory frameworks. The thesis specifically examines the "race to the bottom" and "race to the top" theories within the context of regulatory competition.
The thesis is structured into five main sections: An introduction setting the context and research question; a literature review encompassing various perspectives on regulatory competition and empirical evidence from the US and EU; a section detailing the theoretical foundations of regulatory competition, including the concept of the "market for regulations"; an examination of the functioning of regulatory competition in corporate law, including its advantages and disadvantages; and finally, a conclusion.
The thesis utilizes the framework of New Institutional Economics to analyze the "market for corporate charters," considering various market participants, their incentives, information asymmetries, and path dependencies from both demand and supply perspectives.
The analysis delves into the conditions necessary for regulatory competition (sufficient regulators and firm mobility), its advantages (legitimacy, power limitation, reduced rent-seeking, etc.), and its problems (interstate externalities, path dependencies, information problems, etc.). The role of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rulings, allowing firms to choose corporate charters across EU member states, is a central focus.
The thesis proposes "modulization" of corporate law and facilitation of conflict-of-laws resolution as a potential solution to the inefficiencies inherent in regulatory competition.
The thesis compares the EU situation, where firms can choose corporate charters across member states, with the US situation, where Delaware corporate law has become dominant. This comparison is used to analyze the efficiency and potential inefficiencies of regulatory competition in both systems.
The introduction establishes the research question and methodology; the literature review synthesizes existing research and empirical evidence; the theoretical foundations section provides the analytical framework; the chapter on functioning explores the practical aspects of regulatory competition; and the conclusion summarizes the findings and proposed solutions.
Keywords include regulatory competition, corporate law, European Union, United States, Delaware, efficiency, New Institutional Economics, agency problems, interjurisdictional competition, conflict of laws, harmonization, modulization, race to the top, race to the bottom.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!
Kommentare