Bachelorarbeit, 2017
36 Seiten, Note: 80.00
This research paper aims to analyze the ethical issues surrounding sweatshops by exploring the contrasting viewpoints of worker exploitation and worker consent. The study aims to evaluate the moral significance of worker consent, examine the arguments for and against sweatshops, and investigate the influence of moral intensity dimensions, particularly magnitude of consequences and proximity, on individuals' ethical decisions and purchasing patterns related to sweatshops.
Chapter 1: Introduction introduces the ethical dilemma of sweatshops, highlighting the contrasting perspectives on their impact. It emphasizes the importance of studying moral intensity and its influence on ethical decision-making.
Chapter 2: Aims and Objectives outlines the research goals, focusing on evaluating the key ethical issues associated with sweatshops, examining workers' consents against exploitation, and assessing the role of moral intensity dimensions in ethical decision-making.
Chapter 3: Literature Review explores the transformative power of choice, particularly in the context of sweatshop labor. It presents arguments for both the exploitative nature of sweatshops and the opportunity they provide for workers, considering ethical frameworks like Kantian ethics and Utilitarianism.
Chapter 4: Findings and Analysis examines the data collected from a focus group, exploring the correlation between magnitude of consequences and purchasing patterns, and the inverse correlation between proximity and purchasing behaviors.
Chapter 5: Conclusion summarizes the findings, suggesting that while sweatshops might not be entirely ethical, their abolition could lead to worse outcomes for workers. It highlights the need for government oversight and responsible media portrayals to address the ethical concerns surrounding sweatshops.
Sweatshops, ethics, worker consent, worker exploitation, moral intensity, magnitude of consequences, proximity, purchasing patterns, multinational enterprises (MNEs), Kantian ethics, Utilitarianism, autonomy, freedom of choice, poverty, development, media framing, ethical decision-making.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!
Kommentare