Bachelorarbeit, 2018
33 Seiten, Note: 71%
CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 2 – HISTORY OF TESTAMENTARY FREEDOM
CHAPTER 3 – PRESENT POSITION ON TESTAMENTARY FREEDOM
3.1 CAPACITY:
3.2 INTENTION:
3.3 FORMALITIES:
3.4 OTHER FACTORS THAT AFFECT TESTAMENTARY FREEDOM:
CHAPTER 4 – INHERITANCE (PROVISIONS FOR FAMILY AND DEPENDANTS) ACT 1975
CHAPTER 5 – COMPARISON OF JURISDICTIONS: SCOTLAND
5.1 LEGAL RIGHTS:
5.2 IMMORALITY:
5.3 DISPOSAL OF THE CORPSE:
CHAPTER 6 – CONCLUSION
This dissertation examines the extent of testamentary freedom in England and Wales, specifically evaluating whether existing legal restrictions are sufficient or if further limitations should be introduced. By comparing the English legal framework with the Scottish jurisdiction, which imposes stricter mandates regarding family inheritance, the research explores the tension between an individual's right to dispose of their assets and the potential for unfair disinheritance of dependants.
3.1 Capacity:
Capacity refers to the level of competence that an individual has to be able to produce a will. This branches out into two requirements, one with which concerns age and the other concerning the mental capacity that a testator/trix possess in order to make a valid will.
Age is an important factor to determine competence and the Family Law Reform Act 1969 had revisited s. 7 of the Wills Act 1837, which states that “no will made by any person under the age of 18 years shall be valid”19. Although an exception does arise in relation to the age restriction, which concerns individuals that are in the military or are at sea (armed forces), also known as privileged testators/trix and that their age would not act as a restriction and that they are able to construct a will before they are 18 years old20. They are also allowed to create an oral will in these circumstances. One of the leading cases that relates to age restriction is Kenward v Adams21 and this case provides a golden rule, which states that where a testator/trix is old and infirmed, their will must be witnessed and approved by a medical practitioner who can have a record of examinations and medical findings.
Once having satisfied the age requirement, the mental capacity of the testator/trix must also be examined and validated. In the judgment of Hoff v Atherton22, it was stated that “the court is concerned with capacity to understand relevant matters rather than actual understanding”23. The relevant matters would concern the last testament of the testator/trix and their wishes for disposal of their assets and whether or not they were fully aware of these wishes. The case of Banks v Goodfellow24 sets out criteria that should be followed in order to satisfy the mental competence test.
CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION: This chapter introduces the definition of a will and the concept of testamentary freedom, establishing the objective to analyze existing legal restrictions.
CHAPTER 2 – HISTORY OF TESTAMENTARY FREEDOM: This section provides a historical overview of succession law in England and Wales, tracing its development from the Norman Conquest and the evolution of the Tripartite Rule.
CHAPTER 3 – PRESENT POSITION ON TESTAMENTARY FREEDOM: This chapter analyzes the specific legal criteria required to validate a will, including capacity, intention, formalities, and the impact of public policy and undue influence.
CHAPTER 4 – INHERITANCE (PROVISIONS FOR FAMILY AND DEPENDANTS) ACT 1975: This chapter focuses on the most significant restriction on testamentary freedom, discussing the mechanisms through which family members can challenge a will.
CHAPTER 5 – COMPARISON OF JURISDICTIONS: SCOTLAND: This section compares the English model with Scotland, highlighting differences in fixed family rights, immorality, and corpse disposal rules.
CHAPTER 6 – CONCLUSION: The final chapter summarizes the findings, arguing that while current restrictions are reasonable, further clarification on formal requirements and inheritance claims is necessary.
Testamentary freedom, Succession law, Wills Act 1837, Inheritance Act 1975, Testamentary capacity, Animus testandi, Scottish succession, Fixed family rights, Public policy, Undue influence, Forfeiture rule, Probate, Beneficiaries, Legal competence, Estate planning.
The dissertation explores the scope of testamentary freedom in England and Wales and whether the current legal limitations strike a fair balance between an individual's right to dispose of property and their moral obligations to family.
Key themes include the historical evolution of inheritance law, the validity requirements for wills (capacity, intention, formalities), the role of the 1975 Act in challenging wills, and a comparative look at the Scottish legal system.
The research asks to what extent testamentary freedom currently exists and whether there is a need for the government to introduce stricter legal limitations to protect family dependants.
The work utilizes "Blackletter Law" as its primary method, analyzing statutes, relevant judicial precedents, and legal reforms to determine the current state and effectiveness of the law.
The main body systematically breaks down the requirements for creating a valid will, investigates challenges such as fraud and undue influence, examines the specific impact of the Inheritance (Provisions for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, and contrasts these with the Scottish jurisdiction.
The keywords center on the fundamental concepts of estate law, such as "testamentary freedom," "succession," and "capacity," alongside specific legislation like the "Wills Act 1837" and "Inheritance Act 1975."
Unlike England and Wales, where freedom is largely unrestricted, Scotland maintains "legal rights" that mandate the distribution of moveable assets to surviving spouses and children, regardless of the testator's wishes.
This case is a landmark example illustrating the conflict between a testator's right to disinherit an adult child and the court's power under the 1975 Act to provide reasonable maintenance to a financially dependent family member.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

