Masterarbeit, 2005
137 Seiten, Note: A- (German: Sehr Gut 1,3)
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Statement of Problem
1.2 Aims of the research
1.3 Importance of the study
1.4 Research methodology
1.5 Scope and limitations of the study
1.6 Brief overview of the study
1.7 Abbreviations and acronyms
CHAPTER 2 DEFINITION AND DESCRIPTION OF HEDGE FUNDS
2.1 The origin of hedge funds
2.2 The Investment process
2.2.1 Qualification requirements for US hedge funds
2.2.2 Investor restrictions for US hedge funds
2.2.3 Hedge fund structures
2.2.4 Investment strategies and styles
2.2.5 Advantages and benefits of hedge funds
2.3 Summary
CHAPTER 3 REPORTING STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Criticism of hedge funds
3.3 Transparency
3.3.1 Standards and requirements
3.3.2 Investor due diligence
3.3.3 Investment mandate adherence
3.4 Benchmarking and performance measurement
3.4.1 Valuation of Assets
3.4.2 Return Calculation
3.4.3 Dispersion of returns
3.5 Risk Management
3.5.1 Efficient Frontier
3.5.2 Mean-Variance
3.5.3 The Sharpe Ratio
3.5.4 Value at Risk (VaR)
3.5.5 Correlation and the effect of ‘herding’
3.6 Management fees
3.7 Index Surveys
3.7.1 Survivorship Bias
3.7.2 Selection Bias
3.7.3 Instant History Bias
3.8 Fund of Funds
3.9 Summary
CHAPTER 4 REGULATION AND SUPERVISION OF HEDGE FUNDS
4.1 Current regulation
4.1.1 USA
4.1.2 UK
4.1.3 Other countries
4.1.3.1 Hong Kong
4.1.3.2 Ireland
4.1.4 South Africa
4.2 Proposed regulatory changes
4.2.1 USA
4.2.2 UK
4.2.3 Other countries
4.2.3.1 Hong Kong
4.2.3.2 Ireland
4.2.4 South Africa
4.3 Summary
CHAPTER 5 EMPIRICAL RESEARCH
5.1 The plan and procedures of the study
5.2 Empirical Research
5.3 Summary
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 Summary of findings and conclusions
6.2 Recommendations
6.3 Suggestions for further research
This study aims to examine the definition of hedge funds and the regulatory challenges associated with them. The primary research goal is to determine how regulatory bodies can ensure market integrity and investor protection, specifically by evaluating whether stricter regulation through enhanced disclosure or restricted access is the most viable path forward.
2.1 The origin of hedge funds
In attempting to add clarity to the definition of hedge funds Bookstabber (1991) notes that:
“In terms of leverage, hedge funds are the entire universe except those funds that are restricted to leverage no greater than 1. In terms of positions, they are the entire universe except those funds that are restricted to long only. In terms of securities, hedge funds are the entire universe except those funds that are restricted to a somewhat arbitrary and generally evolving set of traditional assets”.
To better understand these attempts at defining hedge funds, it is important to analyse the origin of hedge funds. Alfred W, Jones’ initial application of the term “hedge fund” was appropriate given the strict adherence to the equally long/short strategies employed by his investment structure. However, a plethora of investing strategies that have since evolved now cover such a broad spectrum as to negate the continued practical relevance of the use of the term.
So convinced was Jones of the viability of his hedging strategy that he pioneered two concepts that have remained hallmarks of the industry to this day. Firstly, he introduced a compensation fee of 20% of the fund’s realised profit for his managers. Secondly, most probably to allay the fears of investors, he personally invested significantly into the funds, thereby ensuring that his fortunes were irrevocably tied to those of his investors. It was not until “The Jones Nobody Keeps Up With” article (Loomis, 1966) appeared in Forbes magazine that hedge funds were introduced to the public on a broad scale. The article described how Jones’ funds had attained net of fee returns that were substantially higher than those of the best performing mutual funds. Subsequently several hedge funds sprouted as other investment managers sought to emulate Jones’ success.
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION: This chapter defines the scope of the study, outlines the research problem regarding hedge fund regulation, and establishes the importance of addressing the current knowledge gap in investor protection.
CHAPTER 2 DEFINITION AND DESCRIPTION OF HEDGE FUNDS: This chapter traces the origins of hedge funds, explores the investment process, and discusses various strategies and the fundamental characteristics that distinguish these vehicles from traditional investments.
CHAPTER 3 REPORTING STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS: This section investigates the critical need for transparency, risk management, and the complexities of performance benchmarking in an industry traditionally defined by secrecy.
CHAPTER 4 REGULATION AND SUPERVISION OF HEDGE FUNDS: This chapter provides a comparative review of existing and proposed regulatory structures for hedge funds in the USA, UK, Hong Kong, Ireland, and South Africa.
CHAPTER 5 EMPIRICAL RESEARCH: This chapter details the methodology of a questionnaire survey conducted among industry role players, presenting and analyzing their views on regulation, disclosure, and compliance.
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This final chapter synthesizes the research findings and offers recommendations for improving hedge fund regulation and investor education within the South African context and globally.
Hedge Funds, Regulation, Disclosure Requirements, Transparency, Investor Protection, Market Integrity, Fund of Funds (FOF), Risk Management, Sharpe Ratio, Leverage, Retailization, Benchmarking, Performance Measurement, South Africa, Empirical Research.
The research focuses on the challenges of regulating the hedge fund industry, specifically investigating the necessity for improved disclosure requirements to maintain market security and integrity.
The core themes include the definition of hedge funds, transparency concerns, risk management tools, regulatory environments in various jurisdictions, and the debate surrounding the 'retailization' of hedge funds.
The central question is how regulatory authorities can effectively implement changes in the hedge fund industry—specifically, whether they should further restrict access or introduce rigorous levels of disclosure.
The author uses a combination of academic literature review and empirical research, consisting of a questionnaire survey distributed to hedge fund-affiliated firms and professional experts.
The main body covers the history and definition of hedge funds, reporting standards, benchmarking and risk management methodologies, and a comparative analysis of regulatory structures across several countries.
Key terms include Hedge Funds, Regulation, Disclosure Requirements, Transparency, Investor Protection, Risk Management, and Retailization.
The study argues that transparency is a "double-edged sword" and explores the tension between a hedge fund's need to protect its trading strategies and the regulator's need for information to protect investors.
The study highlights that the South African hedge fund industry is currently unregulated and identifies the need for a consultative approach to regulation, potentially involving a self-regulatory unit financed by industry participants.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

