Doktorarbeit / Dissertation, 2015
77 Seiten
This dissertation investigates the interplay between the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) and the UK government's efforts to counter terrorism. The primary objective is to determine whether foreign terrorists exploit the HRA to obtain and retain shelter in the UK. The research also examines the effectiveness of the HRA's derogation clauses in addressing this issue.
Chapter One introduces the problem statement and provides background information on the relationship between the HRA and the UK's counterterrorism strategy. It outlines the rationale for the research and defines the research question and objectives.
Chapter Two reviews the relevant literature on the ECHR, terrorism, and the protection of innocent citizens. It examines the arguments for and against the HRA's application in the context of terrorism, exploring the moral dilemma of balancing civil liberties and security concerns.
Chapter Three details the research methodology employed in the study, including the research design, primary and secondary sources, research approach, data analysis method, ethics statement, and limitations.
Chapter Four presents the findings and results of the research, addressing the key questions of whether foreign terrorists exploit the HRA to obtain and retain shelter in the UK and the effectiveness of the derogation clauses in addressing this issue.
Chapter Five discusses the implications of the findings, analyzing the potential for foreign terrorists to seek refuge in the UK, examining the impact on society, and exploring potential solutions within the existing legal framework.
This dissertation focuses on the legal and ethical complexities of counterterrorism in the post-HRA era. Key terms include Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA), European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), counterterrorism, terrorism, foreign terrorists, derogation, civil liberties, public security, and the moral dilemma of balancing individual rights with national security concerns.
The research investigates claims that foreign terrorists use the Human Rights Act to obtain and retain shelter in the UK by citing potential human rights violations in their home countries.
There is a moral and legal dilemma in balancing the safeguarding of individual human rights (under the ECHR) with the state's duty to protect innocent citizens from terrorist activities.
Derogations are clauses that allow the state to temporarily suspend certain rights in times of war or public emergency threatening the life of the nation.
Courts have established that deportations are not possible if they defy the Articles of the Convention, particularly if the individual faces torture or inhuman treatment abroad.
Since the attacks, UK governments have prioritized pushing back terrorism, leading to a persistent struggle between national security maneuvers and the HRA 1998 framework.
The paper examines political viewpoints alleging that significant numbers of terrorists circumvent deportations on human rights grounds, making counterterrorism more difficult.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

