Masterarbeit, 2012
84 Seiten
This Masters Thesis explores the viability of abolishing trial by jury in the UK legal system. The thesis examines the arguments for and against the jury system, exploring the historical context, the potential benefits and drawbacks of replacing juries with judges, and the implications for the criminal justice system as a whole.
The first chapter delves into the historical context of the right to trial by jury, examining the repeal of section 43 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and the defendants right to a trial by jury. Chapter 2 then focuses on the ability of juries to comprehend, understand, and process complex information, analyzing the specific case of fraud trials and the views of Sir Robin Auld. Chapter 3 explores the potential for prejudice and bias within juries, examining the impact of conscious and unconscious discrimination, and the influence of the defendants previous criminal record. Chapter 4 examines the role of the activist jury, exploring the acceptance of the law, the history of jury activism, and the relationship between juries and democracy. Chapter 5 investigates the decline of the jury system, focusing on its decline in criminal cases, the role of the civil jury, and the issues of excessive damages and defamation bills.
The core concepts explored in this thesis include trial by jury, criminal justice system, fair trial, jury bias, jury comprehension, judicial process, legal reform, and democratic principles.
The thesis debates whether the UK should abolish jury trials in the Crown Court and replace them with trials heard by a judge alone.
The author discusses whether juries can fully comprehend complex legal details, particularly in complicated fraud cases.
It examines both conscious and unconscious discrimination, as well as how a defendant's previous criminal record might unfairly influence a jury's view.
An activist jury is one that might prioritize democratic or moral beliefs over the strict application of the law, a concept explored in Chapter 4.
The text explores the decline due to issues like excessive damages and legislative changes like the defamation bill.
The thesis proposes replacing the jury with an appointed panel of judges to ensure a more consistent and comprehending judicial process.
Der GRIN Verlag hat sich seit 1998 auf die Veröffentlichung akademischer eBooks und Bücher spezialisiert. Der GRIN Verlag steht damit als erstes Unternehmen für User Generated Quality Content. Die Verlagsseiten GRIN.com, Hausarbeiten.de und Diplomarbeiten24 bieten für Hochschullehrer, Absolventen und Studenten die ideale Plattform, wissenschaftliche Texte wie Hausarbeiten, Referate, Bachelorarbeiten, Masterarbeiten, Diplomarbeiten, Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Aufsätze einem breiten Publikum zu präsentieren.
Kostenfreie Veröffentlichung: Hausarbeit, Bachelorarbeit, Diplomarbeit, Dissertation, Masterarbeit, Interpretation oder Referat jetzt veröffentlichen!

